The field test method for determining the Field Impact Isolation Class (FIIC) rating of a floor/ceiling assembly, prescribed in ASTM E 1007, requires an estimation of the receiving room absorption and the normalization of the receiving room sound pressure levels based on a standard quantity of room absorption. Normalization is intended to remove the effects of receiving room acoustical characteristics, but an analysis of field impact testing indicates that this method has a limited engineering value. The normalization correction is strongly dependent on receiving room volume, does not correlate with the normalization used in airborne sound isolation testing, and can be unreasonably large under certain conditions. The current test method leads to potential errors in engineering judgment, as illustrated by example field tests. By contrast, airborne noise reduction ratings (prescribed in ASTM E 336) are either non-normalized or normalized to a standard reverberation time, which provides significant advantages over normalizing to a standard amount of absorption. New impact noise metrics, the non-normalized impact sound rating (ISR) and the normalized impact sound rating (NISR), analogous to the airborne noise reduction metrics NIC and NNIC, are proposed for incorporation into ASTM E 1007. Revised building code requirements using the proposed metrics are suggested.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
August 2005
August 01 2005
Field impact insulation testing: Inadequacy of existing normalization methods and proposal for new ratings analogous to those for airborne noise reduction
John J. LoVerde;
John J. LoVerde
Veneklasen Associates, Inc.
, 1711 Sixteenth Street, Santa Monica, California 90404
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Wayland Dong
D. Wayland Dong
Veneklasen Associates, Inc.
, 1711 Sixteenth Street, Santa Monica, California 90404
Search for other works by this author on:
John J. LoVerde
D. Wayland Dong
Veneklasen Associates, Inc.
, 1711 Sixteenth Street, Santa Monica, California 90404J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 638–646 (2005)
Article history
Received:
March 29 2004
Accepted:
May 12 2005
Citation
John J. LoVerde, D. Wayland Dong; Field impact insulation testing: Inadequacy of existing normalization methods and proposal for new ratings analogous to those for airborne noise reduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 August 2005; 118 (2): 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1946267
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
I can't hear you without my glasses
Tessa Bent
Related Content
The use and application of pressure-based acoustical metrics adopted within the International Building Code
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2022)
Field normalization techniques and practices for determining sound isolation and impact insulation
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2003)
Field airborne sound isolation in multifamily construction evaluation of metrics within ASTM E336
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2006)
Improving FSTC (field sound transmission class) and FIIC (field‐impact isolation class) of standard wall and floor/ceiling configurations.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (March 2010)
A method to prove violation of building code sound insulation standards in small condominiums
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2003)