Previous auditory perturbation studies have demonstrated that talkers spontaneously compensate for real-time formant-shifts by altering formant production in a manner opposite to the perturbation. Here, two experiments were conducted to examine the effect of amplitude of perturbation on the compensatory behavior for the vowel /ε/. In the first experiment, 20 male talkers received three step-changes in acoustic feedback: F1 was increased by 50, 100, and 200 Hz, while F2 was simultaneously decreased by 75, 125, and 250 Hz. In the second experiment, 21 male talkers received acoustic feedback in which the shifts in F1 and F2 were incremented by and −5 Hz on each utterance to a maximum of and −450 Hz, respectively. In both experiments, talkers altered production of F1 and F2 in a manner opposite to that of the formant-shift perturbation. Compensation was approximately 25%–30% of the perturbation magnitude for shifts in F1 and F2 up to 200 and 250 Hz, respectively. As larger shifts were applied, compensation reached a plateau and then decreased. The similarity of results across experiments suggests that the compensatory response is dependent on the perturbation magnitude but not on the rate at which the perturbation is introduced.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2010
February 05 2010
Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes
Ewen N. MacDonald;
Ewen N. MacDonald
a)
Department of Psychology and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Queen’s University
, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Robyn Goldberg;
Robyn Goldberg
Department of Psychology,
Queen’s University
, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Kevin G. Munhall
Kevin G. Munhall
Department of Psychology and Department of Otolaryngology,
Queen’s University
, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 1059–1068 (2010)
Article history
Received:
August 17 2009
Accepted:
December 06 2009
Citation
Ewen N. MacDonald, Robyn Goldberg, Kevin G. Munhall; Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 February 2010; 127 (2): 1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3278606
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2011)
The effects of tongue loading and auditory feedback on vowel production
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2011)
Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2009)
A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2011)
Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2017)