The directional microphone systems of modern digital hearing aids are capable of changing their spatial directivity pattern and/or the microphone mode in response to changes in the properties of environmental sounds. These adaptive/automatic features make measurement of a hearing aid’s directivity in a given test environment very difficult. Assessing the directivity of such systems requires a signal that can record the system’s response while not changing the system’s directivity. This paper proposes a method using a signal cancellation technique involving impulse responses to acoustically assess a hearing aid’s directivity (referred to as the IR method). The impulse is presumed to be undetectable to the adaptive/automatic system because it contains little energy and a short response could be recorded before the system actually reacts. In the current study, the IR method was evaluated by testing five adaptive/automatic directional hearing aids in noise of various intensities. The results revealed that the IR method was an accurate and repeatable way to assess slow-acting directional systems in noise of varying intensities and fast-acting systems in noise of high intensities.

1.
ANSI
, (
1984
). “
American National Standard: American National Standard preferred frequencies, frequency levels, and band numbers for acoustical measurements
” (American National Standards Institute, New York), ANSI S1.6-1984 (R2006).
2.
ANSI
, (
2004
). “
American National Standard: Method of measurement of performance characteristics of hearing aids under simulated real-ear working conditions
” (American National Standards Institute, New York), ANSI S3.35-2004.
3.
Bentler
,
R. A.
,
Palmer
,
C.
, and
Dittberner
,
A. B.
(
2004
). “
Hearing-in-noise: Comparison of listeners with normal and (aided) impaired hearing
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
15
,
216
225
.
4.
Bentler
,
R. A.
,
Wu
,
Y. H.
, and
Jeon
,
J.
(
2006
). “
Effectiveness of directional technology in open-canal hearing instruments
,”
Hear. J.
59
,
40
47
.
5.
Beranek
,
L. L.
(
1949
).
Acoustic Measurements
(
Wiley
,
London
).
6.
Blamey
,
P. J.
,
Fiket
,
H. J.
, and
Steele
,
B. R.
(
2006
). “
Improving speech intelligibility in background noise with an adaptive directional microphone
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
17
,
519
530
.
7.
Chung
,
K.
(
2004
). “
Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms
,”
Trends Amplif.
8
,
83
124
.
8.
Cox
,
R. M.
,
Alexander
,
G. C.
, and
Gilmore
,
C.
(
1987
). “
Development of the connected speech test (CST)
,”
Ear Hear.
8
,
119S
126S
.
9.
Cox
,
R. M.
, and
McDaniel
,
D. M.
(
1989
). “
Development of the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
32
,
347
352
.
10.
Dirks
,
D. D.
,
Morgan
,
D. E.
, and
Dubno
,
J. R.
(
1982
). “
A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition
,”
J. Speech Hear. Disord.
47
,
114
123
.
11.
Dubno
,
J. R.
,
Dirks
,
D. D.
, and
Morgan
,
D. E.
(
1984
). “
Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
76
,
87
96
.
12.
Everest
,
F. A.
(
2000
).
Master Handbook of Acoustics
(
McGraw Hill
,
Columbus
).
13.
Hagerman
,
B.
, and
Olofsson
,
A.
(
2004
). “
A method to measure the effect of noise reduction algorithms using simultaneous speech and noise
,”
Acta. Acust. Acust.
90
,
356
361
.
14.
Hayes
,
D.
(
2006
). “
Transient impulse control for hearing aids
,”
Hear. Rev.
13
,
56
59
.
15.
Hornsby
,
B. W.
, and
Ricketts
,
T. A.
(
2007
). “
Directional benefit in the presence of speech and speechlike maskers
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
18
,
5
16
.
16.
Kates
,
J. M.
(
2008
).
Digital Hearing Aids
(
Plural
,
San Diego
).
17.
Kuk
,
F.
,
Keenan
,
D.
,
Lau
,
C. C.
, and
Ludvigsen
,
C.
(
2005
). “
Performance of a fully adaptive directional microphone to signals presented from various azimuths
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
16
,
333
347
.
18.
Olson
,
L.
,
Ioannou
,
M.
, and
Trine
,
T. D.
(
2004
). “
Appraising an automatically switching directional system in the real world
,”
Hear. J.
57
,
32
38
.
19.
Palmer
,
C.
,
Bentler
,
R. A.
, and
Mueller
,
H. G.
(
2006
). “
Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: II. Self-report outcomes
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
17
,
190
201
.
20.
Puder
,
H.
(
2006
). “
Adaptive signal processing for interference cancellation in hearing aids
,”
Signal Process.
86
,
1239
1253
.
21.
Ricketts
,
T.
(
2000
). “
Directivity quantification in hearing aids: Fitting and measurement effects
,”
Ear Hear.
21
,
45
58
.
22.
Ricketts
,
T.
, and
Dittberner
,
A. B.
(
2002
). “
Directional amplification for improved signal-to-noise ratio: Strategies, measurement, and limitations
,” in
Strategies For Selecting And Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings
, edited by
M.
Valente
(
Theme
,
New York
), pp.
274
346
.
23.
Ricketts
,
T.
, and
Henry
,
P.
(
2002
). “
Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
41
,
100
112
.
24.
Valente
,
M.
,
Hosford-Dunn
,
H.
, and
Roeser
,
R. J.
(
2000
).
Audiology Treatment
(
Thieme
,
New York
).
25.
Wu
,
Y. H.
, and
Bentler
,
R. A.
(
2007
). “
Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
496
511
.
You do not currently have access to this content.