It is shown in this paper that the conventional triangulation technique is not very reliable for locating the impact point even in isotropic plates when the sensors are placed close to the point of strike for two reasons: First, it is difficult to pinpoint the exact time of arrival of the signal and, second, the Lamb modes in a plate are dispersive. Dispersive signals attenuate differently at various frequencies and propagate with different speeds causing distortions in the received signals, and thus introduce error in the time of flight measurement. The triangulation technique assumes that wave speeds in all directions are the same, which is not true for anisotropic plates. Here an alternative approach based on an optimization scheme is proposed to locate the point of impact in isotropic and anisotropic plates. A formulation is presented for the general anisotropic case. Experiments are carried out with an aluminum plate by dropping balls on the plate and picking up acoustic signals at different locations. The impact points predicted by the conventional triangulation technique and the proposed modified method are compared for this isotropic plate. Then it is investigated how the prediction would change if the plate is assumed to have some anisotropy.

1.
K. V.
Jata
,
T.
Kundu
, and
T.
Parthasarathy
, “
An introduction to failure mechanisms and ultrasonic inspection
,” in
Advanced Ultrasonic Methods for Material and Structure Inspection
, edited by
T.
Kundu
(
ISTE
, London,
2007
), Chap. 1, pp.
1
42
.
2.
V.
Giurgiutiu
, “
Lamb wave generation with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring
,”
Proc. SPIE
5056
,
111
122
(
2003
).
3.
A. K.
Mal
,
F.
Shih
, and
S.
Banerjee
, “
Acoustic emission waveforms in composite laminates under low velocity impact
,”
Proc. SPIE
5047
,
1
12
(
2003
).
4.
A. K.
Mal
,
F.
Ricci
,
S.
Gibson
, and
S.
Banerjee
, “
Damage detection in structures from vibration and wave propagation data
,”
Proc. SPIE
5047
,
202
210
(
2003
).
5.
B.
Köhler
,
F.
Schubert
, and
B.
Frankenstein
, “
Numerical and experimental investigation of Lamb wave excitation, propagation and detection for SHM
,”
Proceedings of the Second European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring
, Munich, Germany,
2004
, pp.
993
1000
.
6.
J.
Park
and
F. K.
Chang
, “
Built-in detection of impact damage in multi-layered thick composite structures
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring
, Stanford Univ., CA, USA,
2003
, pp.
1391
1398
.
7.
A. K.
Mal
,
F.
Ricci
,
S.
Banerjee
, and
F.
Shih
, “
A conceptual structural health monitoring system based on wave propagation and modal data
,”
Struct. Health Monit.
4
,
283
293
(
2005
).
8.
G.
Manson
,
K.
Worden
, and
D. J.
Allman
, “
Experimental validation of structural health monitoring methodology. II. Novelty detection on an aircraft wing
,”
J. Sound Vib.
259
,
345
363
(
2003
).
9.
S. C.
Wang
and
F.-K.
Chang
, “
Diagnosis of impact damage in composite structures with built-in piezoelectrics network
,”
Proc. SPIE
3990
,
13
19
(
2000
).
10.
S. S.
Kessler
,
S. M.
Spearing
, and
C.
Soutis
, “
Damage detection in composite materials using Lamb wave methods
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
12
,
795
803
(
2002
).
11.
T.
Kundu
,
S.
Das
, and
K. V.
Jata
, “
An improved technique for locating the point of impact from the acoustic emission data
,”
Proc. SPIE
6532
,
1
12
(
2007
).
12.
P. T.
Coverley
and
W. J.
Staszewski
, “
Impact damage location in composite structures using optimized sensor triangulation procedure
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
12
,
795
803
(
2003
).
13.
F. L.
Di Scalea
,
H.
Matt
,
I.
Bartoli
,
A.
Srivastava
,
G.
Park
, and
C.
Farrar
, “
The fundamental response of piezoelectric guided-wave sensors and applications to damage and impact location
,”
Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Structural Health Monitoring
, Granada, Spain,
2006
, pp.
1271
1278
.
14.
J. A.
Nelder
and
R.
Mead
, “
A simplex method for function minimization
,”
Comput. J.
7
,
308
315
(
1965
).
You do not currently have access to this content.