McKay and McDermott [J. Acoust. Soc. Am.100, 10811092 (1996)] found that when two different amplitude-modulated pulse trains are presented to two channels separated by <1.5mm, some cochlear implant (CI) listeners perceive the aggregate temporal pattern. The present study attempted to extend this general finding and to test whether dual-electrode stimulation would increase the upper limit of temporal pitch perception in CIs. Six subjects were asked to rank 12 dual-channel stimuli differing in their rate [ranging from 92 to 516 pps (pulses per second) on each individual channel] and in their inter-channel delay (pulses on the two channels being either nearly simultaneous or delayed by half the period). The data showed that, for an electrode separation of 0.75 or 1.1 mm, (a) the perceived pitch was on average slightly higher for the long-delay than for the short-delay stimuli but never matched the pitch corresponding to the aggregate temporal pattern, (b) the upper limit of temporal pitch did not increase using long-delay stimuli, and (c) the pitch differences between short- and long-delay stimuli were largely insensitive to channel order and to electrode configuration. These results suggest that there may be more independence between CI channels than previously thought.

1.
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
1992
). “
Detecting F0 differences and pitch-pulse asynchronies
,” in
The Auditory Processing of Speech. From Sounds to Words
, edited by
B.
Schouten
(
Mouton-De Gruyter
,
Berlin
), pp.
149
156
.
2.
Carlyon
,
R. P.
, and
Deeks
,
J. M.
(
2002
). “
Limitations on rate discrimination
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
1009
1025
.
3.
Carlyon
,
R. P.
,
Geurts
,
L.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2000
). “
Detection of small across-channel timing differences by cochlear implantees
,”
Hear. Res.
141
,
140
154
.
4.
Carlyon
,
R. P.
, and
Shamma
,
S.
(
2003
). “
An account of monaural phase sensitivity
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
114
,
333
348
.
5.
Cohen
,
L. T.
,
Saunders
,
E.
,
Knight
,
M. R.
, and
Cowan
,
R. S.
(
2006
). “
Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with contour and straight nucleus electrode arrays
,”
Hear. Res.
212
,
160
175
.
6.
de Balthasar
,
C.
,
Boëx
,
C.
,
Cosendai
,
G.
,
Valentini
,
G.
,
Sigrist
,
A.
, and
Pelizzone
,
M.
(
2003
). “
Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects
,”
Hear. Res.
182
,
77
87
.
7.
Dingemanse
,
J. G.
,
Frijns
,
J. H.
, and
Briaire
,
J. J.
(
2006
). “
Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers
,”
Ear Hear.
27
,
645
657
.
8.
Donaldson
,
G. S.
,
Kreft
,
H. A.
, and
Litvak
,
L.
(
2005
). “
Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
623
626
.
9.
Friesen
,
L. M.
,
Shannon
,
R. V.
,
Baskent
,
D.
, and
Wang
,
X.
(
2001
). “
Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
1150
1163
.
10.
Friesen
,
L. M.
,
Shannon
,
R. V.
, and
Cruz
,
R. J.
(
2005
). “
Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants
,”
Audiol. Neuro-Otol.
10
,
169
184
.
11.
Kong
,
Y. Y.
,
Deeks
,
J. M.
,
Axon
,
P. R.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2009
). “
Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
1649
1657
.
12.
Laneau
,
J.
,
Boets
,
B.
,
Moonen
,
M.
,
van Wieringen
,
A.
, and
Wouters
,
J.
(
2005
). “
A flexible auditory research platform using acoustic or electric stimuli for adults and young children
,”
J. Neurosci. Methods
142
,
131
136
.
13.
Levitt
,
H.
(
1971
). “
Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
,
467
477
.
14.
Long
,
C. J.
,
Nimmo-Smith
,
I.
,
Baguley
,
D. M.
,
O’Driscoll
,
M.
,
Ramsden
,
R.
,
Otto
,
S. R.
,
Axon
,
P. R.
, and
Carlyon
,
R. P.
(
2005
). “
Optimizing the clinical fit of auditory brain stem implants
,”
Ear Hear.
26
,
251
262
.
15.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
Henshall
,
K. R.
,
Farrell
,
R. J.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
2003
). “
A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
2054
2063
.
16.
McKay
,
C. M.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
1996
). “
The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
1081
1092
.
17.
McKay
,
C. M.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
1999
). “
The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
998
1009
.
18.
Middlebrooks
,
J. C.
(
2004
). “
Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
452
468
.
19.
Middlebrooks
,
J. C.
, and
Snyder
,
R. L.
(
2009
). “
Enhanced transmission of temporal fine structure using penetrating auditory nerve electrodes
,” in
Proceedings of the 32nd Midwinter Research Meeting
, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Baltimore, MD.
20.
Oxenham
,
A. J.
,
Bernstein
,
J. G.
, and
Penagos
,
H.
(
2004
). “
Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
101
,
1421
1425
.
21.
Poulton
,
E. C.
(
1979
). “
Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude
,”
Psychol. Bull.
86
,
777
803
.
22.
Rose
,
J. E.
,
Brugge
,
J. F.
,
Anderson
,
D. J.
, and
Hind
,
J. E.
(
1967
). “
Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
30
,
769
93
.
23.
Snyder
,
R. L.
,
Middlebrooks
,
J. C.
, and
Bonham
,
B. H.
(
2008
). “
Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity
,”
Hear. Res.
235
,
23
38
.
24.
Tong
,
Y. C.
, and
Clark
,
G. M.
(
1986
). “
Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
,
1958
1966
.
25.
Townshend
,
B.
,
Cotter
,
N.
,
Van Compernolle
,
D.
, and
White
,
R. L.
(
1987
). “
Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
106
115
.
You do not currently have access to this content.