Originally developed to estimate the power gain of the cochlear amplifier, so-called “Allen–Fahey” and related experiments have proved invaluable for probing the mechanisms of wave generation and propagation within the cochlea. The experimental protocol requires simultaneous measurement of intracochlear distortion products (DPs) and ear-canal otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) under tightly controlled conditions. To calibrate the intracochlear response to the DP, Allen–Fahey experiments traditionally employ invasive procedures such as recording from auditory-nerve fibers or measuring basilar-membrane velocity. This paper describes an alternative method that allows the intracochlear distortion source to be calibrated noninvasively. In addition to the standard pair of primary tones used to generate the principal DP, the noninvasive method employs a third, fixed tone to create a secondary DPOAE whose amplitude and phase provide a sensitive assay of the intracochlear value of the principal DP near its characteristic place. The method is used to perform noninvasive Allen–Fahey experiments in cat and shown to yield results in quantitative agreement with the original, auditory-nerve-based paradigm performed in the same animal. Data obtained using a suppression-compensated variation of the noninvasive method demonstrate that neither traveling-wave amplification nor two-tone suppression constitutes the controlling influence in DPOAE generation at close frequency ratios. Rather, the dominant factor governing the emission magnitude appears to be the variable directionality of the waves radiated by the distortion-source region, which acts as a distortion beamformer tuned by the primary frequency ratio.
REFERENCES
1.
Allen
, J. B.
, and Fahey
, P. F.
(1992
). “Using acoustic distortion products to measure the cochlear amplifier gain on the basilar membrane
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
, 178
–188
.2.
Allen
, J. B.
, and Fahey
, P. F.
(1993
). “A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
, 809
–816
.3.
Brown
, A. M.
, Gaskill
, S. A.
, and Williams
, D. M.
(1992
). “Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear
,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B
250
, 29
–34
.4.
Cody
, A. R.
(1992
). “Acoustic lesions in the mammalian cochlea: Implications for the spatial distribution of the ‘active proces’
,” Hear. Res.
62
, 166
–172
.5.
de Boer
, E.
(1995
). “The ‘inverse problem’ solved for a three-dimensional model of the cochlea. II. Application to experimental data sets
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
, 904
–910
.6.
de Boer
, E.
, and Nuttall
, A. L.
(2001
). “Power gain of the cochlear amplifier
,” in Physiological and Psychological Bases of Auditory Function
, edited by D. J.
Breebaart
, A. J. M.
Houtsma
, A.
Kohlrausch
, V. F.
Prijs
, and R.
Schoonhoven
(Shaker
, Maastricht), pp. 1
–7
.7.
de Boer
, E.
, Nuttall
, A. L.
, Hu
, N.
, Zou
, Y.
, and Zheng
, J.
(2005
). “The Allen–Fahey experiment extended
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
, 1260
–1266
.8.
Dong
, W.
, and Olson
, E. S.
(2005
). “Two-tone distortion in intracochlear pressure
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
, 2999
–3015
.9.
Evans
, E. F.
(1975
). “Cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus
,” in Handbook of Sensory Physiology
, edited by W. D.
Keidel
and W. D.
Neff
(Springer
, Berlin), Vol. V/2
, pp. 1
–108
.10.
Fahey
, P. F.
, and Allen
, J. B.
(1985
). “Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
, 599
–612
.11.
Fahey
, P. F.
, Stagner
, B. B.
, Lonsbury-Martin
, B. L.
, and Martin
, G. K.
(2000
). “Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
, 1786
–1802
.12.
Fahey
, P. F.
, Stagner
, B. B.
, and Martin
, G. K.
(2006
). “Mechanism for bandpass frequency characteristic in distortion product otoacoustic emission generation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
, 991
–996
.13.
Goldstein
, J. L.
, Buschsbaum
, G.
, and Furst
, M.
(1978
). “Compatibility between psychophysical and physiological measurements of aural combination tones
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
, 474
–485
.14.
Goldstein
, J. L.
, and Kiang
, N. Y. S.
(1968
). “Neural correlates of the aural combination tone
,” Proc. IEEE
56
, 981
–991
.15.
Guinan
, J. J.
, and Gifford
, M. L.
(1988
). “Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. I. Rate versus sound level functions
,” Hear. Res.
33
, 97
–114
.16.
Guinan
, J. J.
, and Stanković
, K. M.
(1996
). “Medial efferent inhibition produces the largest equivalent attenuations at moderate to high sound levels in cat auditory-nerve fibers
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
, 1680
–1690
.17.
Kalluri
, R.
, and Shera
, C. A.
(2001
). “Distortion-product source unmixing: A test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
, 622
–637
.18.
Kanis
, L. J.
, and de Boer
, E.
(1993
). “The emperor’s new clothes: DP emissions in a locally-active nonlinear model of the cochlea
,” in Biophysics of Hair Cell Sensory Systems
, edited by H.
Duifhuis
, J. W.
Horst
, P.
van Dijk
, and S. M.
van Netten
(World Scientific
, Singapore), pp. 304
–314
.19.
Kanis
, L. J.
, and de Boer
, E.
(1997
). “Frequency dependence of acoustic distortion products in a locally active model of the cochlea
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 1527
–1531
.20.
Kemp
, D. T.
, and Knight
, R.
(1999
). “Virtual DP reflector explains DPOAE ‘wave’ and ‘place’ fixed dichotomy
,” Assoc. Res Otolaryngol. Abs.
22
, 396
.21.
Knight
, R. D.
, and Kemp
, D. T.
(2000
). “Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed area study
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
, 457
–473
.22.
Liberman
, M. C.
(1978
). “Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
, 442
–455
.23.
Liberman
, M. C.
(1982
). “The cochlear frequency map for the cat: Labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
, 1441
–1449
.24.
Press
, W. H.
, Teukolsky
, S. A.
, Vetterling
, W. T.
, and Flannery
, B. P.
(1992
). Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing
(Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge).25.
Ren
, T.
, and Nuttall
, A. L.
(2006
). “Cochlear compression wave: An implication of the Allen–Fahey experiment
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
119
, 1940
–1942
.26.
Schroeder
, M. R.
(1975
). “Amplitude behavior of the cubic difference tone
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
58
, 728
–732
.27.
Shera
, C. A.
(2003
). “Wave interference in the generation of reflection- and distortion-source emissions
,” in Biophysics of the Cochlea: From Molecules to Models
, edited by A. W.
Gummer
(World Scientific
, Singapore), pp. 439
–453
.28.
Shera
, C. A.
, and Guinan
, J. J.
(1997
). “Measuring cochlear amplification and nonlinearity using distortion-product otoacoustic emissions as a calibrated intracochlear sound source
,” Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. Abs.
20
, 51
.29.
Shera
, C. A.
, and Guinan
, J. J.
(1999
). “Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEs
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
, 782
–798
.30.
Shera
, C. A.
, and Guinan
, J. J.
(2007
). “Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission
,” in Active Processes and Otoacoustic Emissions, edited by G. A.
Manley
, B. L.
Lonsbury-Martin
, A. N.
Popper
, and R. R.
Fay
, in press (Springer
, New York).31.
Shera
, C. A.
, Tubis
, A.
, and Talmadge
, C. L.
(2005
). “Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
, 287
–313
.32.
Shera
, C. A.
, Tubis
, A.
, Talmadge
, C. L.
, de Boer
, E.
, Fahey
, P. F.
, and Guinan
, J. J.
(2007
). “Allen–Fahey and related experiments support the predominance of cochlear slow-wave otoacoustic emissions
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
(in press).33.
Shera
, C. A.
, and Zweig
, G.
(1992
). “Analyzing reverse middle-ear transmission: Noninvasive Gedankenexperiments
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
, 1371
–1381
.34.
Talmadge
, C. L.
, Tubis
, A.
, Long
, G. R.
, and Piskorski
, P.
(1998
). “Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structure
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
, 1517
–1543
.35.
van der Heijden
, M.
, and Joris
, P. X.
(2003
). “Cochlear phase and amplitude retrieved from the auditory nerve at arbitrary frequencies
,” J. Neurosci.
23
, 9194
–9198
.36.
van Hengel
, P. W. J.
(1996
). “Emissions from cochlear modelling
,” Ph.D. thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
.37.
Ver
, I. L.
, Brown
, R. M.
, and Kiang
, N. Y. S.
(1975
). “Low-noise chambers for auditory research
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
58
, 392
–398
.38.
Whitehead
, M. L.
, Lonsbury-Martin
, B. L.
, and Martin
, G. K.
(1993
). “Measurement of excitation at the distortion-frequency place in the cochlea using ear-canal distortion products
,” Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. Abs.
16
, 395
.39.
Zweig
, G.
(1976
). “Basilar membrane motion
,” in Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
(Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
, Cold Spring Harbor, NY), Vol. XL
, pp. 619
–633
.40.
Zweig
, G.
(1991
). “Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
, 1229
–1254
.© 2007 Acoustical Society of America.
2007
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.