Talkers show sensitivity to a range of perturbations of auditory feedback (e.g., manipulation of vocal amplitude, fundamental frequency and formant frequency). Here, 50 subjects spoke a monosyllable (“head”), and the formants in their speech were shifted in real time using a custom signal processing system that provided feedback over headphones. First and second formants were altered so that the auditory feedback matched subjects’ production of “had.” Three different instructions were tested: (1) control, in which subjects were naïve about the feedback manipulation, (2) ignore headphones, in which subjects were told that their voice might sound different and to ignore what they heard in the headphones, and (3) avoid compensation, in which subjects were informed in detail about the manipulation and were told not to compensate. Despite explicit instruction to ignore the feedback changes, subjects produced a robust compensation in all conditions. There were no differences in the magnitudes of the first or second formant changes between groups. In general, subjects altered their vowel formant values in a direction opposite to the perturbation, as if to cancel its effects. These results suggest that compensation in the face of formant perturbation is relatively automatic, and the response is not easily modified by conscious strategy.

1.
Bauer
,
J. J.
,
Mittal
,
J.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
, and
Hain
,
T. C.
(
2006
). “
Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: An automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
2363
2371
.
2.
Brainard
,
M. S.
, and
Doupe
,
A. J.
(
2000
). “
Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour
,”
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
1
,
31
40
.
3.
Burnett
,
T. A.
,
Freedland
,
M. B.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
, and
Hain
,
T. C.
(
1998
). “
Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3153
3161
.
4.
Cooper
,
W. E.
,
Billings
,
D.
and
Cole
,
R. A.
(
1976
). “
Articulatory effects on speech perception: A second report
,”
J. Phonetics
4
,
219
232
.
5.
Cowie
,
R.
, and
Douglas-Cowie
,
E.
(
1992
).
Postlingually Acquired Deafness: Speech Deterioration and the Wider Consequences
(
Mouton de Gruyter
,
New York
).
6.
Davis
,
M. H.
,
Johnsrude
,
I. S.
,
Hervais-Adelman
,
A.
,
Taylor
,
K.
, and
McGettigan
,
C.
(
2005
). “
Learning to understand noise-vocoded speech. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.
134
,
222
241
.
7.
Epstein
,
W.
(
1967
).
Varieties of Perceptual Learning
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
).
8.
Fitch
,
W. T.
, and
Giedd
,
J.
(
1999
). “
Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
(
3
),
1511
1522
.
9.
Gracco
,
V. L.
and
Abbs
,
J. H.
(
1985
). “
Dynamic control of the perioral system during speech: Kinematic analyses of autogenic and nonautogenic sensorimotor processes
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
54
,
418
432
.
10.
Hain
,
T. C.
,
Burnett
,
T. A.
,
Kiran
,
S.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
,
Singh
,
S.
, and
Kenney
,
M. K.
(
2000
). “
Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex
,”
Exp. Brain Res.
130
,
133
41
.
11.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
(
1998
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production
,”
Science
279
,
1213
1216
.
12.
Kawahara
,
H.
(
1995
). “
Transformed auditory feedback: The collection of data from 1993.1 to 1994.12 by a new set of analysis procedures
,” TRH-120, ATR Human Information Processing Research Laboratories, Kyoto, pp.
1
52
.
13.
Kraljic
,
T.
,
Samuel
,
A. G.
, and
Brennan
,
S. E.
(
2008
). “
First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability
,”
Psychol. Sci.
19
,
332
338
.
14.
Lane
,
H.
, and
Tranel
,
B.
(
1971
). “
Lombard Sign and Role of Hearing in Speech
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
14
,
677
709
.
15.
Maye
,
J.
,
Weiss
,
D. J.
, and
Aslin
,
R. N.
(
2008
). “
Statistical phonetic learning in infants: Facilitation and feature generalization
,”
Dev. Sci.
11
,
122
134
.
16.
Nassir
,
S. M.
, and
Ostry
,
D. J.
(
2006
). “
Somatosensory precision in speech production
,”
Curr. Biol.
16
,
1918
1923
.
17.
Newman
,
R.
(
2003
). “
Using links between speech perception and speech production to evaluate different acoustic metrics: A preliminary report
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
2850
2860
.
18.
Norris
,
D.
,
McQueen
,
J. M.
, and
Cutler
,
A.
(
2003
) “
Perceptual learning in speech
,”
Cogn. Psychol.
47
,
204
238
.
19.
Orfandidis
,
S. J.
(
1988
).
Optimum Signal Processing: An Introduction
(
MacMillan
,
New York
).
20.
Perkell
,
J. S.
(
1996
). “
Properties of the tongue help to define vowel categories: Hypotheses based on physiologically-oriented modeling
,”
J. Phonetics
24
,
3
22
.
21.
Pick
,
H. L.
, Jr.
,
Siegel
,
G. M.
,
Fox
,
P. W.
,
Garber
,
S. R.
, and
Kearney
,
J. K.
(
1989
). “
Inhibiting the Lombard effect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
894
900
.
22.
Prochazka
,
A.
,
Clarac
,
F.
,
Loeb
,
G. E.
,
Rothwell
,
J. C.
, and
Wolpaw
,
J. R.
. (
2000
). “
What do reflex and voluntary mean? Modern views on an ancient debate
,”
Exp. Brain Res.
130
,
417
432
.
23.
Purcell
,
D. W.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2006
). “
Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
120
,
966
977
.
24.
Scheifele
,
P. M.
,
Andrew
,
S.
,
Cooper
,
R. A.
,
Darre
,
M.
,
Musiek
,
F. E.
, and
Max
,
L.
(
2005
). “
Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River beluga
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
1486
1492
.
25.
Smotherman
,
M.
(
2007
). “
Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations
,”
Behav. Brain Res.
182
,
315
326
.
26.
Tremblay
,
S.
,
Shiller
,
D. M.
and
Ostry
,
D. J.
(
2003
). “
Somatosensory basis of speech production
,”
Nature (London)
423
,
866
869
.
27.
Van Linden
,
S.
, and
Vroomen
,
J.
(
2007
). “
Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
33
,
1483
1494
.
28.
Villacorta
,
V. M.
,
Perkell
,
J. S.
, and
Guenther
,
F. H.
(
2007
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
122
,
2306
2319
.
29.
Vorperian
,
H. K.
,
Kent
,
R. D.
,
Lindstrom
,
M. J.
,
Kalina
,
C. M.
,
Gentry
,
L. R.
, and
Yandell
,
B. S.
(
2005
). “
Development of vocal tract length during early childhood: A magnetic resonance imaging study
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
,
338
350
.
30.
Weerdesteyn
,
V.
,
Laing
,
A. C.
, and
Robinovitch
,
S. N.
(
2008
). “
Automated postural responses are modified in a functional manner by instruction
,”
Exp. Brain Res.
186
,
571
580
.
31.
Wolpaw
,
J. R.
(
2007
). “
Spinal cord plasticity in acquisition and maintenance of motor skills
,”
Acta Physiol.
189
,
155
169
.
32.
Wolpert
,
D. M.
, and
Kawato
,
M.
(
1998
). “
Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control
,”
Neural Networks
11
,
1317
1329
.
33.
Zarate
,
J. M.
, and
Zatorre
,
R. J.
(
2008
). “
Experience-dependent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation during singing
,”
Neuroimage
40
,
1871
1887
.
You do not currently have access to this content.