The qualification of anechoic and hemianechoic chambers requires selection of signal type and acquisition bandwidth to be used. This work demonstrates that, while a broadband random source may be used, the signal at points removed from the source are not composed of random combinations of direct and reflected waves, except in the limit of infinite bandwidth. It is shown that chamber qualification may be represented as finding the ratio of two transfer functions, where one includes the reflected waves, and the other is the free-field transfer function between the source and receiver. Consideration of this approach leads to a generic representation for the deviation from free-field performance where bandwidth is demonstrated to suppress the dominant modulation contributions of reflections. It is demonstrated that pure-tone qualifications will always exhibit a higher deviation from free-field performance than a broadband qualification. Finally, it is shown that the use of an incoherent source model in method-of-images simulations for the broadband performance of anechoic chambers is fundamentally flawed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2006
August 01 2006
On the qualification of anechoic chambers; Issues related to signals and bandwidth
Kenneth A. Cunefare;
Kenneth A. Cunefare
a)
The Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
The Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeff Badertscher;
Jeff Badertscher
The Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
The Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Search for other works by this author on:
Volker Wittstock
Volker Wittstock
b)
Department 1.7 (Applied Acoustics),
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
, Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
b)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 820–829 (2006)
Article history
Received:
August 25 2005
Accepted:
May 10 2006
Citation
Kenneth A. Cunefare, Jeff Badertscher, Volker Wittstock; On the qualification of anechoic chambers; Issues related to signals and bandwidth. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 August 2006; 120 (2): 820–829. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2211467
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Rapid detection of fish calls within diverse coral reef soundscapes using a convolutional neural network
Seth McCammon, Nathan Formel, et al.
Related Content
Ultrasonic anechoic chamber qualification: Accounting for atmospheric absorption and transducer directivity
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (July 2011)
Anechoic wedge design and development/anechoic chamber qualification testing
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2000)
High‐frequency monopole sound source for anechoic chamber qualification
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2003)
Hemi-anechoic chamber qualification and comparison of room qualification standards
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2014)
Anechoic chamber qualification: Traverse method, inverse square law analysis method, and nature of test signal
J Acoust Soc Am (January 2003)