This study investigates the effects of lexical frequency on the durational reduction of morphologically complex words in spoken Dutch. The hypothesis that high-frequency words are more reduced than low-frequency words was tested by comparing the durations of affixes occurring in different carrier words. Four Dutch affixes were investigated, each occurring in a large number of words with different frequencies. The materials came from a large database of face-to-face conversations. For each word containing a target affix, one token was randomly selected for acoustic analysis. Measurements were made of the duration of the affix as a whole and the durations of the individual segments in the affix. For three of the four affixes, a higher frequency of the carrier word led to shorter realizations of the affix as a whole, individual segments in the affix, or both. Other relevant factors were the sex and age of the speaker, segmental context, and speech rate. To accommodate for these findings, models of speech production should allow word frequency to affect the acoustic realizations of lower-level units, such as individual speech sounds occurring in affixes.

1.
Adank
,
P.
,
Van Hout
,
R.
, and
Smits
,
R.
(
2004
). “
An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
1729
1738
.
2.
Aylett
,
M.
, and
Turk
,
A.
(
2004
). “
The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech
,”
Lang Speech
47
,
31
56
.
3.
Balota
,
D.
,
Boland
,
J.
, and
Shields
,
L.
(
1989
). “
Priming in pronunciation: beyond pattern recognition and onset latency
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
28
,
14
36
.
4.
Bard
,
E.
,
Anderson
,
A.
,
Sotillo
,
C.
,
Aylett
,
M.
,
Doherty-Sneddon
,
G.
, and
Newlands
,
A.
(
2000
). “
Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
42
,
1
22
.
5.
Bell
,
A.
,
Jurafsky
,
D.
,
Fosler-Lussier
,
E.
,
Girand
,
C.
,
Gregory
,
M.
, and
Gildea
,
D.
(
2003
). “
Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
1001
1024
.
6.
Bock
,
J.
(
1995
). “
Sentence production: From mind to mouth
,” in
Handbook of Perception and Cognition, Vol. 11: Speech, language, and communication
, edited by
J.
Miller
and
P.
Eimas
(
Academic
, New York), pp.
181
216
.
7.
Boersma
,
P.
(
2001
). “
Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer
,”
Glot Int.
5
,
341
355
.
8.
Booij
,
G. E.
(
1995
).
The Phonology of Dutch
(
Clarendon
, Oxford).
9.
Browman
,
C.
, and
Goldstein
,
L.
(
1992
). “
Articulatory phonology: An overview
,”
Phonetica
49
,
155
180
.
10.
Bush
,
N.
(
2001
). “
Frequency effects and word-boundary palatalization in English
,” in
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
, edited by
J.
Bybee
and
P.
Hopper
(
Benjamins
, Amsterdam), pp.
255
280
.
11.
Bybee
,
J. L.
(
2001
).
Phonology and Language Use
(
Cambridge U.P.
, Cambridge).
12.
Byrd
,
D.
(
1994
). “
Relations of sex and dialect to reduction
,”
Speech Commun.
15
,
39
54
.
13.
Cambier-Langeveld
,
T.
(
2000
).
Temporal Marking of Accents and Boundaries
(
LOT
, Utrecht).
14.
Chatterjee
,
S.
,
Hadi
,
A.
, and
Price
,
B.
(
2000
).
Regression Analysis by Example
(
Wiley
, New York).
15.
Cooper
,
W.
, and
Paccia-Cooper
,
J.
(
1980
).
Syntax & Speech
(
Harvard U.P.
, Cambridge, MA).
16.
Dell
,
G.
(
1986
). “
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production
,”
Psychol. Rev.
93
,
283
321
.
17.
Ernestus
,
M.
(
2000
).
Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch, a Corpus-based Study of the Phonology-Phonetics Interface
(
LOT
, Utrecht).
18.
Fosler-Lussier
,
E.
, and
Morgan
,
N.
(
1999
). “
Effects of speaking rate and word frequency on pronunciations in conversational speech
,”
Speech Commun.
29
,
137
158
.
19.
Fougeron
,
C.
, and
Keating
,
P.
(
1997
). “
Articulatory strengthening at the edges of prosodic domains
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
,
3728
3740
.
20.
Fowler
,
C.
, and
Housum
,
J.
(
1987
). “
Talkers’ Signalling of New and Old Words in Speech and Listeners’ Perception and Use of the Distinction
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
26
,
489
504
.
21.
Fox Tree
,
J.
, and
Clark
,
H.
(
1997
). “
Pronouncing ‘the’ as ‘thee’ to signal problems in speaking
,”
Cognition
62
,
151
167
.
22.
Garrett
,
M.
(
1975
). “
The analysis of sentence production
,” in
The psychology of learning and motivation
, edited by
G.
Bower
(
Academic
, New York), pp.
133
178
.
23.
Gregory
,
M.
,
Raymond
,
W.
,
Bell
,
A.
,
Fosler-Lussier
,
E.
, and
Jurafsky
,
D.
(
1999
). “
The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production
,”
Chicago Ling. Soc.
35
,
151
166
.
24.
Hay
,
J.
(
2003
).
Causes and Consequences of Word Structure
(
Routledge
, New York).
25.
Hunnicutt
,
S.
(
1985
). “
Intelligibility versus redundancy—conditions of dependency
,”
Lang Speech
28
,
47
56
.
27.
Jespersen
,
O.
(
1922
).
Language: its nature, development and origin
(
George Allen & Unwin
, London).
28.
Johnson
,
K.
(
2004
). “
Massive reduction in conversational American English
,” in
Spontaneous speech: data and analysis. Proceedings of the 1st session of the 10th international symposium
(
The National International Institute for Japanese Language
, Tokyo, Japan), pp.
29
54
.
29.
Jurafsky
,
D.
,
Bell
,
A.
,
Gregory
,
M.
, and
Raymond
,
W.
(
2001
). “
Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production
,” in
Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure
, edited by
J.
Bybee
and
P.
Hopper
(
Benjamins
, Amsterdam), pp.
229
254
.
30.
Keune
,
K.
,
Ernestus
,
M.
,
Van Hout
,
R.
, and
Baayen
,
R. H.
, (
2005
). “
Social, geographical, and register variation in Dutch: From written ‘mogelijk’ to spoken ‘mok,’
,”
Corpus Linguist. Linguist. Theor.
2
.
31.
Landauer
,
T. K.
, and
Dumais
,
S.
(
1997
). “
A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge
,”
Psychol. Rev.
104
,
211
240
.
32.
Landauer
,
T. K.
, and
Streeter
,
L. A.
(
1973
). “
Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition
,”
J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav.
12
,
119
131
.
33.
Levelt
,
W. J. M.
(
1989
).
Speaking. From Intention to Articulation
(
MIT
, Cambridge, MA).
34.
Levelt
,
W. J. M.
,
Roelofs
,
A.
, and
Meyer
,
A. S.
(
1999
). “
A theory of lexical access in speech production
,”
Behav. Brain Sci.
22
,
1
38
.
35.
Nooteboom
,
S. G.
(
1972
).
Production and Perception of Vowel Duration: A Study of the Durational Properties of Vowels in Dutch
(
University of Utrecht
, Utrecht).
36.
Oostdijk
,
N.
(
2000
). “
The Spoken Dutch Corpus project
,”
ELRA Newsletter
5
,
4
8
.
37.
Pierrehumbert
,
J. B.
(
2003
). “
Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness
,” in
Probability Theory in Linguistics
, edited by
R.
Bod
,
J.
Hay
, and
S.
Jannedy
, (
MIT
, Cambridge, MA), pp.
177
228
.
38.
Pluymaekers
,
M.
,
Ernestus
,
M.
, and
Baayen
,
R. H.
Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy
,” Phonetica (submitted).
39.
Sevald
,
C.
,
Dell
,
G.
, and
Cole
,
J.
(
1995
). “
Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas?
,”
J. Mem. Lang.
34
,
807
820
.
40.
Shields
,
L.
, and
Balota
,
D.
(
1991
). “
Repetition and associative context effects in speech production
,”
Lang Speech
34
,
47
55
.
41.
Umeda
,
N.
(
1977
). “
Consonant duration in American English
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
846
858
.
42.
Van Coile
,
B.
(
1987
). “
A model of phoneme durations based on the analysis of a read Dutch text
,” in
Proc. Europ. Conf. Speech Techn., vol. 2
, edited by
J.
Laver
and
M.
Jack
Edinburgh
, United Kingdom, pp.
233
236
.
43.
Van Son
,
R.
, and
Pols
,
L.
(
2003
). “
Information structure and efficiency in speech production
,”
Proc. Eurospeech-2003
,
Geneva
, Switzerland.
44.
Vorstermans
,
A.
,
Martens
,
J.
, and
Van Coile
,
B.
(
1996
). “
Automatic segmentation and labelling of multi-lingual speech data
,”
Speech Commun.
19
,
271
293
.
45.
Wright
,
C.
(
1979
). “
Duration differences between rare and common words and their implications for the interpretation of word frequency effects
,”
Mem. Cognit.
7
(
6
),
411
419
.
46.
Zipf
,
G.
(
1929
). “
Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change
,”
Harv. Studies Classi Philol.
15
,
1
95
.
47.
Zsiga
,
E.
(
1994
). “
Acoustic evidence for gestural overlap in consonant sequences
,”
J. Phonetics
22
,
121
140
.
You do not currently have access to this content.