Detection thresholds for tones in narrow-band noise were measured for two binaural configurations: and . The noise band had a mean overall level of SPL and was centered on 250, 500, or . Signals and noise were simultaneously gated for 500, 110, or . Three conditions of level randomization were tested: (1) no randomization; (2) diotic randomization—the stimulus level (common to both ears) was randomly chosen from an uniformly distributed range every presentation interval; and (3) dichotic randomization—the stimulus levels for each ear were each independently and randomly chosen from the range. Regardless of binaural configuration, level randomization had small effects on thresholds at 500 and , implying that binaural masking-level differences (BMLDs) do not depend on interaural level differences for individual stimuli. For stimuli, both diotic and dichotic randomization led to markedly poorer performance than at 500- and 110-ms durations; BMLDs diminished with no randomization and dichotic randomization but not with diotic randomization. The loss of BMLDs at , with degrees-of-freedom (2WT) approximately 1, implies that changes in intracranial parameters occurring during the course of the observation interval are necessary for BMLDs when mean-level and mean-intracranial-position cues have been made unhelpful.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2005
November 01 2005
The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference Available to Purchase
G. Bruce Henning;
G. Bruce Henning
Hearing Research Center, Biomedical Engineering Department,
Boston University
, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 and the SRU, Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University
, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Virginia M. Richards;
Virginia M. Richards
Department of Psychology,
University of Pennsylvania
, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Search for other works by this author on:
Jennifer J. Lentz
Jennifer J. Lentz
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences,
Indiana University, Bloomington
, Indiana 47405
Search for other works by this author on:
G. Bruce Henning
Hearing Research Center, Biomedical Engineering Department,
Boston University
, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 and the SRU, Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University
, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom
Virginia M. Richards
Department of Psychology,
University of Pennsylvania
, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Jennifer J. Lentz
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences,
Indiana University, Bloomington
, Indiana 47405J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3229–3240 (2005)
Article history
Received:
April 27 2004
Accepted:
August 08 2005
Citation
G. Bruce Henning, Virginia M. Richards, Jennifer J. Lentz; The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 2005; 118 (5): 3229–3240. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2047167
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
The role of across-frequency processes in dichotic listening conditions
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (December 2009)
Combination of masking releases for different center frequencies and masker amplitude statistics
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2009)
Binaural notched-noise masking and auditory-filter shape
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (April 2013)
Frequency selectivity in diotic and dichotic masking conditions for normal‐hearing and hearing‐impaired listeners
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2008)
An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2009)