Producing a tone by increasing the blowing pressure to excite a higher frequency impedance minimum, or overblowing, is widely used in standard flute technique. In this paper, the effect of overblowing a fingering is explored with spectral analysis, and a fingering detector is designed based on acoustical knowledge and pattern classification techniques. The detector performs signal analysis of the strong broadband signal, that is, spectrally shaped by the pipe impedance, and measures the spectral energy during the attack around multiples of the fundamental frequency sub-multiples over the first octave and a half. It is trained and evaluated on sounds recorded with four expert performers. They played six series of tones from overblown and regular fingerings, with frequencies that are octave- and non-octave-related to the playing frequency. The best of the four proposed sound descriptors allows for a detection error below 1.3% for notes with two and three fingerings (C5, D5, C6, and C6) and below 14% for four (E6) or five fingerings (G6). The error is shown to dramatically increase when two fingerings’ impedance become too similar (E6 and A4 and G6 and C5).

1.
J. W.
Coltman
, “
Sounding mechanism of the flute and organ pipe
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
44
,
983
(
1968
).
2.
N. H.
Fletcher
and
T. D.
Rossing
,
The Physics of Musical Instruments
, 2nd ed. (
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
,
1998
), pp.
503
551
.
3.
R.
Rowe
,
Interactive Music Systems: Machine Listening and Composing
, 1st ed. (
The MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
,
1992
).
4.
N.
Orio
,
S.
Lemouton
, and
D.
Schwartz
, “
Score following: State of the art and new developments
,” in
International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expressions
, (
2003
), pp.
36
41
.
5.
M.
Puckette
and
C.
Lippe
, “
Getting the acoustic parameters from a live performance
,” in
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition
(
1994
), pp.
328
333
.
6.
R. W.
Young
, “
Terminology for logarithmic frequency units
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
11
,
134
139
(
1939
).
7.
R.
Dick
,
The Other Flute—Performance Manual of Contemporary Techniques
, 2nd ed. (
Multiple Breath Music Company
,
New York
,
1989
).
8.
P.-Y.
Artaud
,
Harmonics Exercise Book: Simple Notes and Multisounds for Flute
(
Gérard Billaudot
,
Paris
,
1992
).
9.
M. M.
Wanderley
and
P.
Depalle
, “
Gestural control of sound synthesis
,”
Proc. IEEE
92
,
632
644
(
2004
).
10.
D.
Pousset
, “
La flûte-MIDI, l’historique et quelques applications (The MIDI-flute: History and applications)
,” MS thesis,
Université de Paris-Sorbonne
, Paris (
1992
).
11.
S.
Ystad
and
T.
Voinier
, “
A virtually real flute
,”
Comput. Music J.
25
,
13
24
(
2001
).
12.
C.
Traube
,
P.
Depalle
, and
M. M.
Wanderley
, “
Indirect acquisition of instrumental gesture based on signal, physical and perceptual information
,” in
International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expressions
(
2003
), pp.
42
47
.
13.
N.
Orio
, “
The timbre space of the classical guitar and its relationship with the plucking techniques
,” in
Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC’99)
(
1999
), pp.
391
394
.
14.
A.
Krishnaswamy
and
J. O.
Smith
, “
Inferring control inputs to an acoustic violin from audio spectra
,” in
International IEEE Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME ’03)
(
2003
), Vol.
I
, pp.
733
736
.
15.
G.
Assayag
,
M.
Castellengo
, and
C.
Malherbe
, “
Nouvelles techniques instrumentales—Composition et formalisation (New instrumental techniques—Composition and formalization)
,” Ircam Technical Report No. 38, Ircam, Paris, France,
1985
.
16.
E. B.
Egozy
, “
Deriving musical control features from a real-time timbre analysis of the clarinet
,” MS thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
, Cambridge, MA (
1995
).
17.
C.
Kereliuk
,
B.
Scherrer
,
V.
Verfaille
,
P.
Depalle
, and
M. M.
Wanderley
, “
Indirect acquisition of fingerings of harmonic notes on the flute
,” in
Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC’07)
(
2007
), Vol.
I
, pp.
263
266
.
18.
I. T.
Jolliffe
,
Principal Component Analysis
,
Springer Series in Statistice
XXIX
, 2nd ed. (
Springer
,
New York
,
2002
).
19.
P.-Y.
Artaud
,
Flûtes au présent/Present Day Flute
, 2nd ed. (
Gérard Billaudot
,
Paris
,
1995
).
20.
J. W.
Coltman
, “
Jet offset, harmonic content, and warble in the flute
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
2312
2319
(
2006
).
21.
J.
Wolfe
,
J.
Smith
,
J.
Tann
, and
N. H.
Fletcher
, “
Acoustic impedance spectra of classical and modern flutes
,”
J. Sound Vib.
243
,
127
144
(
2001
).
22.
J.
Wolfe
,
J.
Smith
,
J.
Tann
, and
N. H.
Fletcher
, “
Acoustics of classical and modern flutes: A compendium of impedance spectra, sound spectra, sounds and fingerings
,”
J. Sound Vib.
Electronic supplement, available at http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/music/flute/virtual (Last viewed May 12,
2009
).
23.
J.
Smith
,
J.
Wolfe
, and
M.
Green
, “
Head joint, embouchure hole and filtering effects on the input impedance of flutes
,” in
Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference (SMAC 03)
(
2003
), pp.
295
298
.
24.
A. M.
Noll
, “
Short-time spectrum and “cepstrum” techniques for vocal pitch detection
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
,
296
302
(
1964
).
25.
G. J.
McLachlan
,
Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition
,
Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
Vol.
544
(
Wiley-Interscience
,
New York
,
2004
).
26.
R.
Kohavi
, “
A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection
,” in
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(
1995
), pp.
1137
1145
.
You do not currently have access to this content.