The Huggins pitch is a sensation of pitch generated from a broadband noise having a narrowband boundary region where the interaural phase difference varies rapidly as a function of frequency. Models of binaural hearing predict that the pitch image should be well lateralized. A direct psychophysical experimental method was used to estimate the lateral positions of Huggins pitch images with two different forms of phase boundaries, linear phase and stepped phase. A third experiment measured the lateral positions of sine tones with controlled interaural phase differences. The results showed that the lateralization of Huggins pitch stimuli was similar to that of the corresponding sine tones and that the lateralizations of the two forms of Huggins pitch phase boundaries were even more similar to one another. Both Huggins pitches and sine tones revealed strong laterality compression (exponent). Ambiguous stimuli, with an interaural phase difference of 180°, were consistently lateralized on one side or the other according to individual asymmetries—an effect called “earedness.” An appendix to this article develops a new first-order lateralization model, the salient phase density model, which combines attributes of previous models of dichotic pitch lateralization.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2008
December 01 2008
Lateralization of Huggins pitch
Peter Xinya Zhang;
Peter Xinya Zhang
a)
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Michigan State University
, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Search for other works by this author on:
William M. Hartmann
William M. Hartmann
b)
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Michigan State University
, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
b)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 3873–3887 (2008)
Article history
Received:
June 25 2006
Accepted:
July 29 2008
Citation
Peter Xinya Zhang, William M. Hartmann; Lateralization of Huggins pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 December 2008; 124 (6): 3873–3887. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2977683
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
On the lateralization of the Huggins pitch
J Acoust Soc Am (October 2002)
Pitch discrimination interference between binaural and monaural or diotic pitches
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2009)
Dichotic pitches as illusions of binaural unmasking. I. Huggins’ pitch and the “binaural edge pitch”
J Acoust Soc Am (June 1998)
On the dichotic pitch of simultaneously presented interaurally delayed white noises. Implications for binaural theory
J Acoust Soc Am (July 2000)
Melody recognition using three types of dichotic-pitch stimulus
J Acoust Soc Am (September 2001)