Previous auditory perturbation studies have demonstrated that talkers spontaneously compensate for real-time formant-shifts by altering formant production in a manner opposite to the perturbation. Here, two experiments were conducted to examine the effect of amplitude of perturbation on the compensatory behavior for the vowel /ε/. In the first experiment, 20 male talkers received three step-changes in acoustic feedback: F1 was increased by 50, 100, and 200 Hz, while F2 was simultaneously decreased by 75, 125, and 250 Hz. In the second experiment, 21 male talkers received acoustic feedback in which the shifts in F1 and F2 were incremented by +4 and −5 Hz on each utterance to a maximum of +350 and −450 Hz, respectively. In both experiments, talkers altered production of F1 and F2 in a manner opposite to that of the formant-shift perturbation. Compensation was approximately 25%–30% of the perturbation magnitude for shifts in F1 and F2 up to 200 and 250 Hz, respectively. As larger shifts were applied, compensation reached a plateau and then decreased. The similarity of results across experiments suggests that the compensatory response is dependent on the perturbation magnitude but not on the rate at which the perturbation is introduced.

1.
Bauer
,
J. J.
,
Mittal
,
J.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
, and
Hain
,
T. C.
(
2006
). “
Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: An automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
2363
2371
.
2.
Beurze
,
S. M.
,
Van Pelt
,
S.
, and
Medendorp
,
W. P.
(
2006
). “
Behavioral reference frames for planning human reaching movements
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
96
,
352
362
.
3.
Burnett
,
T. A.
,
Freedland
,
M. B.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
, and
Hain
,
T. C.
(
1998
). “
Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3153
3161
.
4.
Burr
,
D.
, and
Alais
,
D.
(
2006
). “
Combining visual and auditory information
,”
Prog. Brain Res.
155
,
243
258
.
5.
Churchland
,
A. K.
, and
Lisberger
,
S. G.
(
2009
). “
Gain control in human smooth-pursuit eye movements
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
87
,
2936
2945
.
6.
Costantini
,
M.
, and
Haggard
,
P.
(
2007
). “
The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership
,”
Conscious. Cogn
16
,
229
240
.
7.
Cowie
,
R.
, and
Douglas-Cowie
,
E.
(
1992
).
Postlingually Acquired Deafness: Speech Deterioration and the Wider Consequences
(
Mouton de Gruyter
,
New York
).
8.
Hopp
,
J. J.
, and
Fuchs
,
A. F.
(
2004
). “
The characteristics and neuronal substrate of saccadic eye movement plasticity
,”
Prog. Neurobiol.
72
,
27
53
.
9.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
(
1998
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production
,”
Science
279
,
1213
1216
.
10.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
(
2002
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation of speech: I. Compensation and adaptation
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
45
,
295
310
.
11.
Jones
,
J. A.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2005
). “
Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production
,”
Curr. Biol.
15
,
1768
1772
.
12.
Kalveram
,
K. T.
, and
Jäncke
,
L.
(
1989
). “
Vowel duration and voice onset time for stressed and nonstressed syllables in stutterers under delayed auditory feedback condition
,”
Folia Phoniatr (Basel)
41
,
30
42
.
13.
Kawato
,
M.
(
1989
). “
Motor theory of speech perception revisited from the minimum torque change neural network model
,” in
Eighth Symposium on Future Electron Devices
, Tokyo, Japan, pp.
141
150
.
14.
Krakauer
,
J. W.
,
Pine
,
Z. M.
,
Ghilardi
,
M. F.
, and
Ghez
,
C.
(
2000
), “
Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories
,”
J. Neurosci.
20
,
8916
8924
.
15.
Larson
,
C. R.
,
Altman
,
K. W.
,
Liu
,
H.
, and
Hain
,
T. C.
(
2008
). “
Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F0 control
,”
Exp. Brain Res.
187
,
613
621
.
16.
Liu
,
H.
, and
Larson
,
C. R.
(
2007
). “
Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch shift reflex
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
3671
3677
.
17.
Munhall
,
K. G.
,
MacDonald
,
E. N.
,
Byrne
,
S. K.
, and
Johnsrude
,
I.
(
2009
). “
Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed to resist compensation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
384
390
.
18.
Nasir
,
S. M.
, and
Ostry
,
D. J.
(
2008
). “
Speech motor learning in profoundly deaf adults
,”
Nat. Neurosci.
11
,
1217
1222
.
19.
Oller
,
D. K.
, and
Eilers
,
R. E.
(
1988
). “
The role of audition in infant babbling
,”
Child Dev.
59
,
441
449
.
20.
Orfandidis
,
S. J.
(
1988
).
Optimum Signal Processing, An Introduction
(
MacMillan
,
New York
).
21.
Pavani
,
F.
, and
Zampini
,
M.
(
2007
). “
The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm
,”
Perception
36
,
1547
1554
.
22.
Pruszynski
,
J. A.
,
Kurtzer
,
I. L.
,
Lillicrap
,
T. P.
, and
Scott
,
S. H.
(
2009
). “
Temporal evolution of “automatic gain-scaling”
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
102
,
992
1003
.
23.
Purcell
,
D. W.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2006a
). “
Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
2288
2297
.
24.
Purcell
,
D. W.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2006b
). “
Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
966
977
.
25.
Rosner
,
B. S.
, and
Pickering
,
J. B.
(
1994
).
Vowel Perception and Production
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford
).
26.
Saunders
,
J. A.
, and
Knill
,
D. C.
(
2004
). “
Visual feedback control of hand movements
,”
J. Neurosci.
24
,
3223
3234
.
27.
Smith
,
M. A.
,
Ghazizadeh
,
A.
, and
Shadmehr
,
R.
(
2006
), “
Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning
,”
PLoS Biology
4
,
e179
.
28.
Tin
,
C.
, and
Poon
,
C. -S.
(
2005
). “
Internal models in sensorimotor integration: Perspectives from adaptive control theory
,”
J. Neural Eng.
2
,
S147
S163
.
29.
Tremblay
,
S.
,
Schiller
,
D. M.
, and
Ostry
,
D. J.
(
2003
). “
Somatosensory basis of speech production
,”
Nature (London)
423
,
866
869
.
30.
Villacorta
,
V. M.
,
Perkell
,
J. S.
, and
Guenther
,
F. H.
(
2007
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
2306
2319
.
31.
Wolpert
,
D. M.
, and
Kawato
,
M.
(
1998
). “
Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control
,”
Neural Networks
11
,
1317
1329
.
32.
Zheng
,
Z. Z.
,
Munhall
,
K. G.
, and
Johnsrude
,
I.
(
2009
). “
Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and in monitoring one’s own voice during speech production
,”
J. Cogn Neurosci.
In press.
You do not currently have access to this content.