Wind noise can be a significant problem for hearing instrument users. This study examined the polar characteristics of flow noise at outputs of two behind-the-ear digital hearing aids, and a microphone mounted on the surface of a cylinder at flow velocities ranging from a gentle breeze (4.5 m/s) to a strong gale (22.5 m/s) . The hearing aids were programed in an anechoic chamber, and tested in a quiet wind tunnel for flow noise recordings. Flow noise levels were estimated by normalizing the overall gain of the hearing aids to 0 dB. The results indicated that the two hearing aids had similar flow noise characteristics: The noise level was generally the lowest when the microphone faced upstream, higher when the microphone faced downstream, and the highest for frontal and rearward incidence angles. Directional microphones often generated higher flow noise level than omnidirectional microphones but they could reduce far-field background noise, resulting in a lower ambient noise level than omnidirectional microphones. Data for the academic microphone- on-cylinder configuration suggested that both turbulence and flow impingement might have contributed to the generation of flow noise in the hearing aids. Clinical and engineering design applications are discussed.

1.
Anderson
,
J. D.
(
2005
).
Fundamentals of Aerodynamics
, 4th ed. (
McGraw-Hill Science Engineering
,
New York, NY
).
2.
Beard
,
J.
, and
Nepomuceno
,
H.
(
2001
). “
Wind noise levels for an ITE hearing aid
,” Knowles Engineering Report No. 128, Revision A., Itasca, IL.
3.
Brown
,
D. V.
, and
Mongeau
,
L. M.
(
1995
). “
The design, construction, and validation of a small, low-speed, quiet wind tunnel with application to noise from the flow over a cavity
,” Internal Report No. 204, HL95–9, Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
4.
Burkhard
,
M. D.
, and
Sachs
,
R. M.
(
1975
). “
Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
58
,
214
222
.
5.
Chung
,
K.
(
2004
). “
Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I: Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms
,”
Trends Amplif.
8
,
83
124
.
7.
Grenner
,
J.
,
Abrahamsson
,
U.
,
Jernberg
,
B.
, and
Lindblad
,
S.
(
2000
). “
A comparison of wind noise in four hearing instruments
,”
Scand. Audiol.
29
,
171
174
.
8.
Kochkin
,
S.
(
2000
). “
MarkeTrak V: Why my hearing aids are in the drawer: The consumers’ perspective
,”
Hear J.
33
,
35
41
.
9.
Kochkin
,
S.
(
2005
). “
MarkeTrak VII: Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age
,”
Hear J.
,
38
,
30
37
.
10.
Leeuw
,
A. R.
, and
Dreschler
,
W. A.
(
1991
). “
Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics
,”
Audiology
30
,
330
344
.
11.
National Climate Data Center
, “
Minimum wind noise
,” http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/ccd/maxwnd.txt (Last viewed June, 2006a).
11.
National Climate Data Center
, “
Minimum wind noise
,” http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/ccd/maxwnd.txt (Last viewed June, 2006b).
12.
Ricketts
,
T. A.
, and
Hornsby
,
B. W.
(
2003
). “
Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit
,”
Ear Hear.
24
,
472
484
.
13.
Thompson
,
S.
, and
Dillon
,
H.
(
2002
). “
Wind noise in hearing aids
,” presented at the
American Academy of Audiology Convention
, Philadelphia, PA.
14.
Yip
,
M. K.
, “
Revealing the magic in everyday: The science of soccer
,” www.physics.hku.hk/~phys0607/lectures/chap05.html (Last viewed May, 2007).
You do not currently have access to this content.