People increase their vocal output in noisy environments. This is known as the Lombard effect. The aim of the present study was to measure the effect as a function of the absorption coefficient. The noise source was generated by using other talkers in the room. A-weighted sound levels were measured in a 108m3 test room. The number of talkers varied from one to four and the absorption coefficients from 0.12 to 0.64. A model was introduced based on the logarithmic sum of the level found in an anechoic room plus the increasing portion of noise levels up to 80dB. Results show that the model fits the measurements when a maximum slope of 0.5dB per 1.0dB increase in background level is used. Hence Lombard slopes vary from 0.2dBdB at 50dB background level to 0.5dBdB at 80dB. In addition, both measurements and the model predict a decrease of 5.5dB per doubling of absorbing area in a room when the number of talkers is constant. Sound pressure levels increase for a doubling of talkers from 3dB for low densities to 6dB for dense crowds. Finally, there was correspondence between the model estimation and previous measurements reported in the literature.

1.
E.
Lombard
, “
Le signe de l’élévation de la voix [Characteristics of the elevation of the voice]
,”
Annales des Maladies de l’Oreille et du Larynx
37
,
101
119
(
1911
).
2.
H.
Lane
and
B.
Tranel
, “
The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
14
,
667
709
(
1971
).
3.
M. B.
Gardner
, “
Factors affecting individual and group levels in verbal communication
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
19
,
560
569
(
1971
).
4.
K.
Pearsons
,
R. L.
Bennett
, and
S.
Fidell
, “
Speech levels in various environments
,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/1–77–025, Washington D.C.,
1977
.
5.
W. O.
Olsen
, “
Average speech levels and spectra in various speaking/listening conditions, a summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) Report
,”
American Journal of Audiology
7
,
21
25
(
1998
).
6.
M.
Hodgson
,
G.
Steininger
, and
Z.
Razavi
, “
Measurement and prediction of speech and noise levels and the Lombard effect in eating establishments
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
121
,
2023
2033
(
2007
).
7.
M.
Oberdörster
and
G.
Tiesler
, “
Acoustic ergonomics in schools
,” Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Dortmund, Germany,
2006
.
8.
M. R.
Hodgson
,
R.
Rempel
, and
S. M.
Kennedy
, “
Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background-noise levels in university classrooms during lectures
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
226
233
(
1999
).
9.
M. R.
Hodgson
, “
Case-study evaluations of the acoustical designs of renovated classrooms
,”
Appl. Acoust.
65
,
69
89
(
2004
).
10.
M. E.
Valk
,
P. H.
Heringa
, and
L.
Nijs
, “
Het optimaliseren van de ruimteakoestiek voor de les- en oefenruimtes van het Conservatorium van Amsterdam
,” [Optimizing the room acoustics for the study and teaching rooms in the Conservatory of Amsterdam],
Bouwfysica
17
,
11
15
(
2006
).
11.
L.
Nijs
,
P.
Versteeg
, and
M.
van der Voorden
, “
The combination of absorbing materials and room shapes to reduce noise levels
,” 18th International Congress on Acoustics, Kyoto,
2004
.
12.
A. D.
Pierce
,
Acoustics
(
Acoustical Society of America
,
New York
,
1985
).
13.
J.
van der Werff
,
Speech Intelligibility, the ALcons Method Based on the Work of Victor Peutz
(
Zoetermeer
,
Peutz
,
2004
).
14.
E.
van Heusden
,
R.
Plomp
, and
L. C. W.
Pols
, “
Effect of ambient noise on the vocal output nd the preferred listening level of conversational speech
,”
Appl. Acoust.
12
,
31
43
(
1979
).
15.
L.
Nijs
, “
The distribution of absorption materials in a rectangular room
,” Internoise Congress on Noise Control Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,
2005
.
16.
T.
Houtgast
and
H. J. M.
Steeneken
, “
A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
,
1069
1077
(
1985
).
17.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
846
854
(
1986
).
18.
J. S.
Bradley
and
S. R.
Bistafa
, “
Relating speech intelligibility to useful-to-detrimental sound ratios
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
27
29
(
2002
). This article refers to and corrects three earlier publications.
19.
E. Ph. J.
de Ruiter
,
The Great Canyon, Reclaiming Land from Urban Traffic Impact Zones
(
Zoetermeer
,
Peutz
,
2004
).
20.
W. T.
Chu
and
A. C. C.
Warnock
, “
Detailed directivity of sound fields around human talkers
,” National Research Council Canada, IRC-RR-104,
2002
.
21.
M.
Barron
,
Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design
(
E&FN Spon
,
London
,
1993
).
You do not currently have access to this content.