A study of community annoyance caused by exposures to railway noise was carried out in 18 areas along railway lines to accumulate social survey data and assess the relationship between railway noise levels and annoyance responses in Korea. Railway noise levels were measured with portable sound-level meters. Social surveys were administered to people living within 50m of noise measurement sites. A questionnaire contained demographic factors, degree of noise annoyance, interference with daily activities, and health-related symptoms. The question relating to noise annoyance was answered on an 11-point numerical scale. The randomly selected respondents, who were aged between 18 to 70 years of age, completed the questionnaire independently. In total, 726 respondents participated in social surveys. Taking into consideration the urban structure and layout of the residential areas of Korea, Japan, and Europe, one can assume that the annoyance responses caused by the railway noise in this study will be similar to those found in Japan, which are considerably more severe than those found in European countries. This study showed that one of the most important factors contributing to the difference in the annoyance responses between Korea and Europe is the distance between railways and houses.

1.
WHO, Guidelines for Community Noise, World Health Organization (
2000
), Geneva, Switzerland.
2.
R.
Guski
and
U.
Felscher-Suhr
, “
The concept of noise annoyance: How international experts see it
,”
J. Sound Vib.
223
,
513
527
(
1999
).
3.
H. S.
Koelega
, “
Environmental Annoyance: Characterization, Measurement and Control
” (
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
,
1987
).
4.
R.
Guski
, “
Conceptual, methodological and dose-response problems related to annoyance and disturbance
,”
Inter-Noise
97
,
1077
1082
(
1997
).
5.
J. M.
Fields
, “
Effects of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2753
2763
(
1993
).
6.
H. M. E.
Miedema
and
H.
Vos
, “
Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
3336
3344
(
1999
).
7.
T. H. J.
Schultz
, “
Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
,
377
405
(
1978
).
8.
H. M. E.
Miedema
and
H.
Vos
, “
Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
3432
3445
(
1998
).
9.
K. D.
Kryter
, “
Community annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
,
1212
1242
(
1982
).
10.
K. D.
Kryter
, “
Community annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise (Response of K. D. Kryter to modified comments by T. H. J. Schultz of K. D. Kryter’s paper)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
73
,
1066
1068
(
1983
).
11.
S.
Fidell
,
D. S.
Barber
, and
T. H. J.
Schultz
, “
Updating a dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportation noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
,
221
233
(
1991
).
12.
L. S.
Finegold
,
C. S.
Harris
, and
H. E.
von Gierke
, “
Community annoyance and sleep disturbance: Updated criteria for assessing the impacts of general transportation noise on people
,”
Noise Control Eng. J.
42
,
25
30
(
1994
).
13.
U.
Moehler
, “
Community response to railway noise: a review of social surveys
,”
J. Sound Vib.
120
,
321
332
(
1988
).
14.
C. G.
Rice
, “
Subjective assessment of transportation noise
,”
J. Sound Vib.
43
,
407
417
(
1975
).
15.
V.
Knall
and
R.
Schuemer
, “
The differing annoyance levels of rail and road traffic noise
,”
J. Sound Vib.
87
,
321
326
(
1983
).
16.
J. M.
Fields
and
J. G.
Walker
, “
Comparing the relationships between noise level and annoyance in different surveys: A railway noise vs. aircraft and road traffic comparison
,”
J. Sound Vib.
81
,
51
80
(
1982
).
17.
T.
Yano
,
T.
Yamashita
, and
K.
Izumi
, “
Comparison of community annoyance from railway noise evaluated by different category scales
,”
J. Sound Vib.
205
,
505
511
(
1997
).
18.
J.
Igarashi
, “
Comparison of community response to transportation noise: Japanese results and annoyance scale
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn.
13
,
301
309
(
1992
).
19.
J.
Kaku
and
I.
Yamada
, “
The possibility of a bonus for evaluating railway noise in Japan
,”
J. Sound Vib.
193
,
445
450
(
1996
).
20.
T.
Morihara
,
T.
Sato
, and
T.
Yano
, “
Comparison of dose-response relationships between railway and road traffic noises: The moderating effect of distance
,”
J. Sound Vib.
277
,
559
565
(
2004
).
21.
H. M. E.
Miedema
and
C. G. M.
Oudshoorn
, “
Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics Ldn and Lden and their confidence intervals
,”
Environ. Health Perspect.
109
,
409
416
(
2001
).
22.
C.
Lim
and
S.
Lee
, “
Questionnaire on environmental noise: The core set
,” Center for Environmental Noise and Vibration Research,
2003
.
23.
International Standard Organization (ISO), Acoustics – Assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys, ISO/TS 15666,
2003
.
24.
S.
Lee
,
S.
Min
,
J.
Park
, and
S.
Yun
,
The Practice on Logit and Probit Model
(
Pakyoungsa
,
Seoul
,
2005
).
25.
A. J.
Dobson
,
An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models
(
Chapman and Hall
, London,
1990
).
26.
P. D.
Allison
,
Logistic Regression Using the SAS System: Theory and Application
, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.,
1991
.
27.
M. M.
Hawkins
, “
Subjective evaluation of noise in areas with low ambient levels
,”
Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics Spring Conference
, 20.E6.1–4, Southampton,
1979
.
28.
Environment Agency of Japan, Report of the research on the guideline for conventional railway noise (
1994
).
29.
J.
Kaku
, “
Community response to railway noise-comparison of social survey results between Japan and other countries
,”
Proceedings of Inter-Noise 94
, Vol.
I
, p.
121
124
,
Yokohama, Japan
,
1994
.
30.
Y. T.
Lim
, “
Estimating the value of traffic noise through the analysis of housing prices
,” Ph.D. Thesis,
University of Seoul
,
2000
.
You do not currently have access to this content.