Speech intelligibility for audio-alone and audiovisual (AV) sentences was estimated as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a female target talker presented in a stationary noise, an interfering male talker, or a speech-modulated noise background, for eight hearing-impaired (HI) and five normal-hearing (NH) listeners. At the 50% keywords-correct performance level, HI listeners showed 7–12 dB less fluctuating-masker benefit (FMB) than NH listeners, consistent with previous results. Both groups showed significantly more FMB under AV than audio-alone conditions. When compared at the same stationary-noise SNR, FMB differences between listener groups and modalities were substantially smaller, suggesting that most of the FMB differences at the 50% performance level may reflect a SNR dependence of the FMB. Still, 15dB of the FMB difference between listener groups remained, indicating a possible role for reduced audibility, limited spectral or temporal resolution, or an inability to use auditory source-segregation cues, in directly limiting the ability to listen in the dips of a fluctuating masker. A modified version of the extended speech-intelligibility index that predicts a larger FMB at less favorable SNRs accounted for most of the FMB differences between listener groups and modalities. Overall, these data suggest that HI listeners retain more of an ability to listen in the dips of a fluctuating masker than previously thought. Instead, the fluctuating-masker difficulties exhibited by HI listeners may derive from the reduced FMB associated with the more favorable SNRs they require to identify a reasonable proportion of the target speech.

1.
Alcántara
,
J. I.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1995
). “
The identification of vowel-like harmonic complexes: Effects of component phase, level, and fundamental frequency
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
3813
3824
.
2.
ANSI
(
1997
).
Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, S3.5
(
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
).
3.
ANSI
(
2004
).
Specification for Audiometers, S3.6
(
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
).
4.
Arbogast
,
T. L.
,
Mason
,
C. R.
, and
Kidd
,
G.
(
2002
). “
The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
2086
2098
.
5.
Auer
,
E. T.
 Jr.
, and
Bernstein
,
L. E.
(
2007
). “
Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
50
,
1157
1165
.
6.
Bacon
,
S. P.
,
Opie
,
J. M.
, and
Montoya
,
D. Y.
(
1998
). “
The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
41
,
549
563
.
7.
Baer
,
T.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1994
). “
Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
2277
2280
.
8.
Bernstein
,
L. E.
,
Demorest
,
M. E.
, and
Tucker
,
P. E.
(
2000
). “
Speech perception without hearing
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
62
,
233
252
.
9.
Bernstein
,
J. G. W.
, and
Oxenham
,
A. J.
(
2006
). “
The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: Sensorineural hearing loss
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
3929
3945
.
10.
Boothroyd
,
A.
(
1990
). “
Articulation index: Importance function in the intensity domain (A)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
S31
.
11.
Braida
,
L. D.
(
1991
). “
Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments
,”
Q. J. Exp. Psychol.
43
,
647
677
.
12.
Brungart
,
D. S.
(
2001
). “
Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
1101
1109
.
13.
Buss
,
E.
,
Hall
,
J. W.
, and
Grose
,
J. H.
(
2004
). “
Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss
,”
Ear Hear.
25
,
242
250
.
14.
Carhart
,
R. C.
, and
Tillman
,
T. W.
(
1970
). “
Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses
,”
Arch. Otolaryngol.
91
,
273
279
.
15.
Darwin
,
C. J.
, and
Hukin
,
R. W.
(
2000
). “
Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
970
977
.
16.
Driver
,
J.
(
1996
). “
Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading
,”
Nature (London)
381
,
66
68
.
17.
Dubno
,
J. R.
,
Horwitz
,
A. R.
, and
Ahlstrom
,
J. B.
(
2003
). “
Recovery from prior stimulation: Masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with impaired hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
2084
2094
.
18.
Eisenberg
,
L. S.
,
Dirks
,
D. D.
, and
Bell
,
T. S.
(
1995
). “
Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
38
,
222
233
.
19.
Festen
,
J. M.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1990
). “
Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
1725
1736
.
20.
Fletcher
,
H.
(
1922
). “
The nature of speech and its interpretation
,”
Bell Syst. Tech. J.
1
,
129
144
.
21.
Freyman
,
R. L.
,
Balakrishnan
,
U.
, and
Helfer
,
K. S.
(
2001
). “
Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
2112
2122
.
22.
Freyman
,
R. L.
,
Balakrishnan
,
U.
, and
Helfer
,
K. S.
(
2004
). “
Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
2246
2256
.
23.
Freyman
,
R. L.
,
Balakrishnan
,
U.
, and
Helfer
,
K. S.
(
2008
). “
Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
1627
1637
.
24.
Freyman
,
R. L.
,
Helfer
,
K. S.
,
McCall
,
D. D.
, and
Clifton
,
R. K.
(
1999
). “
The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
3578
3588
.
25.
George
,
E. L. J.
,
Festen
,
J. M.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
2006
). “
Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
2295
2311
.
26.
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1986
). “
Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
,
1020
1033
.
27.
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1989
). “
Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech
,”
Scand. Audiol. Suppl.
32
,
1
25
.
28.
Grant
,
K. W.
(
2001
). “
The effect of speechreading on masked detection thresholds for filtered speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
2272
2275
.
29.
Grant
,
K. W.
, and
Seitz
,
P.
(
2000
). “
The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
1197
1208
.
30.
Grant
,
K. W.
, and
Walden
,
B. E.
(
1996
). “
Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual consonant recognition
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
2415
2424
.
31.
Helfer
,
K. S.
, and
Freyman
,
R. L.
(
2005
). “
The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
842
849
.
32.
Hopkins
,
K.
,
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Stone
,
M. A.
(
2008
). “
Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure in speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
1140
1153
.
33.
Hygge
,
S.
,
Rönnberg
,
J.
,
Larsby
,
B.
, and
Arlinger
,
S.
(
1992
). “
Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects’ ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
35
,
208
215
.
34.
IEEE
(
1969
).
IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measures
(
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
,
New York
).
35.
Jin
,
S. H.
, and
Nelson
,
P. B.
(
2006
). “
Speech perception in gated noise: The effects of temporal resolution
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
3097
3108
.
36.
Kwon
,
B. J.
, and
Turner
,
C. W.
(
2001
). “
Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: Masking release or modulation interference?
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
1130
1140
.
37.
Lorenzi
,
C.
,
Gilbert
,
G.
,
Carn
,
H.
,
Garnier
,
S.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
2006a
). “
Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
103
,
18866
18869
.
38.
Lorenzi
,
C.
,
Husson
,
M.
,
Ardoint
,
M.
, and
Debruille
,
X.
(
2006b
). “
Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: Effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception
,”
Int. J. Audiol.
45
,
487
495
.
39.
Ludvigsen
,
C.
(
1985
). “
Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
78
,
1271
1280
.
40.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Hopkins
,
K.
(
2006
). “
Frequency discrimination of complex tones by hearing-impaired subjects: Evidence for loss of ability to use temporal fine structure
,”
Hear. Res.
222
,
16
27
.
41.
Nelson
,
D. A.
,
Schroder
,
A. C.
, and
Wojtczak
,
M.
(
2001
). “
A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
2045
2064
.
42.
Nilsson
,
M.
,
Soli
,
S.
, and
Sullivan
,
J. A.
(
1994
). “
Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
95
,
1085
1099
.
43.
Oxenham
,
A. J.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1997
). “
Modeling the effects of peripheral nonlinearity in normal and impaired hearing
,” in
Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss
, edited by
W.
Jesteadt
(
Erlbaum
,
Hillsdale, NJ
), pp.
273
288
.
44.
Oxenham
,
A. J.
, and
Simonson
,
A. M.
(
2009
). “
Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
125
,
457
468
.
45.
Peters
,
R. W.
,
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Baer
,
T.
(
1998
). “
Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
577
587
.
46.
Plomp
,
R.
, and
Mimpen
,
A. M.
(
1979
). “
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences
,”
Audiology
18
,
43
53
.
47.
Qin
,
M. K.
, and
Oxenham
,
A. J.
(
2003
). “
Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
114
,
446
454
.
48.
Rabinowitz
,
W. M.
,
Eddington
,
D. K.
,
Delhorne
,
L. A.
, and
Cuneo
,
P. A.
(
1992
). “
Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
1869
1881
.
49.
Rhebergen
,
K. S.
, and
Versfeld
,
N. J.
(
2005
). “
A speech intelligibility index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
2181
2192
.
50.
Rhebergen
,
K. S.
,
Versfeld
,
N. J.
, and
Dreschler
,
W. A.
(
2006
). “
Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
3988
3997
.
51.
Rhebergen
,
K. S.
,
Versfeld
,
N. J.
, and
Dreschler
,
W. A.
(
2008
). “
Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing
,”
Ear Hear.
29
,
169
175
.
52.
Simpson
,
A. M.
,
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1990
). “
Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol., Suppl.
469
,
101
107
.
53.
Steeneken
,
H. J. M.
, and
Houtgast
,
T.
(
1980
). “
A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
,
318
326
.
54.
Stuart
,
A.
(
2008
). “
Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet, continuous noise, and interrupted noise in school-age children
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
19
,
135
146
.
55.
Studebaker
,
G. A.
, and
Sherbecoe
,
R. L.
(
2002
). “
Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
1422
1436
.
56.
Summers
,
V.
, and
Leek
,
M. R.
(
1998
). “
Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,”
Hear. Res.
118
,
139
150
.
57.
Summers
,
V.
, and
Molis
,
M. R.
(
2004
). “
Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: Effects of hearing loss and presentation level
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
47
,
245
256
.
58.
Takahashi
,
G. A.
, and
Bacon
,
S. P.
(
1992
). “
Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
35
,
1410
1421
.
59.
ter Keurs
,
M.
,
Festen
,
J. M.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1993
). “
Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception II
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
1547
1552
.
60.
Tyler
,
R. S.
,
Summerfield
,
A. Q.
,
Wood
,
E. J.
, and
Fernandes
,
M. A.
(
1982
). “
Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
,
740
752
.
61.
Versfeld
,
N. J.
, and
Dreschler
,
W. A.
(
2002
). “
The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
401
408
.
62.
Walden
,
B. E.
,
Erdman
,
S. A.
,
Montgomery
,
A. A.
,
Schwartz
,
D. M.
, and
Prosek
,
R. A.
(
1981
). “
Some effects of training on speech recognition by hearing-impaired adults
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
24
,
207
216
.
63.
Wightman
,
F.
,
Kistler
,
D.
, and
Brungart
,
D.
(
2006
). “
Informational masking of speech in children: Auditory-visual integration
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
3940
3949
.
64.
Wilson
,
R. H.
,
Carnell
,
C. S.
, and
Cleghorn
,
A. L.
(
2007
). “
The words-in-noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
18
,
522
529
.
You do not currently have access to this content.