Over the past several decades, many acoustic markers have been proposed to be sensitive to and measure overall voice quality. This meta-analysis presents a retrospective appraisal of scientific reports, which evaluated the relation between perceived overall voice quality and several acoustic-phonetic correlates. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated using meta-analytic techniques. Correlation coefficients between perceptual judgments and acoustic measures were computed. Where more than one correlation coefficient for a specific acoustic marker was available, a weighted average correlation coefficient was calculated. This was the case in 36 acoustic measures on sustained vowels and in 3 measures on continuous speech. Acoustic measures were ranked according to the strength of the correlation with perceptual voice quality ratings. Acoustic markers with more than one correlation value available in literature and yielding a homogeneous weighted r of 0.60 or above were considered to be superior. The meta-analysis identified four measures that met these criteria in sustained vowels and three measures in continuous speech. Although acoustic measures are routinely utilized in clinical voice examinations, the results of this meta-analysis suggest that caution is warranted regarding the concurrent validity and thus the clinical utility of many of these measures.

1.
Askenfelt
,
A. G.
, and
Hammarberg
,
B.
(
1986
). “
Speech waveform perturbation analysis: A perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
29
,
50
64
.
2.
Awan
,
S. N.
, and
Roy
,
N.
(
2006
). “
Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: A four-factor acoustic model
,”
Clin. Linguist. Phonetics
20
,
35
49
.
3.
Bele
,
I. V.
(
2005
). “
Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality
,”
J. Voice
19
,
555
573
.
4.
Buder
,
E. H.
(
2000
). “
Acoustic analysis of voice quality: A tabulation of algorithms 1902–1990
,” in
Voice Quality Measurement
, edited by
R. D.
Kent
and
M. J.
Ball
(
Singular
,
San Diego, CA
), pp.
119
244
.
5.
De Bodt
,
M.
(
1997
). “
A framework of voice assessment: The relation between subjective and objective parameters in the judgment of normal and pathological voice
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Antwerp
, Antwerp, Belgium.
6.
de Krom
,
G.
(
1993
). “
A cepstrum-based technique for determining a harmonics-to-noise ratio in speech signals
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
36
,
254
266
.
7.
Dejonckere
,
P. H.
(
1998
). “
Cepstral voice analysis: Link with perception and stroboscopy
,”
Rev. Laryngol. Otol. Rhinol. (Bord)
119
,
245
246
.
8.
Dejonckere
,
P. H.
,
Remacle
,
M.
,
Fresnel-Elbaz
,
E.
,
Woisard
,
V.
,
Crevier-Buchman
,
L.
, and
Millet
,
B.
(
1996
). “
Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: Reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements
,”
Rev. Laryngol. Otol. Rhinol. (Bord)
117
,
219
224
.
9.
Dejonckere
,
P. H.
, and
Wieneke
,
G. H.
(
1996
). “
Cepstra of normal and pathological voices: Correlation with acoustic, aerodynamic and perceptual data
,” in
Advances in Clinical Phonetics
,
Studies in Speech Pathology and Clinical Linguistics
Vol.
6
, edited by
M. J.
Ball
and
M.
Duckworth
(
John Benjamins
,
Amsterdam
), pp.
217
227
.
10.
Eadie
,
T. L.
, and
Baylor
,
C. R.
(
2006
). “
The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgments of dysphonic voice
,”
J. Voice
20
,
527
544
.
11.
Eadie
,
T. L.
, and
Doyle
,
P. C.
(
2002
). “
Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
3014
3021
.
12.
Eadie
,
T. L.
, and
Doyle
,
P. C.
(
2005
). “
Classification of dysphonic voice: Acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures
,”
J. Voice
19
,
1
14
.
13.
Feijoo
,
S.
, and
Hernández
,
C.
(
1990
). “
Short-term stability measures for the evaluation of vocal quality
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
33
,
324
334
.
14.
Franzblau
,
A. N.
(
1958
).
A Primer of Statistics for Non-Statisticians
(
Harcourt, Brace & Company
,
New York
).
15.
Frey
,
L. R.
,
Botan
,
C. H.
,
Friedman
,
P. G.
, and
Kreps
,
G. L.
(
1991
).
Investigating Communication: An Introduction to Research Methods
(
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
).
16.
Gorham-Rowan
,
M. M.
, and
Laures-Gore
,
J.
(
2006
). “
Acoustic-perceptual correlates of voice quality in elderly men and women
,”
J. Commun. Disord.
39
,
171
184
.
17.
Halberstam
,
B.
(
2004
). “
Acoustic and perceptual parameters relating to connected speech are more reliable measures of hoarseness than parameters relating to sustained vowels
,”
ORL
66
,
70
73
.
18.
Heman-Ackah
,
Y. D.
,
Heuer
,
R. J.
,
Michael
,
D. D.
,
Ostrowski
,
R.
,
Horman
,
M.
,
Baroody
,
M. M.
,
Hillenbrand
,
J.
, and
Sataloff
,
R. T.
(
2003
). “
Cepstral peak prominence: A more reliable measure of dysphonia
,”
Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.
112
,
324
333
.
19.
Heman-Ackah
,
Y. D.
,
Michael
,
D. D.
, and
Goding
,
G. S.
(
2002
). “
The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia
,”
J. Voice
16
,
20
27
.
20.
Hillenbrand
,
J.
,
Cleveland
,
R. A.
, and
Erickson
,
R. L.
(
1994
). “
Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
37
,
769
778
.
21.
Hillenbrand
,
J.
, and
Houde
,
R. A.
(
1996
). “
Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: Dysphonic voices and continuous speech
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
39
,
311
321
.
22.
Hirano
,
M.
,
Hibi
,
S.
,
Terasawa
,
R.
, and
Masako
,
F.
(
1986
). “
Relationship between aerodynamic, vibratory, acoustic and psychoacoustic correlates in dysphonia
,”
J. Phonetics
14
,
445
456
.
23.
Hunter
,
J. E.
,
Schmidt
,
F. L.
, and
Jackson
,
G. B.
(
1982
).
Meta-Analysis, Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies
(
Sage
,
Beverly Hills, CA
).
24.
Kojima
,
H.
,
Gould
,
W. J.
,
Lambiase
,
A.
, and
Isshiki
,
N.
(
1980
). “
Computer analysis of hoarseness
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol.
89
,
547
554
.
25.
Kreiman
,
J.
, and
Gerratt
,
B.
(
2000a
). “
Measuring vocal quality
,” in
Voice Quality Measurement
, edited by
R. D.
Kent
and
M. J.
Ball
(
Singular
,
San Diego, CA
), pp.
73
101
.
26.
Kreiman
,
J.
, and
Gerratt
,
B.
(
2005
). “
Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
2201
2211
.
27.
Kreiman
,
J.
, and
Gerratt
,
B. R.
(
2000b
). “
Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
1867
1876
.
28.
Kreiman
,
J.
,
Gerratt
,
B. R.
, and
Ito
,
M.
(
2007
). “
When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
2354
2364
.
29.
Kreiman
,
J.
,
Gerratt
,
B. R.
,
Kempster
,
G. B.
,
Erman
,
A.
, and
Berke
,
G. S.
(
1993
). “
Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: Review, tutorial, and a framework for research
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
36
,
21
40
.
30.
Kreiman
,
J.
,
Gerratt
,
B. R.
, and
Precoda
,
K.
(
1990
). “
Listener experience and perception of voice quality
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
33
,
103
115
.
31.
Lipsey
,
M. W.
, and
Wilson
,
D. B.
(
2001
).
Practical Meta-Analysis
(
Sage
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
).
32.
Ma
,
E.
, and
Yiu
,
E.
(
2006
). “
Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity
,”
J. Voice
20
,
380
390
.
33.
Parsa
,
V.
, and
Jamieson
,
D. G.
(
2001
). “
Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: Sustained vowels versus continuous speech
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
44
,
327
339
.
34.
Plant
,
R. L.
,
Hillel
,
A. D.
, and
Waugh
,
P. F.
(
1997
). “
Analysis of voice changes after thyroplasty using linear predictive coding
,”
Laryngoscope
107
,
703
709
.
35.
Prosek
,
R. A.
,
Montgomery
,
A. A.
,
Walden
,
E.
, and
Hawkins
,
D. B.
(
1987
). “
An evaluation of residue features as correlates of voice disorders
,”
J. Commun. Disord.
20
,
105
117
.
36.
Qi
,
Y.
,
Hillman
,
R. E.
, and
Milstein
,
C.
(
1999
). “
The estimation of signal-to-noise ratio in continuous speech for disordered voices
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
2532
2535
.
37.
Titze
,
I. R.
(
1995
).
Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis: Summary Statement
(
National Center for Voice and Speech
,
Iowa City, IA
).
38.
Wolfe
,
V.
,
Fitch
,
J.
, and
Cornell
,
R.
(
1995
). “
Acoustic prediction of severity in commonly occurring voice problems
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
38
,
273
279
.
39.
Wolfe
,
V.
,
Fitch
,
J.
, and
Martin
,
D.
(
1997
). “
Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types
,”
Folia Phoniatr Logop
49
,
292
299
.
40.
Wolfe
,
V.
, and
Martin
,
D.
(
1997
). “
Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: Type and severity
,”
J. Commun. Disord.
30
,
403
416
.
41.
Wolfe
,
V. I.
,
Martin
,
D. P.
, and
Palmer
,
C. I.
(
2000
). “
Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naïve listeners
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
43
,
697
705
.
42.
Wolfe
,
V. I.
, and
Steinfatt
,
T. M.
(
1987
). “
Prediction of vocal severity within and across voice types
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
30
,
230
240
.
43.
Yiu
,
E. M.
,
Chan
,
K. M.
, and
Mok
,
R. S.
(
2007
). “
Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation
,”
Clin. Linguist. Phonetics
21
,
29
45
.
43.
Yu
,
P.
,
Garrel
,
R.
,
Nicollas
,
R.
,
Ouaknine
,
M.
, and
Giovanni
,
A.
(
2007
). “
Objective voice analysis in dysphonic patients: New data including nonlinear measurements
,”
Folia Phoniatr Logop
59
,
20
30
.
44.
Yu
,
P.
,
Ouaknine
,
M.
,
Revis
,
J.
, and
Giovanni
,
A.
(
2001
). “
Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: A multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements
,”
J. Voice
15
,
529
542
.
45.
Yumoto
,
E.
,
Sasaki
,
Y.
, and
Okamura
,
H.
(
1984
). “
Harmonics-to-noise ratio and psychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
27
,
2
6
.
46.
Zraick
,
R. I.
,
Wendel
,
K.
, and
Smith-Olinde
,
L.
(
2005
). “
The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice
,”
J. Voice
19
,
574
581
.
You do not currently have access to this content.