Neuronal gain adaptation has been proposed as the underlying mechanism leading to the perception of phantom sounds such as Zwicker tones and tinnitus. In this gain-adaptation theory, cochlear compression plays a significant role with weaker compression leading to stronger phantom percepts. The specific aim of this study was to find a link between the strength of neuronal gain adaptation and cochlear compression. Compression was assessed using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Gain adaptation is hypothesized to manifest itself in the sensitization observed for the detection of masked tones when preceded by notched noise. Perceptual thresholds for pure tones in notched noise were measured at multiple frequencies following various priming signals. The observed sensitization was larger than expected from the combined effect of the various maskers. However, there was no link between sensitization and compression. Instead, across subjects, stronger sensitization correlated with stronger DPOAEs evoked by low-level primaries. In addition, growth of DPOAEs correlated reliably with perceptual thresholds across frequencies within subjects. Together, the data suggest that short-term dynamic adaptation leading to perceptual sensitization is the result of an active process mediated by the outer hair cells, which are thought to modulate the gain of the cochlear amplifier via efferent feedback.

1.
Bregman
,
A.
(
1990
).
Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound
(
MIT
,
Cambridge, MA
).
2.
Carlyon
,
R.
(
1989
). “
Changes in the masked thresholds of brief tones produced by prior bursts of noise
,”
Hear. Res.
41
,
223
235
.
3.
Cooper
,
N.
,
Pickles
,
J.
, and
Manley
,
G.
(
2008
). “
Traveling waves, second filters, and physiological vulnerability: A short history of the discovery of active processes in hearing
,”
Springer Handbook of Auditory Research
(
Springer
,
New York
).
4.
Dean
,
I.
,
Harper
,
N. S.
, and
McAlpine
,
D.
(
2005
). “
Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics
,”
Nat. Neurosci.
8
,
1684
1689
.
5.
Dean
,
I.
,
Robinson
,
B.
,
Harper
,
N. S.
, and
McAlpine
,
D.
(
2008
). “
Rapid neural adaptation to sound level statistics
,”
J. Neurosci.
28
,
6430
6438
.
6.
Janssen
,
T.
,
Kummer
,
P.
, and
Arnold
,
W.
(
1998
). “
Growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3418
3430
.
7.
Kummer
,
P.
,
Janssen
,
T.
, and
Arnold
,
W.
(
1998
). “
The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1 f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3431
3444
.
8.
Long
,
G. R.
,
Talmadge
,
C. L.
, and
Lee
,
J.
(
2008
). “
Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
1613
1626
.
9.
Mauermann
,
M.
, and
Kollmeier
,
B.
(
2004
). “
Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions and the influence of the second DPOAE source
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
2199
2212
.
10.
Meddis
,
R.
, and
O’Mard
,
L.
(
2005
). “
A computer model of the auditory-nerve response to forward-masking stimuli
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
3787
.
11.
Neely
,
S.
, and
Kim
,
D.
(
2008
). “
Cochlear models incorporating active processes
,”
Springer Handbook of Auditory Research
(
Springer
,
New York
).
12.
Parra
,
L.
, and
Pearlmutter
,
B.
(
2007
). “
Illusory percepts from auditory adaptation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
(
3
),
1632
1641
.
13.
Rosengard
,
P.
,
Oxenham
,
A.
, and
Braida
,
L.
(
2005
). “
Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
(
5
),
3028
3041
.
14.
Shera
,
C. A.
(
2004
). “
Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions
,”
Ear Hear.
25
,
86
97
.
15.
Strickland
,
E. A.
(
2004
). “
The temporal effect with notched-noise maskers: Analysis in terms of input-output functions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
2234
2245
.
16.
Taylor
,
M. M.
, and
Creelman
,
C. D.
(
1967
). “
Pest: Efficient estimates on probability functions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
41
,
782
787
.
17.
Thibodeau
,
L. M.
(
1991
). “
Performance of hearing-impaired persons on auditory enhancement tasks
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
,
2843
2850
.
19.
Viemeister
,
N.
, and
Bacon
,
S. P.
(
1982
). “
Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
71
(
6
),
1502
1507
.
20.
Wen
,
B.
,
Wang
,
G. I.
,
Dean
,
I.
, and
Delgutte
,
B.
(
2009
). “
Dynamic range adaptation to sound level statistics in the auditory nerve
,”
J. Neurosci.
29
,
13797
13808
.
21.
Williams
,
E. J.
, and
Bacon
,
S. P.
(
2005
). “
Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures
,”
Hear. Res.
201
,
44
54
.
22.
Zwicker
,
E.
(
1965
). “
Temporal effects in simultaneous masking by white-noise bursts
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
37
,
653
663
.
You do not currently have access to this content.