This study explores the effects of hearing status and bite blocks on vowel production. Normal-hearing controls and postlingually deaf adults read elicitation lists of ∕hVd∕ syllables with and without bite blocks and auditory feedback. Deaf participants’ auditory feedback was provided by a cochlear prosthesis and interrupted by switching off their implant microphones. Recording sessions were held before prosthesis was provided and one month and one year after. Long-term absence of auditory feedback was associated with heightened dispersion of vowel tokens, which was inflated further by inserting bite blocks. The restoration of some hearing with prosthesis reduced dispersion. Deaf speakers’ vowel spaces were reduced in size compared to controls. Insertion of bite blocks reduced them further because of the speakers’ incomplete compensation. A year of prosthesis use increased vowel contrast with feedback during elicitation. These findings support the inference that models of speech production must assign a role to auditory feedback in error-based correction of feedforward commands for subsequent articulatory gestures.

1.
Baum
,
S. R.
,
McFarland
,
D. H.
, and
Diab
,
M.
(
1996
). “
Compensation to articulatory perturbation: Perceptual data
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
,
3791
3794
.
2.
Blamey
,
P. J.
,
Dowell
,
R. C.
,
Brown
,
A. M.
,
Clark
,
G. M.
, and
Seligman
,
P. M.
(
1987
). “
Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
48
57
.
3.
Burnett
,
T. A.
,
Freedland
,
M. B.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
, and
Hain
,
T. C.
(
1998
). “
Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3153
3161
.
4.
Campbell
,
M.
(
1999
). “
Articulatory compensation for a biteblock, with and without auditory feedback in hearing and hearing-impaired speakers
,” Doctoral dissertation,
City University of New York
(unpublished).
5.
Economou
,
A.
,
Tartter
,
V.
,
Chute
,
P.
, and
Hellman
,
S.
(
1992
). “
Speech changes following reimplantation from a single-channel to a multichannel cochlear implant
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
1310
1323
.
6.
Flege
,
J. E.
,
Fletcher
,
S. G.
, and
Homiedan
,
A.
(
1988
). “
Compensating for a bite block in ∕s∕ and ∕t∕ production: Palatographic, acoustic, and perceptual data
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
212
228
.
7.
Fowler
,
C. A.
, and
Turvey
,
M. T.
(
1980
). “
Immediate compensation in bite-block speech
,”
Phonetica
37
,
306
326
.
8.
Guenther
,
F.
, and
Perkell
,
J.
(
2004
). “
A neural model of speech production and its application to studies of the role of auditory feedback in speech
,” in
Speech Motor Control in Normal and Disordered Speech
, edited by
B.
Maassen
,
R.
Kent
,
H. F.M.
Peters
,
P.
Lieshout
, and
W.
Hulstijn
(
Oxford University Press
, Oxford), pp.
29
50
.
9.
Guenther
,
F. H.
(
1994
). “
A neural network model of speech acquisition and motor equivalent speech production
,”
Biol. Cybern.
72
,
43
53
.
10.
Guenther
,
F. H.
(
1995
). “
Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production
,”
Psychol. Rev.
102
,
594
621
.
11.
Guenther
,
F. H.
,
Hampson
,
M.
, and
Johnson
,
D.
(
1998
). “
A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements
,”
Psychol. Rev.
105
,
611
633
.
12.
Hain
,
T. C.
,
Burnett
,
T. A.
,
Larson
,
C. R.
, and
Kiran
,
S.
(
2001
). “
Effects of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) on the pitch-shift reflex
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
2146
2152
.
13.
Harris
,
K. S.
,
Rubin-Spitz
,
J.
, and
McGarr
,
N.
(
1985
). “
The role of production variability in normal and deviant developing speech
,”
ASHA Reports
15
,
50
57
.
14.
Hoole
,
P.
(
1987
). “
Bite-block speech in the absence of oral sensibility
,” in
Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences Tallinn
, pp.
16
19
.
15.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
(
1998
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production
,”
Science
279
,
1213
1216
.
16.
Houde
,
J. F.
, and
Jordan
,
M. I.
(
2002
). “
Sensorimotor adaptation of speech. I. Compensation and adaptation
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
45
,
295
310
.
17.
Jones
,
J. A.
, and
Munhall
,
K. G.
(
2003
). “
Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: The role of auditory feedback
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
532
543
.
18.
Kawahara
,
H.
, and
Williams
,
J. C.
(
1996
). “
Effects of auditory feedback on voice pitch trajectories: Characteristic responses to pitch perturbations
,” in
Vocal fold Physiology
, edited by
P. J.
Davis
and
N. H.
Fletcher
(
Singular
, San Diego), pp.
263
278
.
19.
Lane
,
H.
,
Matthies
,
M.
,
Denny
,
M.
,
Guenther
,
F. H.
,
Perkell
,
J. S.
,
Stockmann
,
E.
 et al (
2005
). “
Effects of short- and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts
,”
Ear Hear.
(submitted).
20.
Lane
,
H.
, and
Tranel
,
B.
(
1971
). “
The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
14
,
677
709
.
21.
Lane
,
H.
,
Wozniak
,
J.
,
Matthies
,
M.
,
Svirsky
,
M.
, and
Perkell
,
J.
(
1995
). “
Phonemic resetting vs. postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: An exploration of voice-onset time
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
3096
3106
.
22.
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1990
). “
Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H & H theory
,” in
Speech Production and Speech Modeling
, edited by
W. J.
Hardcastle
and
A.
Marchal
(
Kluwer
, Dordrecht), pp.
403
439
.
23.
Lindblom
,
B.
,
Lubker
,
J.
, and
Gay
,
T.
(
1978
). “
Formant frequencies of some fixed mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predictive simulation
,”
J. Phonetics
7
,
147
161
.
24.
Lindblom
,
B. E.
, and
Sundberg
,
J. E.
(
1971
). “
Acoustical consequences of lip, tongue, jaw, and larynx movement
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
50
,
1166
1179
.
25.
Lindblom
,
B. E.F.
(
1980
). “
Phonetic universals in vowel systems
,” in
Experimental Phonology
, edited by
J. J.
Ohala
and
J. J.
Jaeger
(
Academic
, Orlando, FL), pp.
13
44
.
26.
Lubker
,
J. F.
(
1979
). “
The reorganization times of bite-block vowels
,”
Phonetica
36
,
273
293
.
27.
Matthies
,
M.
,
Svirsky
,
M.
,
Perkell
,
J.
, and
Lane
,
H.
(
1996
). “
Acoustic and articulatory measures of sibilant production with and without auditory feedback from a cochlear implant
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
39
,
936
946
.
28.
McFarland
,
D. H.
, and
Baum
,
S. R.
(
1995
). “
Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1865
1873
.
29.
McGarr
,
N. S.
, and
Campbell
,
M.
(
1995
). “
Ephphatha: Opening inroads to understanding articulatory organization in persons with hearing impairment
,” in
Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues: For Katherine Safford Harris
, edited by
F.
Bell-Berti
and
L.
Raphael
(
AIP Press
, New York), pp.
433
404
.
30.
McKay
,
C. M.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
1993
). “
Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the spectral maxima sound processor (SMSP) and the mini speech processor (MSP)
,”
Ear Hear.
14
,
350
367
.
31.
Natke
,
U.
, and
Kalveram
,
K. T.
(
2001
). “
Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
44
,
577
584
.
32.
Perkell
,
J.
,
Lane
,
H.
,
Svirsky
,
M.
, and
Webster
,
J.
(
1992
). “
Speech of cochlear implant patients: A longitudinal study of vowel production
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
2961
2978
.
34.
Picheny
,
M. A.
,
Durlach
,
N. I.
, and
Braida
,
L. D.
(
1986
). “
Speaking clearly for the hard-of-hearing II. Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
29
,
434
446
.
35.
Siegel
,
G. M.
,
Schork
,
E. J.
,
Pick
,
H. L.
, and
Garber
,
S. R.
(
1982
). “
Parameters of auditory feedback
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
25
,
473
475
.
36.
Svirsky
,
M.
,
Lane
,
H.
,
Perkell
,
J.
, and
Wozniak
,
J.
(
1992
). “
Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
1284
1300
.
37.
Taguchi
,
G.
, and
Jugulum
,
R.
(
2002
).
The Mahalanobis-Taguchi Strategy : A Pattern Technology System
(
Wiley
, New York).
38.
Tye
,
N.
,
Zimmermann
,
G.
, and
Kelso
,
S.
(
1983
). “
 ‘Compensatory articulation’ in hearing-impaired speakers: A cinefluorographic study
,”
J. Phonetics
11
,
101
115
.
39.
Wilson
,
B.
,
Lawson
,
D.
,
Zerbi
,
M.
,
Finley
,
C.
, and
Wolford
,
R.
(
1995
). “
New processing strategies in cochlear implantation
,”
Am. J. Otol.
16
,
669
681
.
You do not currently have access to this content.