Budgerigars were trained to produce specific vocalizations (calls) using operant conditioning and food reinforcement. The bird’s call was compared to a digital representation of the call stored in a computer to determine a match. Once birds were responding at a high level of precision, we measured the effect of several manipulations upon the accuracy and the intensity of call production. Also, by differentially reinforcing other aspects of vocal behavior, budgerigars were trained to produce a call that matched another bird’s contact call and to alter the latency of their vocal response. Both the accuracy of vocal matching and the intensity level of vocal production increased significantly when the bird could hear the template immediately before each trial. Moreover, manipulating the delay between the presentation of an acoustic reference and the onset of vocal production did not significantly affect either vocal intensity or matching accuracy. Interestingly, the vocalizations learned and reinforced in these operant experiments were only occasionally used in more natural communicative situations, such as when birds called back and forth to one another in their home cages.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2008
March 01 2008
Vocal learning in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Effects of an acoustic reference on vocal matching
Kazuchika Manabe;
Kazuchika Manabe
a)
Department of Psychology,
University of Maryland
, College Park, Maryland 20742
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert J. Dooling;
Robert J. Dooling
b)
Department of Psychology,
University of Maryland
, College Park, Maryland 20742
Search for other works by this author on:
Elizabeth F. Brittan-Powell
Elizabeth F. Brittan-Powell
Department of Psychology,
University of Maryland
, College Park, Maryland 20742
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 1729–1736 (2008)
Article history
Received:
February 24 2007
Accepted:
December 26 2007
Citation
Kazuchika Manabe, Robert J. Dooling, Elizabeth F. Brittan-Powell; Vocal learning in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Effects of an acoustic reference on vocal matching. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 March 2008; 123 (3): 1729–1736. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2835440
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Vowel signatures in emotional interjections and nonlinguistic vocalizations expressing pain, disgust, and joy across languages
Maïa Ponsonnet, Christophe Coupé, et al.
The alveolar trill is perceived as jagged/rough by speakers of different languages
Aleksandra Ćwiek, Rémi Anselme, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Learned vocalizations in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): The relationship between contact calls and warble song
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2011)
Perception of synthetic /ba/–/wa/ speech continuum by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)
J Acoust Soc Am (September 1997)
Auditory brainstem responses in adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)
J Acoust Soc Am (September 2002)
Perception of budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) warble elements
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2006)
Effects of deafening on the calls and warble song of adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus)
J Acoust Soc Am (March 1999)