The functional sensorimotor nature of speech production has been demonstrated in studies examining speech adaptation to auditory and/or somatosensory feedback manipulations. These studies have focused primarily on flexible motor processes to explain their findings, without considering modifications to sensory representations resulting from the adaptation process. The present study explores whether the perceptual representation of the /s-ʃ/ contrast may be adjusted following the alteration of auditory feedback during the production of /s/-initial words. Consistent with prior studies of speech adaptation, talkers exposed to the feedback manipulation were found to adapt their motor plans for /s/-production in order to compensate for the effects of the sensory perturbation. In addition, a shift in the /s-ʃ/ category boundary was observed that reduced the functional impact of the auditory feedback manipulation by increasing the perceptual “distance” between the category boundary and subjects’ altered /s/-stimuli—a pattern of perceptual adaptation that was not observed in two separate control groups. These results suggest that speech adaptation to altered auditory feedback is not limited to the motor domain, but rather involves changes in both motor output and auditory representations of speech sounds that together act to reduce the impact of the perturbation.

1.
Abbs
,
J. H.
, and
Gracco
,
V. L.
(
1984
). “
Control of complex motor gestures: Orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
51
,
705
723
.
2.
Baum
,
S. R.
, and
McFarland
,
D. H.
(
1997
). “
The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
,
2353
2359
.
3.
Baum
,
S. R.
, and
McFarland
,
D. H.
, (
2000
). “
Individual differences in speech adaptation to an artificial palate
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
3572
3575
.
4.
Behrens
,
S. J.
, and
Blumstein
,
S. E.
(
1988
). “
Acoustic characteristics of English voiceless fricatives: A descriptive analysis
,”
J. Phonetics
16
,
295
298
.
5.
Berkeley
,
G.
, (
1709
). “
An essay towards a new theory of vision
,” in
The Works of George Berkeley
, edited by
A. A.
Luce
and
T. E.
Jessop
(
Nelson
,
London
).
6.
Bertelson
,
P.
,
Vroomen
,
J.
, and
De Gelder
,
B.
, (
2003
). “
Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect
,”
Psychol. Sci.
14
,
592
597
.
7.
Blumstein
,
S. E.
,
Stevens
,
K. N.
, and
Nigro
,
G. N.
(
1977
). “
Property detectors for bursts and transitions in speech perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
1301
1313
.
8.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
, and
Bent
,
T.
, (
2008
). “
Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech
,”
Cognition
106
,
707
729
.
9.
Cheesman
,
M. F.
, and
Greenwood
,
K. G.
(
1995
). “
Selective adaptation by context-conditioned fricatives
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
531
538
.
10.
Clarke
,
C. M.
, and
Garrett
,
M. F.
, (
2004
). “
Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
3647
3658
.
11.
Cooper
,
W. E.
, and
Lauritsen
,
M. R.
(
1974
). “
Feature processing in the perception and production of speech
,”
Nature (London)
252
,
121
123
.
12.
Cooper
,
W. E.
, and
Nager
,
R. M.
(
1975
). “
Perceptuo-motor adaptation to speech: An analysis of bisyllabic utterances and a neural model
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
58
,
256
266
.
13.
Eimas
,
P. D.
, and
Corbit
,
J. D.
(
1973
). “
Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors
,”
Cogn. Psychol.
4
,
99
109
.
14.
Elman
,
J. L.
(
1981
). “
Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
70
,
45
50
.
15.
Fadiga
,
L.
,
Craighero
,
L.
,
Buccino
,
G.
, and
Rizzolatti
,
G.
, (
2002
). “
Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study
,”
Eur. J. Neurosci.
15
,
399
402
.
16.
Festinger
,
L.
,
Burnham
,
C. A.
,
Ono
,
H.
, and
Bamber
,
D.
(
1967
). “
Efference and the conscious experience of perception
,”
J. Exp. Psychol.
74
,
1
36
.
17.
Galantucci
,
B.
,
Fowler
,
C. A.
, and
Turvey
,
M. T.
, (
2006
). “
The motor theory of speech perception reviewed
,”
Psychon. Bull. Rev.
13
,
361
377
.
18.
Gentilucci
,
M.
, and
Bernardis
,
P.
, (
2007
). “
Imitation during phoneme production
,”
Neuropsychologia
45
,
608
615
.
19.
Gracco
,
V. L.
, and
Abbs
,
J. H.
(
1985
). “
Dynamic control of the perioral system during speech: Kinematic analyses of autogenic and nonautogenic sensorimotor processes
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
54
,
418
432
.
20.
Guenther
,
F. H.
(
1995
). “
Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production
,”
Psychol. Rev.
102
,
594
621
.
21.
Guenther
,
F. H.
, (
2006
). “
Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds
,”
J. Commun. Disord.
39
,
350
365
.
22.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
(
1998
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production
,”
Science
279
,
1213
1216
.
23.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
, (
2002
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
45
,
295
310
.
24.
Jamieson
,
D. G.
, and
Cheesman
,
M. F.
(
1987
). “
The adaptation of produced voice-onset time
,”
J. Phonetics
15
,
15
27
.
25.
Jones
,
J. A.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
, (
2000
). “
Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
1246
1251
.
26.
Jones
,
J. A.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
, (
2003
). “
Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: The role of auditory feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
532
543
.
27.
Jones
,
J. A.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
, (
2005
). “
Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production
,”
Curr. Biol.
15
,
1768
1772
.
28.
Jongman
,
A.
,
Wayland
,
R.
, and
Wong
,
S.
, (
2000
). “
Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
1252
1263
.
29.
Kawahara
,
H.
(
1995
). “
Hearing voice: Transformed auditory feedback effects on voice pitch control
,” Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’95) Workshop on Computational Auditory Scene Analysis, pp.
143
148
.
30.
Kawato
,
M.
(
1999
). “
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning
,”
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
9
,
718
727
.
31.
Kraljic
,
T.
, and
Samuel
,
A. G.
, (
2005
). “
Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?
,”
Cognit Psychol.
51
,
141
178
.
32.
Ladefoged
,
P.
, and
Broadbent
,
D. E.
(
1957
). “
Information conveyed by vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
29
,
98
104
.
33.
Lane
,
H.
,
Denny
,
M.
,
Guenther
,
F. H.
,
Hanson
,
H. M.
,
Marrone
,
N.
,
Matthies
,
M. L.
,
Perkell
,
J. S.
,
Stockmann
,
E.
,
Tiede
,
M.
,
Vick
,
J.
, and
Zandipour
,
M.
, (
2007
). “
On the structure of phoneme categories in listeners with cochlear implants
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
50
,
2
14
.
34.
Liberman
,
A. M.
,
Cooper
,
F. S.
,
Shankweiler
,
D. P.
, and
Studdert-Kennedy
,
M.
(
1967
). “
Perception of the speech code
,”
Psychol. Rev.
74
,
431
461
.
35.
Liberman
,
A. M.
, and
Mattingly
,
I. G.
(
1985
). “
The motor theory of speech perception revised
,”
Cognition
21
,
1
36
.
36.
Liberman
,
A. M.
, and
Whalen
,
D. H.
, (
2000
). “
On the relation of speech to language
,”
Trends Cogn. Sci.
4
,
187
196
.
37.
Mann
,
V. A.
, and
Repp
,
B. H.
(
1980
). “
Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [zh]-[s] distinction
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
28
,
213
228
.
38.
Mann
,
V. A.
, and
Repp
,
B. H.
(
1981
). “
Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
69
,
548
558
.
39.
McQueen
,
J. M.
,
Norris
,
D.
, and
Cutler
,
A.
, (
2006
). “
The dynamic nature of speech perception
,”
Lang Speech
49
,
101
112
.
40.
Meister
,
I. G.
,
Wilson
,
S. M.
,
Deblieck
,
C.
,
Wu
,
A. D.
, and
Iacoboni
,
M.
, (
2007
). “
The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception
,”
Curr. Biol.
17
,
1692
1696
.
41.
Miller
,
J. L.
, and
Liberman
,
A. M.
(
1979
). “
Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
25
,
457
465
.
42.
Nasir
,
S. M.
, and
Ostry
,
D. J.
, (
2006
). “
Somatosensory precision in speech production
,”
Curr. Biol.
16
,
1918
1923
.
43.
Nearey
,
T. M.
(
1989
). “
Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
2088
2113
.
44.
Norris
,
D.
,
McQueen
,
J. M.
, and
Cutler
,
A.
, (
2003
). “
Perceptual learning in speech
,”
Cognit Psychol.
47
,
204
238
.
45.
Perkell
,
J. S.
,
Matthies
,
M. L.
,
Lane
,
H.
,
Guenther
,
F. H.
,
Wilhelms-Tricarico
,
R.
,
Wozniak
,
J.
, and
Guiod
,
P.
(
1997
). “
Speech motor control: Acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models
,”
Speech Commun.
22
,
227
250
.
46.
Pulvermuller
,
F.
,
Huss
,
M.
,
Kherif
,
F.
,
Moscoso del Prado Martin
,
F.
,
Hauk
,
O.
, and
Shtyrov
,
Y.
, (
2006
). “
Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
103
,
7865
7870
.
47.
Purcell
,
D. W.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
, (
2006a
). “
Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
966
977
.
48.
Purcell
,
D. W.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
, (
2006b
). “
Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
2288
2297
.
49.
Sams
,
M.
,
Mottonen
,
R.
, and
Sihvonen
,
T.
, (
2005
). “
Seeing and hearing others and oneself talk
,”
Brain Res. Cognit. Brain Res.
23
,
429
435
.
50.
Savariaux
,
C.
,
Perrier
,
P.
, and
Orliaquet
,
J. P.
(
1995
). “
Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
2428
2422
.
51.
Sawusch
,
J. R.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1976
). “
Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
23
,
125
131
.
52.
Skipper
,
J. I.
,
van Wassenhove
,
V.
,
Nusbaum
,
H. C.
, and
Small
,
S. L.
, (
2007
). “
Hearing lips and seeing voices: How cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception
,”
Cereb. Cortex
17
,
2387
2399
.
53.
Tourville
,
J. A.
,
Reilly
,
K. J.
, and
Guenther
,
F. H.
, (
2008
). “
Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech
,”
Neuroimage
39
,
1429
1443
.
54.
Tremblay
,
S.
,
Shiller
,
D. M.
, and
Ostry
,
D. J.
, (
2003
). “
Somatosensory basis of speech production
,”
Nature (London)
423
,
866
869
.
55.
Villacorta
,
V. M.
,
Perkell
,
J. S.
, and
Guenther
,
F. H.
, (
2007
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
2306
2319
.
56.
Washburn
,
M. F.
(
1926
). “
Gestalt psychology and motor psychology
,”
Am. J. Psychol.
37
,
516
520
.
57.
Watkins
,
K. E.
,
Strafella
,
A. P.
, and
Paus
,
T.
, (
2003
). “
Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production
,”
Neuropsychologia
41
,
989
994
.
58.
Wilson
,
S. M.
,
Saygin
,
A. P.
,
Sereno
,
M. I.
, and
Iacoboni
,
M.
, (
2004
). “
Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production
,”
Nat. Neurosci.
7
,
701
702
.
You do not currently have access to this content.