The occlusion effect is commonly described as an unnatural and mostly annoying quality of the voice of a person wearing hearing aids or hearing protectors. As a result, it is often reported by hearing aid users as a deterrent to wearing hearing aids. This paper presents an investigation into active occlusion cancellation. Measured transducer responses combined with models of an active feedback scheme are first examined in order to predict the effectiveness of occlusion reduction. The simulations predict 18dB of occlusion reduction in completely blocked ear canals. Simulations incorporating a 1mm vent (providing passive occlusion reduction) predict a combined active and passive occlusion reduction of 20dB. A prototype occlusion canceling system was constructed. Averaged across 12 listeners with normal hearing, it provided 15dB of occlusion reduction. Ten of the subjects reported a more natural own voice quality and an appreciable increase in comfort with the cancellation active, and 11 out of the 12 preferred the active system over the passive system.

1.
Benjamin
,
C. K.
(
1982
).
Automatic Control System: Fourth Edition
(
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewoods Cliffs
).
2.
Carle
,
R.
,
Laugesen
,
S.
, and
Nielsen
,
C.
(
2002
). “
Observations on the relations among occlusion effect, compliance, and vent size
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
13
,
25
37
.
3.
Dillon
,
H.
(
2001
).
Hearing Aids
(
Boomerang
,
Sydney
).
4.
Dillon
,
H.
,
Birtles
,
G.
, and
Lovegrove
,
R.
(
1999
). “
Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: Normative data for client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and the hearing aid user’s questionnaire (HAUQ)
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
10
,
67
79
.
5.
Hitay
,
O.
(
1999
).
Introduction to Feedback Control Theory
(
CRC
,
Boca Raton, PL
).
6.
MacKenzie
,
K.
,
Browning
,
G. G.
, and
McClymont
,
L. G.
(
1989
). “
Relationship between earmould venting, comfort and feedback
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
23
,
335
337
.
7.
May
,
A. E.
, and
Dillon
,
H.
(
1992
). “
A comparison of physical measurements of the hearing aid occlusion effect with subjective reports
,” The Australian Journal of Audiology, Supplement 5, May 12.
8.
Mejia
,
J.
,
Dillon
,
H.
, and
Fisher
,
M.
(
2006
). “
Acoustically transparent occlusion reduction system and method
,” WIPO Pub. No. WO/2006/037156 A1, April.
9.
Mueller
,
H. G.
,
Bright
,
K. E.
, and
Northern
,
J. L.
(
1996
). “
Studies of the hearing aid occlusion effect
,”
Semin. Hear.
17
,
21
32
.
10.
Olson
,
H. F.
(
1961
). U.S. Patent No. 2,983,790.
11.
Pirzanski
,
C. Z.
(
1998
). “
Diminishing the occlusion effect: clinician/manufacturer-related factors
.”
Hear. J.
51
,
66
78
.
You do not currently have access to this content.