The language redundancy of a syllable, measured by its predictability given its context and inherent frequency, has been shown to have a strong inverse relationship with syllabic duration. This relationship is predicted by the smooth signal redundancy hypothesis, which proposes that robust communication in a noisy environment can be achieved with an inverse relationship between language redundancy and the predictability given acoustic observations (acoustic redundancy). A general version of the hypothesis predicts similar relationships between the spectral characteristics of speech and language redundancy. However, investigating this claim is hampered by difficulties in measuring the spectral characteristics of speech within large conversational corpora, and difficulties in forming models of acoustic redundancy based on these spectral characteristics. This paper addresses these difficulties by testing the smooth signal redundancy hypothesis with a very high-quality corpus collected for speech synthesis, and presents both durational and spectral data from vowel nuclei on a vowel-by-vowel basis. Results confirm the duration/ language redundancy results achieved in previous work, and show a significant relationship between language redundancy factors and the first two formants, although these results vary considerably by vowel. In general, however, vowels show increased centralization with increased language redundancy.

1.
Adank
,
P.
(
2003
). “
Vowel Normalization: A perceptual study of Dutch Vowels
” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Nijmegan
.
2.
Anderson
,
A. H.
,
Bader
,
M.
,
Bard
,
E. G.
,
Boyle
,
E.
,
Doherty-Sneddon
,
G. M.
,
Garrod
,
S.
,
Isard
,
S.
,
Kowtko
,
J. C.
,
McAllister
,
J. M.
,
Miller
,
J. E.
,
Sotillo
,
C. F.
,
Thompson
,
H. S.
, and
Weinert
,
R.
(
1991
). “
The HCRC Map Task Corpus
,”
Lang Speech
34
(
4
),
351
366
.
3.
Aylett
,
M. P.
(
2000
). “Stochastic Suprasegmentals: Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Structure and Care of Articulation in Spontaneous Speech” (http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/matthewa/thesis_sum.html). Ph.D. thesis,
University of Edinburgh
.
4.
Aylett
,
M.
(
2001
). “
Modeling care of articulation with hmms is dangerous
,” in
Proceedings Eurospeech 01
, pp.
1491
1494
.
5.
Aylett
,
M.
, and
Turk
,
A.
(
2004
). “
The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech
,”
Lang Speech
47
,
31
56
.
6.
Bell
,
A.
,
Jurafsky
,
D.
,
Fosler-Lussier
,
E.
,
Girand
,
C.
,
Gregory
,
M.
, and
Gildea
,
D.
(
2003
). “
Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in english conversation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
1001
1024
.
7.
Bolinger
,
D.
(
1963
). “
Length, vowel, juncture
,”
Linguistics
1
,
5
29
.
8.
Bond
,
Z.
, and
Moore
,
T.
(
1994
). “
A note on the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speech
,”
Speech Commun.
14
,
325
337
.
9.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
,
Torretta
,
G. M.
, and
Pisoni
,
D. B.
(
1996
). “
Intelligibility of normal speech I. Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics
,”
Speech Commun.
20
,
255
272
.
10.
Bybee
,
J.
(
2000
). “
Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments
,” in
Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon
, edited by
M.
Broe
and
J.
Pierrehumbert
(
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge).
11.
Clarkson
,
P.
, and
Rosenfeld
,
R.
(
1997
). “
Statistical language modeling using the CMU-Cambridge toolkit
,” in
Proceedings of Eurospeech 97
, pp.
2707
2710
.
12.
Fowler
,
C. A.
, and
Housum
,
J.
(
1987
). “
Talkers’ signaling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
26
,
489
504
.
13.
Godfrey
,
J.
,
Holliman
,
E.
, and
McDaniel
,
J.
(
1992
). “
SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development
,” in
Proceedings of ICASSP-92 San Francisco
, pp.
517
520
.
14.
Jurafsky
,
D.
,
Bell
,
A.
, and
Girand
,
C.
(
2003
). “
The role of the lemma in form variation
,” in
Laboratory Phonology VII
, edited by
N.
Warner
and
C.
Gussenhoven
(
Mouton de Gruyter
, Berlin).
15.
Jurafsky
,
D.
,
Bell
,
A.
,
Gregory
,
M.
, and
Raymond
,
W.
(
2001
). “
Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production
,” in
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
, edited by
J.
Bybee
and
P.
Hopper
(
Benjamins
, Amsterdam), pp.
229
254
.
16.
Lieberman
,
P.
(
1963
). “
Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech
,”
Lang Speech
6
,
172
187
.
17.
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1990
). “
Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H & H theory
,” in
Speech Production and Speech Modeling
, edited by
W. J.
Hardcastle
and
A.
Marchal
(
Kluwer Academic
, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp.
403
439
.
18.
Moon
,
S.-J.
, and
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1994
). “
Interaction between duration, context and speaking style in English stressed vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
40
55
.
19.
Munson
,
B.
, and
Soloman
,
N.
(
2004
). “
The influence of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
47
,
1048
1058
.
20.
Nearey
,
T.
(
1992
). “
Applications of generalized linear modeling to vowel data
,” in
Proceedings ICSLP 92
, pp.
583
587
.
21.
Neter
,
J.
,
Wasserman
,
W.
, and
Kutner
,
M. H.
(
1990
).
Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design
, 3rd ed. (
Irwin
, Boston).
22.
Picheny
,
M.
,
Durlach
,
N.
, and
Braida
,
L.
(
1986
). “
Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
29
,
434
445
.
23.
Pierce
,
J. R.
(
1961
).
Symbols, Signals and Noise: The Nature and Process of Communication
(
Harper
, New York).
24.
Rosner
,
B.
, and
Pickering
,
J.
(
1994
).
Vowel Perception and Production
. (
Oxford Science Publications
, Oxford).
25.
Sharp
,
A. E.
(
1960
). “
The analysis of stress and juncture in English
,”
Transactions of the Philological Society
, pp.
104
135
.
26.
Strange
,
W.
(
1989
). “
Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
2135
2153
.
27.
Summers
,
W. V.
(
1987
). “
Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: Articulatory and acoustic analyses
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
847
863
.
28.
Talkin
,
D.
(
1987
). “
Speech formant trajectory estimation using dynamic programming with modulated transition costs
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
, Suppl. 1,
S55
.
29.
van Bergem
,
D. R.
(
1993
). “
Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class
,”
Speech Commun.
12
,
1
23
.
30.
van Son
,
R. J. J. H.
, and
Pols
,
L. C. W.
(
1999
). “
An acoustic profile of consonant reduction
,”
Speech Commun.
28
,
125
140
.
31.
van Son
,
R. J. J. H.
, and
Pols
,
L. C. W.
(
2003
). “
How efficient is speech?
,” Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Proceedings,
25
, pp.
171
184
.
32.
Wells
,
J. C.
(
1982
).
Accents of English
(
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge), Vol.
3
.
33.
Wright
,
R.
(
2003
). “
Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation
,” in
Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Phonetic Interpretation
, edited by
J.
Local
,
R.
Ogden
, and
R.
Temple
(
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge).
34.
Young
,
S.
,
Jansen
,
J.
,
Odell
,
J.
,
Ollason
,
D.
, and
Woodland
,
P.
(
1996
).
The HTK Book
, Entropic. Version 2.00.
35.
Zipf
,
G. K.
(
1949
).
Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort
(
Addison-Wesley
, Reading, MA).
You do not currently have access to this content.