This paper evaluates the potential of the field separation method (FSM) for performing subwoofer measurements in a small test room with poor absorbing properties, as is commonly available. The FSM requires the knowledge of both acoustic pressure and velocity fields on a closed surface surrounding the tested source. Pressures and velocities, measured using a p-p probe on a half-sphere mesh, are collected under various conditions: in a room with variable reverberation time (6.4–0.6 s) and with four measurement half-sphere radii. The measured data are expanded on spherical harmonics, separating outward and inward propagation. The pressure field reflected by walls of the surrounding room is then subtracted from the measured field to estimate the pressure field that would have been radiated under free-field conditions. Theoretical frequency response of the subwoofer is computed using an analytical formulation derived from an extended Thiele and Small model of the membrane motion, coupled to a boundary element model for computing the radiated pressure while taking into account the actual subwoofer geometry. Measurement and simulation results show a good agreement. The effects of the measurement distance, the measurement point number, and the room reverberation time on the separation process are then discussed.

1.
International Electrotechnical Commission
,
Sound system equipment—Part 5: Loudspeakers
, IEC 268-5, 2nd ed. (
1989
).
2.
R. C.
Heyser
, “
Acoustical measurements by time delay spectrometry
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
15
,
370
382
(
1967
).
3.
J. M.
Berman
and
L. M.
Fincham
, “
The application of digital techniques to measurements of loudspeakers
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
25
,
370
384
(
1977
).
4.
S. I.
Soterios
, “
A method for extending the measured response of a loudspeaker towards the low frequencies, with the use of cepstral analysis
,” in
AES 92nd Convention
(
1992
), Preprint No. 3233.
5.
D. B.
Keele
, “
Low-frequency loudspeaker assessment by nearfield sound-pressure measurement
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
22
,
154
162
(
1974
).
6.
R. T.
Kessel
, “
Predicting farfield pressures from nearfield loudspeaker measurements
,” in
85th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society
(
1988
), Preprint No. 2729.
7.
R. H.
Small
, “
Simplified loudspeaker measurements at low frequencies
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
20
,
28
33
(
1972
).
8.
J.
Christophorou
, “
Low-frequency loudspeaker measurements with an accelerometer
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
28
,
809
816
(
1980
).
9.
C. J.
Struck
and
S. F.
Temme
, “
Simulated free field measurements
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
42
,
467
482
(
1994
).
10.
J.
Vanderkooy
and
S. P.
Lipshitz
, “
Can one perform quasi-anechoic measurements in normal rooms?
,”
125th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society
(
2008
), Preprint No. 7525.
11.
H.
Lu
,
S.
Wu
, and
D. B.
Keele
, “
High-accuracy full-sphere electro acoustic polar measurements at high frequencies using the HELS method
,”
121st Convention of the Audio Engineering Society
(
2006
), Preprint No. 6981.
12.
Z. X.
Wang
and
S. F.
Wu
, “
Helmholtz equation least-squares method for reconstructing the acoustic pressure field
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
,
2020
2032
(
1997
).
13.
G.
Weinreich
and
E. B.
Arnold
, “
Method for measuring acoustic radiation fields
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
68
,
404
411
(
1980
).
14.
I. E.
Tsukernikov
, “
Calculation of the field of a sound source in a bounded space
,”
Sov. Phys. Acoust.
35
,
304
306
(
1989
).
15.
C.
Langrenne
, “
Méthodes de résolution du problème inverse pour l’identintification de sources en milieu confiné (Regularization methods of the acoustic inverse problem for the characterization of sources in bounded space)
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Maine University
, Le Mans, France (
1997
), in French.
16.
E. G.
Williams
,
Fourier Acoustics
(
Academic
,
London
,
1999
).
17.
M.
Melon
,
C.
Langrenne
,
D.
Rousseau
, and
P.
Herzog
, “
Comparison of four subwoofer measurement techniques
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
55
,
1077
1091
(
2007
).
18.
C.
Langrenne
,
M.
Melon
, and
A.
Garcia
, “
Boundary element method for the acoustic characterization of a machine in bounded noisy environment
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
2750
2757
(
2007
).
19.
T.
Hansen
, “
Spherical expansions of time domain acoustic fields: Application to near field scanning
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
1204
1215
(
1995
).
20.
B.
Rafaely
, “
Analysis and design of spherical microphone arrays
,”
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.
13
,
135
143
(
2005
).
21.
F.
Jacobsen
and
H. -E.
de Bree
, “
A comparison of two different sound intensity measurement principles
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
1510
1517
(
2005
).
22.
W.
Leach
, “
Loudspeaker voice-coil inductance losses: Circuit models, parameter estimation and effect on frequency response
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
50
,
442
450
(
2002
).
23.
J. G.
Knudsen
and
M. H.
Jensen
, “
Low-frequency loudspeaker models that include suspension creep
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
41
,
3
18
(
1993
).
24.
J. C.
Le Roux
, “
Le haut-parleur électrodynamique: Estimation des paramètres électroacoustiques aux basses fréquences et modélisation de la suspension (The electrodynamic loudspeaker: Determination of the low-frequency electroacoustic parameters and modelization of the suspension)
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Maine University
, Le Mans, France (
1994
), in French.
You do not currently have access to this content.