We investigated how listeners of two unrelated languages, Korean and Dutch, process phonologically viable and nonviable consonants spoken in Dutch and American English. To Korean listeners, released final stops are nonviable because word-final stops in Korean are never released in words spoken in isolation, but to Dutch listeners, unreleased word-final stops are nonviable because word-final stops in Dutch are generally released in words spoken in isolation. Two phoneme monitoring experiments showed a phonological effect on both Dutch and English stimuli: Korean listeners detected the unreleased stops more rapidly whereas Dutch listeners detected the released stops more rapidly and/or more accurately. The Koreans, however, detected released stops more accurately than unreleased stops, but only in the non-native language they were familiar with (English). The results suggest that, in non-native speech perception, phonological legitimacy in the native language can be more important than the richness of phonetic information, though familiarity with phonetic detail in the non-native language can also improve listening performance.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 01 2006
Phonological versus phonetic cues in native and non-native listening: Korean and Dutch listeners' perception of Dutch and English consonants
Taehong Cho;
Taehong Cho
a)
Hanyang University
, Division of English Language and Literature, Seoul (133-791), Korea and Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
James M. McQueen
James M. McQueen
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: tcho@hanyang.ac.kr
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 3085–3096 (2006)
Article history
Received:
July 28 2005
Accepted:
March 01 2006
Citation
Taehong Cho, James M. McQueen; Phonological versus phonetic cues in native and non-native listening: Korean and Dutch listeners' perception of Dutch and English consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 May 2006; 119 (5): 3085–3096. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2188917
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Citing articles via
Related Content
Cross-linguistic emotion recognition: Dutch, Korean, and American English
J Acoust Soc Am (September 2012)
Dutch listeners’ perception of Korean stop triplets.
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2009)
Rational phonological lengthening in spoken Dutch
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 2012)
Dutch and English listeners’ interpretation of vowel duration
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2011)
Incomplete neutralization in Dutch opacity
J Acoust Soc Am (November 2007)