This study aims to characterize the nature of the dynamic spectral change in vowels in three distinct regional varieties of American English spoken in the Western North Carolina, in Central Ohio, and in Southern Wisconsin. The vowels /ɪ, ε, e, æ, aɪ/ were produced by 48 women for a total of 1920 utterances and were contained in words of the structure /bVts/ and /bVdz/ in sentences which elicited nonemphatic and emphatic vowels. Measurements made at the vowel target (i.e., the central 60% of the vowel) produced a set of acoustic parameters which included position and movement in the F1 by F2 space, vowel duration, amount of spectral change [measured as vector length (VL) and trajectory length (TL)], and spectral rate of change. Results revealed expected variation in formant dynamics as a function of phonetic factors (vowel emphasis and consonantal context). However, for each vowel and for each measure employed, dialect was a strong source of variation in vowel-inherent spectral change. In general, the dialect-specific nature and amount of spectral change can be characterized quite effectively by position and movement in the F1 by F2 space, vowel duration, TL (but not VL which underestimates formant movement), and spectral rate of change.
REFERENCES
1.
Adank
, P.
, van Hout
, R.
, and Smits
, R.
(2004
). “An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
, 1729
–1738
.2.
Andruski
, J. E.
, and Nearey
, T. M.
(1992
). “On the sufficiency of compound target specification of isolated vowels and vowels in /bVb/ syllables
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
, 390
–410
.3.
Byrd
, D.
(1994
). “Relations of sex and dialect to reduction
,” Speech Commun.
15
, 39
–54
.4.
Clopper
, C. G.
, Pisoni
, D.
, and de Jong
, K.
(2005
). “Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
, 1661
–1676
.5.
Ferguson
, S. H.
, and Kewley-Port
, D.
(2002
). “Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
, 259
–271
.6.
Fox
, R. A.
(1983
). “Perceptual structure of monophthongs and diphthongs in English
,” Lang Speech
26
, 21
–60
.7.
Gay
, T.
(1968
). “Effect of speaking rate on diphthong formant movements
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
44
, 1570
–1573
.8.
Harrington
, J.
(2006
). “An acoustic analysis of ‘happy-tensing’ in the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts
,” J. Phonetics
34
, 439
–457
.9.
Harrington
, J.
, and Cassidy
, S.
(1994
). “Dynamic and target theories of vowel classification: Evidence from monophthongs and diphthongs in Australian English
,” Lang Speech
37
, 357
–373
.10.
Harrington
, J.
, Kleber
, F.
, and Reubold
, U.
(2008
). “Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
, 2825
–2835
.11.
Hillenbrand
, M.
, and Gayvert
, R. T.
(1993
). “Vowel classification based on fundamental frequency and formant frequencies
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
36
, 694
–700
.12.
Hillenbrand
, J. M.
, and Nearey
, T. M.
(1999
). “Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: Effects of formant contour
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
, 3509
–3523
.13.
Hillenbrand
, J. M.
, Clark
, M. J.
, and Nearey
, T. M.
(2001
). “Effects of consonantal environment on vowel formant patterns
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
, 748
–763
.14.
Hillenbrand
, J. M.
, Getty
, L. A.
, Clark
, M. J.
, and Wheeler
, K.
(1995
). “Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
, 3099
–3111
.15.
Jacewicz
, E.
, Fox
, R. A.
, and Salmons
, J.
(2007
). “Vowel duration in three American English dialects
,” Am. Speech
82
, 367
–385
.16.
Jacewicz
, E.
, Fox
, R. A.
, O’Neill
, K.
, and Salmons
, J.
(2009
). “Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender
,” Lang. Var. Change
21
, 233
–256
.17.
Jacewicz
, E.
, Fujimura
, O.
, and Fox
, R. A.
(2003
). “Dynamics in diphthong perception
,” in Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
, edited by M. J.
Solé
, D.
Recasens
and J.
Romero
, Barcelona, Spain
, pp. 993
–996
.18.
Jenkins
, J. J.
, Strange
, W.
, and Edman
, T.
(1983
). “Identification of vowels in ‘vowelless’ syllables
,” Percept. Psychophys.
34
, 441
–450
.19.
Jenkins
, J. J.
, Strange
, W.
, and Miranda
, S.
(1994
). “Vowel identification in mixed-speaker silent-center syllables
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
, 1030
–1043
.20.
Kewley-Port
, D.
, and Neel
, A.
(1996
). “Perception of dynamic properties of speech: Peripheral and central processes
,” in Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective
, edited by S.
Greenberg
and W. A.
Aisnworth
(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, London
), pp. 49
–61
.21.
Labov
, W.
, Ash
, S.
, and Boberg
, C.
(2006
). Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change
(Mouton de Gruyter
, Berlin
).22.
Lehiste
, I.
, and Peterson
, G.
(1961
). “Transitions glides, and diphthongs
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
33
, 268
–277
.23.
Lindblom
, B.
(1963
). “Spectrographic study of vowel reduction
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
35
, 1773
–1781
.24.
Lindblom
, B.
, Agwuele
, A.
, Sussman
, H. M.
, and Cortes
, E. E.
(2007
). “The effect of emphatic stress on consonant vowel coarticulation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
, 3802
–3813
.25.
Milenkovic
, P.
(2003
). TF32 software program, University of Wisconsin
, Madison, WI.26.
Moon
, S.-J.
, and Lindblom
, B.
(1994
). “Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
, 40
–55
.27.
Morrison
, G. S.
(2009
). “Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
, 2387
–2397
.28.
Nearey
, T. M.
, and Assmann
, P. F.
(1986
). “Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
, 1297
–1308
.29.
Olive
, J. P.
, Greenwood
, A.
, and Coleman
, J.
(1993
). Acoustics of American English Speech
(Springer-Verlag
, New York
).30.
Peterson
, G. E.
, and Lehiste
, I.
(1960
). “Duration of syllable nuclei in English
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
32
, 693
–703
.31.
Pickett
, J. M.
(1999
). The Acoustics of Speech Communication: Fundamentals, Speech Perception Theory, and Technology
(Allyn and Bacon
, Boston, MA
).32.
Strange
, W.
(1987
). “Information for vowels in formant transitions
,” J. Mem. Lang.
26
, 550
–557
.33.
Strange
, W.
(1989
). “Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
, 2135
–2153
.34.
Strange
, W.
, Jenkins
, J. J.
, and Johnson
, T. L.
(1983
). “Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
, 695
–705
.35.
Strange
, W.
, Verbrugge
, R. R.
, Shankweiler
, D. P.
, and Edman
, T. R.
(1976
). “Consonant environment specifies vowel identity
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
60
, 213
–224
.36.
Van Son
, R. J. J. H.
, and Pols
, L. C. W.
(1992
). “Formant movements of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
, 121
–127
.37.
Watson
, C. I.
, and Harrington
, J.
(1999
). “Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
, 458
–468
.38.
Wouters
, J.
, and Macon
, M. W.
(2002a
). “Effects of prosodic factors on spectral dynamics, I. Analysis
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
, 417
–427
.39.
Wouters
, J.
, and Macon
, M. W.
(2002b
). “Effects of prosodic factors on spectral dynamics, II. Synthesis
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
, 428
–438
.40.
Zahorian
, S. A.
, and Jagharghi
, A.
(1993
). “Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
, 1966
–1982
.© 2009 Acoustical Society of America.
2009
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.