The heterogeneous nucleation of gas bubbles from cavities in a surface in contact with a liquid is a widely recognized phenomenon. This process has previously been theoretically analyzed extensively for a conical crevice, although in practice a wide range of cavity geometries might be expected. The method of analysis originally presented by Atchley and Prosperetti [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 1065–1084 (1989)] for the unstable growth of a gas-liquid interface in a conical crevice is here extended to any axisymmetric cavity geometry and four such different geometries are analyzed. Although the method presented neglects gas transfer, and therefore is most directly suitable for acoustic cavitations, this method is still valuable in comparing the nucleation behavior of different cavity types. It is found that once the interface has emerged outside the cavity, its behavior is determined by the size of the cavity’s opening. Given that the behavior of the interface once it is outside the cavity will also be determined by the local flow conditions, the threshold for unstable growth of the interface inside the cavity leading to its emergence is the important value and will determine differences between cavity geometries in practice, as shown in the examples presented.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2007
February 01 2007
The effect of cavity geometry on the nucleation of bubbles from cavities
Michael A. Chappell;
Michael A. Chappell
a)
Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford
, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PJ, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephen J. Payne
Stephen J. Payne
Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford
, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PJ, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 853–862 (2007)
Article history
Received:
February 06 2006
Accepted:
November 08 2006
Citation
Michael A. Chappell, Stephen J. Payne; The effect of cavity geometry on the nucleation of bubbles from cavities. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 February 2007; 121 (2): 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2404629
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Nucleation of acoustic cavitation from a gas‐filled crevice
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Diffusion-driven periodic cavitation bubbling from a Harvey-type crevice in shear flows
Physics of Fluids (October 2023)
Tunable microfluidic standing air bubbles and its application in acoustic microstreaming
Biomicrofluidics (June 2019)
The effect of static pressure on the inertial cavitation threshold
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2012)
The induction of inertial cavitation from polymeric nanocups—From theory to observation
J Acoust Soc Am (March 2018)