This study evaluated road traffic noise annoyance in Canada in relation to activity interference, subject concerns about noise and self-reported distance to a major road. Random digit dialing was employed to survey a representative sample of 2565 Canadians 15years of age and older. Respondents highly annoyed by traffic noise were significantly more likely to perceive annoyance to negatively impact health, live closer to a heavily traveled road and report that traffic noise often interfered with daily activities. Sex, age, education level, community size and province had statistically significant associations with traffic noise annoyance. High noise annoyance consistently correlated with frequent interference of activities. Reducing noise at night (10pm7am) was more important than during the rest of the day.

2.
BRE Environment
(
2002
). “
The 1999/2000 national survey of attitudes to environmental noise—Volume 3 United Kingdom results
,” Report No. 205217f.
3.
Broadbent
,
D. E.
(
1972
). “
Individual differences in annoyance by noise
,”
Sound
6
,
56
61
.
4.
Commission of the European Communities
. (
1996
). “
Future Noise Policy
,” Brussels,
1
31
.
5.
Council for Marketing and Opinion Research
(CMOR) (
2002
). “
Tracking System—Cooperation, Refusal and Response Rates
,” Available at: http://www.cmor.org/rc/studies.cfm (last viewed on 08/30/2007).
7.
Eldred
,
K. M.
(
1990
). “
Noise at the year 2000
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem
, edited by
B.
Berglund
 et al.,
Stockholm, Sweden
.
Swedish Council for Building Research
,
355
381
.
8.
Fidell
,
S.
,
Schultz
,
T.
, and
Green
,
D. M.
(
1988
). “
A theoretical interpretation of the prevalence rate of noise-induced annoyance in residential populations
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
,
2109
2113
.
9.
Fields
,
J. M.
(
1993
). “
Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2753
2763
.
10.
Fields
,
J. M.
,
Ehrlich
,
G. E.
, and
Zador
,
P.
(
2000
). “
Theory and design tools for studies of reactions to abrupt changes in noise exposure
,” NASA/CR-2000-210280.
11.
Fields
,
J. M.
, and
Hall
,
F. L.
(
1987
). “
Community effects of noise
,” in
The Effects of Transportation Noise on Man
, edited by
P. M.
Nelson
London: (
Butterworths
,
London
), pp.
1
27
.
12.
Guski
,
R.
(
1999
). “
Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance
,”
Noise Health
1
,
45
56
.
13.
ISO
. (
2002
). “
Acoustics-assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys
,” ISO/TS 15666:2002
14.
ISO
. (
2003
). “
Acoustics-description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise-Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures
,” ISO 1996-1:2003(E).
15.
Lambert
,
J.
, and
Vallet
,
M.
(
1994
). “
Study related to the preparation of a communication on a future EC noise policy
,” Report No. 9420:1-143.
16.
Maschke
,
C.
, and
Niemann
,
H.
(
2005
). “
Health effects of neighborhood noise-induced annoyance
,”
Proceedings of Inter-Noise
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
.
17.
Michaud
,
D. S.
,
Keith
,
S. E.
, and
McMurchy
,
D.
(
2005
). “
Noise annoyance in Canada
,”
Noise Health
7
,
39
47
.
18.
Miedema
,
H. M.
, and
Oudshoorn
,
C. G.
(
2001
). “
Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals
,”
Environ. Health Perspect.
109
,
409
416
.
19.
Niemann
,
H.
, and
Maschke
,
C.
(
2004
). “
Noise effects and morbidity-WHO LARES Final report
,” available at http://www.euro.who.int/Document/HOH/LARES̱results.pdf (accessed on 08/21/2006).
20.
O’Rourke
,
D.
,
Chapa-Resendez
,
G.
,
Hamilton
,
L.
,
Lind
,
K.
,
Owens
,
L.
, and
Parker
,
V.
(
1998
). “
An inquiry into declining RDD response rates. Part 1: Telephone survey practices
,”
Survey Res.
29
,
1
14
.
21.
OECD
. (
1986
). “
Fighting noise: Strengthening noise abatement policies
,” Renouf Pub. Co. Ltd., France.
22.
OECD
. (
1991
). “
Fighting noise in the nineteen nineties
,” OECD & Devel, France.
23.
PWGSC
. (
2007
). “
Best practices in public opinion research: Improving respondent cooperation for telephone surveys
,”
Public Works Government Services Canada
, Ottawa, Canada, Catalogue Number: P103-2/2007E-PDF.
24.
Schultz
,
T.
(
1978
). “
Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
,
377
405
.
25.
Statistics Canada
(
2004
). “
Annual Demographic Statistics (2004)
,” Cataloge No. 91-213-XIB.
27.
Troldahl
,
V. C.
, and
Carter
,
R. E.
(
1964
). “
Random selection of respondents with households in phone surveys
,”
J. Marketing Surveys
1
,
71
76
.
28.
U.S. EPA
. (
1974
). “
Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety
,” Report No. 550/9-74-004:1-G15.
29.
Waksberg
,
J.
(
1978
). “
Sampling methods for random digit dialing
,”
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
73
,
40
46
.
31.
WHO
. (
1999
). “
Guidelines for Community Noise
,” edited by
B.
Berglund
,
T.
Lindvall
, and
D. H.
Schwela
,
World Health Organization
, Geneva. http://www.who.int/docstore/peh/noise/guidelines2.html (accessed on (02/26/2007).
You do not currently have access to this content.