Several psychophysical models for masked detection were evaluated using reproducible noises. The data were hit and false-alarm rates from three psychophysical studies of detection of 500-Hz tones in reproducible noise under diotic and dichotic conditions with four stimulus bandwidths (50, 100, 115, and 2900 Hz). Diotic data were best predicted by an energy-based multiple-detector model that linearly combined stimulus energies at the outputs of several critical-band filters. The tone-plus-noise trials in the dichotic data were best predicted by models that linearly combined either the average values or the standard deviations of interaural time and level differences; however, these models offered no predictions for noise-alone responses. The decision variables of more complicated temporal models, including the models of Dau et al. [(1996a). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3615–3622] and Breebaart et al. [(2001a). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1074–1088], were weakly correlated with subjects’ responses. Comparisons of the dependencies of each model on envelope and fine-structure cues to those in the data suggested that dependence upon both envelope and fine structure, as well as an interaction between them, is required to predict the detection results.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
October 2009
October 01 2009
An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises Available to Purchase
Sean A. Davidson;
Sean A. Davidson
Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Institute for Sensory Research,
Syracuse University
, 621 Skytop Road, Syracuse, New York 13244
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert H. Gilkey;
Robert H. Gilkey
Department of Psychology,
Wright State University
, Dayton, Ohio 45435 and Human Effectiveness Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory
, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433
Search for other works by this author on:
H. Steven Colburn;
H. Steven Colburn
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University Hearing Research Center,
Boston University
, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Search for other works by this author on:
Laurel H. Carney
Laurel H. Carney
a)
Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and The Institute for Sensory Research,
Syracuse University
, 621 Skytop Road, Syracuse, New York 13244
Search for other works by this author on:
Sean A. Davidson
Robert H. Gilkey
H. Steven Colburn
Laurel H. Carney
a)
Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, Institute for Sensory Research,
Syracuse University
, 621 Skytop Road, Syracuse, New York 13244a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Also at Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, Box 603, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14642. Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 1906–1925 (2009)
Article history
Received:
August 22 2008
Accepted:
July 27 2009
Connected Content
A companion article has been published:
Diotic and dichotic detection with reproducible chimeric stimuli
Citation
Sean A. Davidson, Robert H. Gilkey, H. Steven Colburn, Laurel H. Carney; An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 October 2009; 126 (4): 1906–1925. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3206583
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Diotic and dichotic detection with reproducible chimeric stimuli
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2009)
The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2005)
The role of across-frequency processes in dichotic listening conditions
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 2009)
Stimulus‐based diotic and dichotic models that combined cues for detection of tones in reproducible noise.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2011)
Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence: Bandwidth effects
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (June 2006)