Binaural speech intelligibility of individual listeners under realistic conditions was predicted using a model consisting of a gammatone filter bank, an independent equalization-cancellation (EC) process in each frequency band, a gammatone resynthesis, and the speech intelligibility index (SII). Hearing loss was simulated by adding uncorrelated masking noises (according to the pure-tone audiogram) to the ear channels. Speech intelligibility measurements were carried out with 8 normal-hearing and 15 hearing-impaired listeners, collecting speech reception threshold (SRT) data for three different room acoustic conditions (anechoic, office room, cafeteria hall) and eight directions of a single noise source (speech in front). Artificial EC processing errors derived from binaural masking level difference data using pure tones were incorporated into the model. Except for an adjustment of the SII-to-intelligibility mapping function, no model parameter was fitted to the SRT data of this study. The overall correlation coefficient between predicted and observed SRTs was 0.95. The dependence of the SRT of an individual listener on the noise direction and on room acoustics was predicted with a median correlation coefficient of 0.91. The effect of individual hearing impairment was predicted with a median correlation coefficient of 0.95. However, for mild hearing losses the release from masking was overestimated.
REFERENCES
1.
Akeroyd
, M. A.
(2004
). “The across frequency independence of equalization of interaural time delay in the equalization-cancellation model of binaural unmasking
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
(2
), 1135
–1148
.2.
Algazi
, V. R.
, Duda
, R. O.
, Thompson
, D. M.
, and Avendano
, C.
(2001
). “The CIPIC HRTF Database,” in Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Electroacoustics.3.
ANSI (
1969
). “Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index,” American National Standard S3.5–1969, Standards Secretariat, Acoustical Society of America.4.
ANSI (
1997
). “Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index,” American National Standard S3.5–1997, Standards Secretariat, Acoustical Society of America.5.
Blodgett
, H. C.
, Jeffress
, L. A.
, and Whitworth
, R. H.
(1962
). “Effect of noise at one ear on the masked threshold for tone at the other
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
34
(7
), 979
–981
.6.
Bradley
, J. S.
, and Bistafa
, S. R.
(2002
). “Relating speech intelligibility to useful-to-detrimental sound ratios
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
(1
), 27
–29
.7.
Brand
, T.
, and Beutelmann
, R.
(2005
). “Examination of an EC/SII based model predicting speech reception thresholds of hearing-impaired listeners in spatial noise situations,” in Proceedings of the 21st Danavox Symposium “Hearing Aid Fitting”, edited by A. N.
Rasmussen
, T.
Poulsen
, T.
Andersen
, and C. B.
Larsen
, ISBN 87–982422–0–2, Center Tryk
, Denmark, 2006
, pp. 139–151.8.
Brand
, T.
, and Kollmeier
, B.
(2002
). “Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
(6
), 2801
–2810
.9.
Breebaart
, J.
, van de Par
, S.
, and Kohlrausch
, A.
(2001a
). “Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
(2
), 1074
–1088
.10.
Breebaart
, J.
, van de Par
, S.
, and Kohlrausch
, A.
(2001b
). “Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. II. Dependence on spectral parameters
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
(2
), 1089
–1104
.11.
Bronkhorst
, A. W.
(2000
). “The Cocktail Party Phenomenon: A Review of Research on Speech Intelligibility in Multiple Talker Conditions
,” Acust. Acta Acust.
86
, 117
–128
.12.
Bronkhorst
, A. W.
, and Plomp
, R.
(1988
). “The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
(4
), 1508
–1516
.13.
Bronkhorst
, A. W.
, and Plomp
, R.
(1989
). “Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
(4
), 1374
–1383
.14.
CEN (
2000
). “Messung der Nachhallzeit von Räumen mit Hinweis auf andere akustische Parameter,” European Standard EN ISO 3382, Europäisches Komitee für Normung.15.
Colburn
, H. S.
(1977a
). “Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise.
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
(2
), 525
–533
.16.
Colburn
, H. S.
(1977b
). “Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. II. Detection of tones in noise. Supplementary material,” AIP document no. PAPS JASMA-91-525-98.17.
Culling
, J. F.
, and Colburn
, H. S.
(2000
). “Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise.
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
(1
), 517
–527
.18.
Culling
, J. F.
, and Summerfield
, Q.
(1995
). “Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: Absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delays
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
(2
), 785
–797
.19.
Duquesnoy
, A. J.
, and Plomp
, R.
(1983
). “Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural intelligibility of aged persons
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
(3
), 739
–743
.20.
Durlach
, N. I.
(1963
). “Equalization and cancellation theory of binaural masking-level differences
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
35
(8
), 1206
–1218
.21.
Durlach
, N. I.
(1972
). Binaural Signal Detection: Equalization and Cancellation Theory
(Academic
, New York), Vol. II
, Chap. 10, pp. 371
–462
.22.
Edmonds
, B. A.
, and Culling
, J. F.
(2005
). “The spatial unmasking of speech: Evidence for within-channel processing of interaural time delay
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
117
(5
), 3069
–3078
.23.
Egan
, J. P.
(1965
). “Masking level differences as a function of interaural disparities in intensity of signal and of noise
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
38
(6
), 1043
–1049
.24.
Festen
, J. M.
, and Plomp
, R.
(1986
). “Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
(2
), 465
–471
.25.
Fletcher
, H.
, and Galt
, R. H.
(1950
). “The perception of speech and its relation to telephony
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
22
(2
), 89
–151
.26.
Glasberg
, B. R.
, and Moore
, B. C. J.
(1990
). “Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched noise data
,” Hear. Res.
47
, 103
–138
.27.
Haas
, H.
(1972
). “The influence of a single echo on the audibility of speech
,” J. Audio Eng. Soc.
20
(2
), 146
–159
.28.
Hohmann
, V.
(2002
). “Frequency analysis and synthesis using a Gammatone filterbank
,” Acust. Acta Acust.
88
(3
), 433
–442
.29.
IEC (
1998
). “Sound system equipment - Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index,” International Standard IEC 60268-16.30.
Irwin
, R. J.
, and McAuley
, S. F.
(1987
). “Relations among temporal acuity, hearing loss, and the perception of speech distorted by noise and reverberation
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
(5
), 1557
–1565
.31.
Jefress
, L. A.
(1948
). “A place theory of sound localization
,” J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.
41
, 35
–39
.32.
Kohlrausch
, A.
(1990
). “Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. II. Influence of frequency and interaural-phase uncertainty
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
(4
), 1749
–1756
.33.
Langford
, T. L.
, and Jeffress
, L. A.
(1964
). “Effect of noise crosscorrelation on binaural signal detection
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
(8
), 1455
–1458
.34.
Levitt
, H.
, and Rabiner
, L. R.
(1967
). “Predicting binaural gain in intelligibility and release from masking for speech
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
42
(4
), 820
–828
.35.
Lindemann
, W.
(1986
). “Extension of a binaural cross-correlation model by contrallateral inhibition. I. Simulation of lateralization for stationary signals
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
(6
), 1608
–1622
.36.
Mesgarani
, N.
, Grant
, K. W.
, Shamma
, S.
, and Duraiswami
, R.
(2003
). “Augmented intelligibility in simultaneous multi-talker environments,” in Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Auditory Display, International Community for Auditory Display, Boston, MA, pp. 71
–74
.37.
Moncur
, J. P.
, and Dirks
, D.
(1967
). “Binaural and monural speech intelligibility in reverberation
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
10
, 186
–195
.38.
Müsch
, H.
(2003
). “MATLAB implementation of core aspects of the American National Standard ‘Methods for calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index’ ANSI S3.5-1997,” Downloadable MATLAB Script: http://www.sii.to.39.
Müsch
, H.
, and Buus
, S.
(2001a
). “Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
(6
), 2896
–2909
.40.
Müsch
, H.
, and Buus
, S.
(2001b
). “Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. II. Measurement and prediction of consonant-discrimination performance
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
(6
), 2910
–2920
.41.
Müsch
, H.
, and Buus
, S.
(2004
). “Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. III. Effect of audibility on speech recognition sensitivity
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
(4
), 2223
–2233
.42.
Nábělek
, A. K.
, and Pickett
, J. M.
(1974
). “Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
56
(2
), 628
–638
.43.
Osman
, E.
(1971
). “A correlation model of binaural masking level differences
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
6
(2
), 1494
–1511
.44.
Patterson
, R. D.
(1976
). “Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
59
(3
), 640
–654
.45.
Pavlovic
, C. V.
(1984
). “Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
75
(4
), 1253
–1258
.46.
Peissig
, J.
, and Kollmeier
, B.
(1997
). “Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
(3
), 1660
–1670
.47.
Platte
, H.-J.
, and vom Hövel
, H.
(1980
). “Zur Deutung der Ergebnisse von Sprachverständlichkeitsmessungen mit Störschall im Freifeld
,” Acustica
45
(3
), 139
–150
.48.
Plomp
, R.
(1978
). “Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
(2
), 533
–549
.49.
Plomp
, R.
, and Mimpen
, A. M.
(1981
). “Effect of the orientation of the speaker’s head and the azimuth of a noise source on the speech-reception threshold for sentences
,” Acustica
48
, 325
–328
.50.
The MathWorks (
2002
). “MATLAB®6.5.”51.
vom Hövel
, H.
(1984
). “Zur bedeutung der übertragungseigenschaften des außenohrs sowie des binauralen hörsystems bei gestörter sprach bertragng,” Dissertation, Fakultät für Elektrotechnik, RTWH Aachen
.52.
Wagener
, K.
, Brand
, T.
, Kühnel
, V.
, and Kollmeier
, B.
(1999a
). “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache. I. Design des Oldenburger Satztests
,” Zeitschrift für Audiologie/Audiological Acoustics
38
(1
), 4
–14
.53.
Wagener
, K.
, Brand
, T.
, Kühnel
, V.
, and Kollmeier
, B.
(1999b
). “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache. II. Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests
,” Zeitschrift für Audiologie/Audiological Acoustics
38
(2
), 44
–56
.54.
Wagener
, K.
, Brand
, T.
, Kühnel
, V.
, and Kollmeier
, B.
(1999c
). “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache. III. Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests
,” Zeitschrift für Audiologie/Audiological Acoustics
38
(3
), 86
–95
.55.
Zerbs
, C.
(2000
). “Modelling the effective binaural signal processing in the auditory system,” dissertation, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Universität Oldenburg
.56.
Zurek
, P. M.
(1990
). “Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility
,” in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance
, 2nd ed., edited by G. A.
Studebaker
and I.
Hockberg
(Allyn and Bacon
, London), Chap. 15, pp. 255
–276
.57.
Zwicker
, E.
, and Fastl
, H.
(1999
). Psychoacoustics - Facts and Models
, 2nd ed. (Springer
, Berlin).© 2006 Acoustical Society of America.
2006
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.