While at school children are exposed to various types of noise including external, environmental noise and noise generated within the classroom. Previous research has shown that noise has detrimental effects upon children’s performance at school, including reduced memory, motivation, and reading ability. In England and Wales, children’s academic performance is assessed using standardized tests of literacy, mathematics, and science. A study has been conducted to examine the impact, if any, of chronic exposure to external and internal noise on the test results of children aged 7 and 11 in London (UK) primary schools. External noise was found to have a significant negative impact upon performance, the effect being greater for the older children. The analysis suggested that children are particularly affected by the noise of individual external events. Test scores were also affected by internal classroom noise, background levels being significantly related to test results. Negative relationships between performance and noise levels were maintained when the data were corrected for socio-economic factors relating to social deprivation, language, and special educational needs. Linear regression analysis has been used to estimate the maximum levels of external and internal noise which allow the schools surveyed to achieve required standards of literacy and numeracy.

1.
B.
Shield
and
J. E.
Dockrell
, “
External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
730
738
(
2004
).
2.
E.
Celik
and
Z.
Karabiber
, “
A pilot study on the ratio of schools and students affected from noise
,”
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Noise Control and Acoustics for Educational Buildings
, Turkish Acoustical Society,
Istanbul
, May
2000
, pp.
119
128
.
3.
M.
Hodgson
,
R.
Rempel
, and
S.
Kennedy
, “
Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background noise levels in university classrooms during lectures
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
226
233
(
1999
).
4.
M.
Picard
and
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Revisiting speech interference in classrooms
,”
Audiology
40
,
221
224
(
2001
).
5.
A.
Moodley
, “
Acoustic conditions in mainstream classrooms
,”
J. British Association of Teachers of the Deaf
13
,
48
54
(
1989
).
6.
B.
Hay
, “
A pilot study of classroom noise levels and teachers’ reactions
,”
J. Voice
4
,
127
134
(
1995
).
7.
D.
MacKenzie
, “
Noise sources and levels in UK schools
,”
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Noise Control and Acoustics for Educational Buildings
, Turkish Acoustical Society,
Istanbul
, May
2000
, pp.
97
106
.
8.
B.
Berglund
and
T.
Lindvall
, “
Community Noise
,”
Archives of the Center for Sensory Research
, Stockholm University and Karolinska Institute,
2
,
1
195
(
1995
).
9.
Institute for Environment and Health
, “
The non-auditory effects of noise
,” Report No. R10,
1997
.
10.
R.
Hetu
,
C.
Truchon-Gagnon
, and
S. A.
Bilodeau
, “
Problems of noise in school settings: A review of literature and the results of an exploratory study
,”
J. Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology
14
,
31
38
(
1990
).
11.
G. W.
Evans
and
S. J.
Lepore
, “
Nonauditory effects of noise on children: A critical review
,”
Children’s Environments
10
,
31
51
(
1993
).
12.
S.
Cohen
,
G. W.
Evans
,
D. S.
Krantz
, and
D.
Stokols
, “
Physiological, motivational, and cognitive effects of aircraft noise on children. Moving from the laboratory to the field
,”
Am. Psychol.
35
,
231
243
(
1980
).
13.
S.
Hygge
,
G. W.
Evans
, and
M.
Bullinger
, “
The Munich Airport noise study: Cognitive effects on children from before to after the change over of airports
,”
Proceedings Inter-Noise’96
,
Liverpool, UK
, pp.
2189
2192
.
14.
M. M.
Haines
,
S. A.
Stansfeld
,
J.
Head
, and
R. F. S.
Job
, “
Multi-level modelling of aircraft noise on performance tests in schools around Heathrow Airport London
,”
J. Epidemiol. Community Health
56
,
139
144
(
2002
).
15.
C.
Clark
,
R.
Martin
,
E.
van Kempen
,
T.
Alfred
,
J.
Head
,
H. W.
Davies
,
M. M.
Haines
,
B.
Lopez
,
M.
Matheson
, and
S.
Stansfeld
, “
Exposure-effect relations between aircraft and road traffic noise exposure at school and reading comprehension: The RANCH project
,”
Am. J. Epidemiol.
163
,
27
37
(
2006
).
16.
S.
Cohen
,
G. W.
Evans
,
D. S.
Krantz
,
D.
Stokols
, and
S.
Kelly
, “
Aircraft noise and children: Longitudinal and cross-sectional evidence on adaptation to noise and the effectiveness of noise abatement
,”
J. Pers Soc. Psychol.
40
,
331
345
(
1981
).
17.
A. L.
Bronzaft
and
D. P.
McCarthy
, “
The effect of elevated train noise on reading ability
,”
Environ. Behav.
7
,
517
527
(
1975
).
18.
A. L.
Bronzaft
, “
The effect of a noise abatement program on reading ability
,”
J. Environ. Psychol.
1
,
215
222
(
1981
).
19.
J. S.
Lukas
,
R. B.
DuPree
, and
J. W.
Swing
, “
Report of a study on the effects of freeway noise on academic achievement of elementary school children, and a recommendation for a criterion level for a school noise abatement program
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.
20
,
1396
1408
(
1981
).
20.
S.
Sanz
,
A. M.
Garcia
, and
A.
Garcia
, “
Road traffic noise around schools: A risk for pupils’ performance?
,”
Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health
65
,
205
207
(
1993
).
21.
J.
Romero
and
D.
Lliso
, “
Perception and acoustic conditions in secondary Spanish schools
,”
Proceedings of the 15ᵗʰ International Congress on Acoustics
,
Trondheim, Norway
,
1995
, pp.
271
274
.
22.
F.
Berg
,
J.
Blair
, and
P.
Benson
, “
Classroom acoustics: The problem, impact and solution
,”
Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
27
,
16
20
(
1996
).
23.
S.
Airey
and
D.
Mackenzie
, “
Speech intelligibility in classrooms
,”
Proc. Institute of Acoustics
21
,
75
79
(
1999
).
24.
L.
Maxwell
and
G.
Evans
, “
The effects of noise on pre-school children’s pre-reading skills
,”
J. Environ. Psychol.
20
,
91
97
(
2000
).
25.
P.
Lundquist
,
K.
Holmberg
, and
U.
Landstrom
, “
Annoyance and effects on work from environmental noise at school
,”
Noise Health
2
,
39
46
(
2000
).
26.
World Health Organisation
,
Guidelines for Community Noise
(Geneva,
1999
).
27.
American National Standards Institute
, “
ANSI S12.60-2002: Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools
,” New York,
2002
.
28.
Department for Education and Skills
, “
Building Bulletin 93: Acoustic design of schools
,” The Stationery Office, London,
2003
.
29.
J. E.
Dockrell
and
B. M.
Shield
, “
Acoustical barriers in classrooms: The impact of noise on performance in the classroom
,”
British Educational Research Journal
32
,
509
525
(
2006
).
30.
W.
Williamson
and
D. D.
Byrne
, “
Educational disadvantage in an urban setting
,” in
Social Problems and the City
, edited by
D. T.
Herbert
and
D. M.
Smith
(
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford
,
1977
).
31.
P.
Sammons
,
A.
West
, and
A.
Hind
, “
Accounting for variations in pupil attainment at the end of Key Stage 1
,”
British Educational Research Journal
23
,
489
511
(
1997
).
32.
J. E.
Dockrell
and
B. M.
Shield
, “
Children’s perceptions of their acoustic environment at school and at home
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
2964
2973
(
2004
).
You do not currently have access to this content.