A novel approach for disrupting offensive chants at sporting events is proposed, based on attacking synchronization between individuals. Since timing is crucial for coordination between chanters, disruption of timing is expected to be effective against undesired chants. Delayed auditory feedback is known to disrupt timing in individual sound production. It may be expected to have similar effects on groups of chanters. To test this hypothesis, a controlled laboratory study was carried out. This showed that the timing of individuals joining in with sports chants can indeed be severely disrupted by also presenting an artificially delayed version of this chant (distracter). This effect is reduced as an individual is given more cues (direction, fidelity) to differentiate between original chant and distracter. However, informal field trials showed that it may be hard to exploit the perceptual effects discussed here for countering offending sports chants in a real-life setting, particularly due to feedback distortion at the required high levels.

1.
Armstrong
,
G.
, and
Young
,
M.
(
1999
). “
Fanatical football chants: Creating and controlling the carnival
.” Sport in Society
2
(
3
),
173
211
.
2.
Bromberger
,
C.
(
1993
). “
Fireworks and the ass
,” in
The Passion and Fashion: Football Fandom in the New Europe
, edited by
S.
Redhead
(
Aldershot
).
3.
Chafe
,
C.
,
Gurevich
,
M.
,
Leslie
,
G.
, and
Tyan
,
S.
(
2004
). “
Effect of time delay on ensemble accuracy
,”
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Musical Acoustics (ISMA2004)
, Nara, Japan.
4.
Jungers
,
M. K.
,
Palmer
,
C.
, and
Speer
,
S. R.
(
2002
). “
Time after time: The coordinating influence of tempo in music and speech
,” Cognitive Processing
1-2
,
21
35
.
5.
Kuniszyk-Jözkowiak
W.
(
1996
). “
A comparison of speech envelopes of stutterers and non-stutterers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
(
2
),
1105
1110
.
6.
Lee
,
B. S.
(
1950
). “
Effects of delayed speech feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
22
(
6
),
824
826
.
7.
McRobb Calder
,
R.
(
2002
). “
Method of crowd control
,” UK Patent application GB 2 368 958 A.
8.
Néda
,
Z.
,
Ravasz
,
A.
,
Brechet
,
Y.
,
Vicsek
,
T.
, and
Barabási
,
A-L.
(
2000
). “
Self-organizing processes: The sound of many hands clapping
,”
Nature (London)
,
403
,
849
850
.
9.
Pfordresher
,
P. Q.
, and
Palmer
,
C.
(
2002
). “
Effects of delayed auditory feedback on timing of music performance
,”
Psychol. Res.
16
,
71
79
.
10.
Tye-Marray
,
N.
(
1992
). “
Young cochlear implant users’ response to delayed auditory feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
(
6
),
3483
3486
.
12.
Van Wijngaarden
,
S. J.
, and
Van Leeuwen
,
D. A.
(
2006
). “
Method and means for counteracting undesired sound utterances of a group
,” International Patent Application PCT/NL2005/000668.
11.
Van Wijngaarden
,
S. J.
, and
Van Balken
,
J. S.
(
2006
). “
Suppression of sports chants through delayed feedback of sound
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
,
3332
.
13.
Yates
,
A. J.
(
1963
). “
Delayed auditory feedback
,”
Psychol. Bull.
60
(
3
),
213
232
.
You do not currently have access to this content.