Talkers show sensitivity to a range of perturbations of auditory feedback (e.g., manipulation of vocal amplitude, fundamental frequency and formant frequency). Here, 50 subjects spoke a monosyllable (“head”), and the formants in their speech were shifted in real time using a custom signal processing system that provided feedback over headphones. First and second formants were altered so that the auditory feedback matched subjects’ production of “had.” Three different instructions were tested: (1) control, in which subjects were naïve about the feedback manipulation, (2) ignore headphones, in which subjects were told that their voice might sound different and to ignore what they heard in the headphones, and (3) avoid compensation, in which subjects were informed in detail about the manipulation and were told not to compensate. Despite explicit instruction to ignore the feedback changes, subjects produced a robust compensation in all conditions. There were no differences in the magnitudes of the first or second formant changes between groups. In general, subjects altered their vowel formant values in a direction opposite to the perturbation, as if to cancel its effects. These results suggest that compensation in the face of formant perturbation is relatively automatic, and the response is not easily modified by conscious strategy.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2009
January 01 2009
Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate
K. G. Munhall;
K. G. Munhall
a)
Department of Psychology and Department of Otolaryngology,
Queen’s University
, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
E. N. MacDonald;
E. N. MacDonald
Department of Psychology and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Queen’s University
, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
S. K. Byrne;
S. K. Byrne
Department of Psychology
Queen’s University
, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
I. Johnsrude
I. Johnsrude
Department of Psychology
Queen’s University
, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 384–390 (2009)
Article history
Received:
July 29 2008
Accepted:
October 30 2008
Citation
K. G. Munhall, E. N. MacDonald, S. K. Byrne, I. Johnsrude; Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 January 2009; 125 (1): 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3035829
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2006)
Linguistic initiation signals increase auditory feedback error correction
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2017)
Speech formant changes due to repeated measurements, instruction, and simulated environments using both automated and manual feature extraction
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2018)
Does the production of speech necessarily rely on auditory feedback?
J Acoust Soc Am (May 2007)
Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (February 2010)