This is the second of two papers describing the results of acoustical measurements and speech intelligibility tests in elementary school classrooms. The intelligibility tests were performed in 41 classrooms in 12 different schools evenly divided among grades 1, 3, and 6 students (nominally 6, 8, and 11 year olds). Speech intelligibility tests were carried out on classes of students seated at their own desks in their regular classrooms. Mean intelligibility scores were significantly related to signal-to-noise ratios and to the grade of the students. While the results are different than those from some previous laboratory studies that included less realistic conditions, they agree with previous in-classroom experiments. The results indicate that +15dB signal-to-noise ratio is not adequate for the youngest children. By combining the speech intelligibility test results with measurements of speech and noise levels during actual teaching situations, estimates of the fraction of students experiencing near-ideal acoustical conditions were made. The results are used as a basis for estimating ideal acoustical criteria for elementary school classrooms.

1.
American National Standards Institute
, “
Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools
,” ANSI S12.60, New York,
2002
.
2.
K.
Anderson
, “
The problem of classroom acoustics: The typical classroom soundscape is a barrier to learning
,”
Semin. Hear.
25
,
117
129
(
2004
).
3.
S.
Hygge
, “
Classroom experiments on the effects of different noise sources and sound levels on long-term recall and recognition in children
,”
Appl. Cognit. Psychol.
17
,
895
914
(
2003
).
4.
A. L.
Bronzaft
and
D. P.
McCarthy
, “
The effect of elevated train noise on reading ability
,”
Environ. Behav.
7
,
517
528
(
1975
).
5.
A. L.
Bronzaft
, “
The effect of a noise abatement program on reading ability
,”
J. Environ. Psychol.
1
,
215
222
(
1981
).
6.
G. W.
Evans
and
L.
Maxwell
, “
Chronic noise exposure and reading deficits
,”
Environ. Behav.
29
,
638
656
(
1997
).
7.
L. L.
Elliott
,
S.
Connors
,
E.
Kille
,
S.
Levin
,
K.
Bell
, and
D.
Katz
, “
Children’s understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
66
,
12
21
(
1979
).
8.
L. L.
Elliott
, “
Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material—With controlled word predictability
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
66
,
651
653
(
1979
).
9.
A.
Neuman
and
I.
Hochberg
, “
Children’s perception of speech in reverberation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
73
,
2145
2149
(
1983
).
10.
T.
Finitzo-Hieber
and
T. W.
Tillman
, “
Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
21
,
440
458
(
1978
).
11.
N. B.
Marshall
, “
The effects of different signal-to-noise ratios on the speech recognition scores of children
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Alabama
, Tuscaloosa, AL,
1987
.
12.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
846
854
(
1986
).
13.
N. W.
MacKeith
and
R. R. A.
Coles
, “
Binaural advantages in hearing of speech
,”
J. Laryngol. Otol.
85
,
213
232
(
1971
).
14.
A. K.
Nábĕlek
and
P. K.
Robinson
, “
Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
71
,
1242
1248
(
1982
).
15.
A. K.
Nábělek
and
J. M.
Pickett
, “
Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation and hearing aids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
56
,
628
639
(
1974
).
16.
J. P.
Moncur
and
D.
Dirks
, “
Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility in reverberation
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
10
,
186
195
(
1967
).
17.
H.
Sato
and
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in active elementary school classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
123
,
2064
2077
(
2008
).
18.
M.
Ross
and
J.
Lerman
, “
A picture identification test for hearing impaired children
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
13
,
44
53
(
1970
).
19.
M.
Ross
and
J.
Lerman
,
Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification
(
Stanwix House
, Pittsburgh,
1971
).
20.
International Organisation for Standardisation
, “
Acoustics—Measurement of the reverberation time of rooms with reference to other acoustical parameters
,” ISO3382, Geneva, Switzerland.
21.
G. F.
Ferguson
and
Y.
Takane
,
Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education
, 6th ed. (
McGraw Hill
, New York,
1989
).
22.
T.
Houtgast
, “
The effect if ambient noise on speech intelligibility in classrooms
,”
Appl. Acoust.
14
,
15
25
(
1981
).
You do not currently have access to this content.