The relations between production and perception in 4-year-old children were examined in a study of compensation strategies for a lip-tube perturbation. Acoustic and perceptual analyses of the rounded vowel [u] produced by twelve 4-year-old French speakers were conducted under two conditions: normal and with a 15-mm-diam tube inserted between the lips. Recordings of isolated vowels were made in the normal condition before any perturbation (N1), immediately upon insertion of the tube and for the next 19 trials in this perturbed condition, with (P2) or without articulatory instructions (P1), and in the normal condition after the perturbed trials (N2). The results of the acoustic analyses reveal speaker-dependent alterations of F1, F2, and/or F0 in the perturbed conditions and after the removal of the tube. For some subjects, the presence of the tube resulted in very little change; for others, an increase in F2 was observed in P1, which was generally reduced in some of the 20 repetitions, but not systematically and not continuously. The use of articulatory instructions provided in the P2 condition was detrimental to the achievement of a good acoustic target. Perceptual data are used to determine optimal combinations of F0, F1, and F2 (in bark) related to these patterns. The data are compared to a previous study conducted with adults [Savariaux et al, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.106, 381393 (1999)].

1.
Aasland
,
W. A.
,
Baum
,
S. R.
, and
McFarland
,
D. H.
(
2006
). “
Electropalatographic, acoustic, and perceptual data on adaptation to a palatal perturbation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
2372
2381
.
2.
Atal
,
B. S.
, and
Schroeder
,
M. R.
(
1974
). “
Recent advances in predictive coding—Applications to speech synthesis
,” in
Speech Communication
, edited by
G.
Fant
, (
Almqvist and Wiksell
,
Stockholm, Sweden
), Vol.
1
, pp.
27
31
.
3.
Badin
,
P.
, and
Fant
,
G.
(
1984
). “
Notes on vocal tract computation
,”
STL-QPSR
2-3
,
53
108
.
4.
Baum
,
S. R.
, and
Katz
,
W. F. K.
(
1988
). “
Acoustic analysis of compensatory articulation in children
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
,
1662
1668
.
5.
Boë
,
L.-J.
, and
Maeda
,
S.
(
1997
). “
Modélisation de la croissance du conduit vocal. Espace vocalique des nouveau-nés et des adultes. Conséquences pour l’ontogenése et la phylogenése
” [Modelling vocal tract growth: Vowel space for newborns and adults. Consequences for ontogenesis and phylogenesis], Journées d’Études Linguistiques. La Voyelle dans Tous ces États, Nantes, pp.
98
105
.
6.
Boersma
,
P.
, and
Weenink
,
D.
(
2007
). PRAAT, Version 4.4.07, www.praat.org. Last viewed on 12 February 2007.
7.
Campbell
,
M.
(
1999
). “
Articulatory compensation for a biteblock, with and without auditory feedback in hearing and hearing-impaired speakers
,” Doctoral dissertation,
City University of New York
, New York.
9.
Fant
,
G.
(
1983
). “
Feature analysis of Swedish vowels—A revisit
,”
STL-QPSR
2-3
,
1
19
.
10.
Gibson
,
A.
, and
McPhearson
,
L.
(
1980
). “
Production of bite-block vowels by children
,”
Phonetic Exp. Res. Inst. Linguistics Univ. Stockholm
II
,
26
43
.
11.
Goldstein
,
U. G.
(
1980
). “
An articulatory model for the vocal tract of the growing children
,” thesis of Doctor of Science,
MIT, Cambridge
, MA.
13.
Guenther
,
F. H.
,
Hampson
,
M.
, and
Johnson
,
D.
(
1998
). “
A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements
,”
Psychol. Rev.
105
,
611
633
.
14.
Heinz
,
J. M.
, and
Stevens
,
K. N.
(
1965
). “
On the relations between lateral cineradiographs, area functions, and acoustic spectra of speech
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Acoustics
, Liège, September 7–14, p.
A44
.
15.
Hillenbrand
,
J.
,
Getty
,
L. A.
,
Clark
,
M. J.
, and
Wheeler
,
K.
(
1995
). “
Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
3099
3111
.
16.
Hirahara
,
T.
, and
Kato
,
H.
(
1992
). “
The effect of F0 on vowel identification
,” in
Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure
, edited by
Y.
Tokhura
,
E.
Vatikiotis-Bateson
, and
Y.
Sagisaka
, (
Ohmsha/IOS Press
, Tokyo), pp.
89
112
.
17.
Hoemeke
,
K. A.
, and
Diehl
,
R. L.
(
1994
). “
Perception of vowel height: The role of F1F0 distance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
661
674
.
18.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
(
1998
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production
,”
Science
279
,
1213
1216
.
19.
Jones
,
J. A.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2003
). “
Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: The role of auditory feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
532
543
.
20.
Lee
,
S.
,
Potamianos
,
A.
, and
Narayanan
,
S.
(
1999
). “
Acoustics of children’s speech. Developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
1455
1468
.
21.
Maeda
,
S.
(
1989
). “
Compensatory articulation during speech
,” in
Speech Production and Modelling
, edited by
W. J.
Hardcastle
, and
A.
Marchal
, (
Kluwer Academic
, Dordrecht), pp.
131
149
.
22.
Max
,
L.
, and
Onghena
,
P.
(
1999
). “
Some issues in the statistical analysis of completely randomized and repeated measures designs for speech, language, and hearing research
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
42
,
261
270
.
23.
McFarland
,
D. H.
,
Baum
,
S. R.
, and
Chabot
,
C.
(
1996
). “
Speech compensations to structural modifications of the oral cavity
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
1093
1104
.
24.
Ménard
,
L.
,
Schwartz
,
J.-L.
, and
Boë
,
L.-J.
(
2004
). “
Role of vocal tract morphology in speech development: Perceptual targets and sensori-motor maps for synthesized French vowels from birth to adulthood
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
47
,
1059
1080
.
25.
Ménard
,
L.
,
Schwartz
,
J.-L.
,
Boë
,
L.-J.
, and
Aubin
,
J.
(
2007
). “
Production-perception relationships during vocal tract growth for French vowels: Analysis of real data and simulations with an articulatory model
,”
J. Phonetics
35
,
1
19
.
26.
Ménard
,
L.
,
Schwartz
,
J.-L.
,
Boë
,
L.-J.
,
Kandel
,
S.
, and
Vallée
,
N.
(
2002
). “
Auditory normalization of French vowels synthesized by an articulatory model simulating growth from birth to adulthood
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
1892
1905
.
27.
Oller
,
D. K.
, and
MacNeilage
,
P. F.
(
1983
). “
Development of speech production. Perspectives from natural and perturbed speech
,” in
The Production of Speech
, edited by
P. F.
MacNeilage
, (
Springer
, New York), pp.
91
108
.
28.
Perkell
,
J. S.
,
Matthies
,
M. L.
,
Svirsky
,
M. A.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
(
1993
). “
Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: A pilot motor equivalence study
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2948
2961
.
29.
Perrier
,
P.
(
2005
). “
Control and representations in speech production
,”
ZAS Pap. Linguist.
40
,
109
132
.
30.
Potter
,
R. K.
, and
Steinberg
,
J. C.
(
1950
). “
Toward the specification of speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
22
,
807
820
.
31.
Savariaux
,
C.
,
Boë
,
L. J.
, and
Perrier
,
P.
(
1997
). “
How can the control of the vocal tract limit the speaker’s capability to produce the ultimate perceptive objectives of speech?
,”
Proceedings EUROSPEECH’97
, Rhodes, Greece, September 22–25, Vol.
2
, pp.
1063
1066
.
32.
Savariaux
,
C.
,
Perrier
,
P.
, and
Orliaguet
,
J.-P.
(
1995
). “
Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip-tube: A study of the control space in speech production
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
2428
2442
.
33.
Savariaux
,
C.
,
Perrier
,
P.
,
Orliaguet
,
J.-P.
, and
Schwartz
,
J.-L.
(
1999
). “
Compensation strategies for the perturbation of French [u] using a lip tube. II. Perceptual analysis
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
381
393
.
34.
Smith
,
B. L.
, and
McLean-Muse
,
A.
(
1986
). “
Articulatory movement characteristics of labial consonant productions by children and adults
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
1321
1328
.
35.
Syrdal
,
A. K.
, and
Gopal
,
H. S.
(
1986
). “
A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
,
1086
1100
.
36.
Traunmüller
,
H.
(
1981
). “
Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
69
,
1465
1475
.
You do not currently have access to this content.