The field test method for determining the Field Impact Isolation Class (FIIC) rating of a floor/ceiling assembly, prescribed in ASTM E 1007, requires an estimation of the receiving room absorption and the normalization of the receiving room sound pressure levels based on a standard quantity of room absorption. Normalization is intended to remove the effects of receiving room acoustical characteristics, but an analysis of field impact testing indicates that this method has a limited engineering value. The normalization correction is strongly dependent on receiving room volume, does not correlate with the normalization used in airborne sound isolation testing, and can be unreasonably large under certain conditions. The current test method leads to potential errors in engineering judgment, as illustrated by example field tests. By contrast, airborne noise reduction ratings (prescribed in ASTM E 336) are either non-normalized or normalized to a standard reverberation time, which provides significant advantages over normalizing to a standard amount of absorption. New impact noise metrics, the non-normalized impact sound rating (ISR) and the normalized impact sound rating (NISR), analogous to the airborne noise reduction metrics NIC and NNIC, are proposed for incorporation into ASTM E 1007. Revised building code requirements using the proposed metrics are suggested.

1.
T. J.
Schultz
, “
Impact-noise recommendations for the FHA
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
,
729
739
(
1964
).
2.
ASTM E 336-97e1, “
Standard test method for measurement of airborne sound insulation in buildings
,” ASTM International.
3.
ASTM E 1007-04e1, “
Standard test method for field measurement of tapping machine impact sound transmission through floor–ceiling assemblies and associated support structures
,” ASTM International.
4.
For example, Ref. 1. A more detailed discussion is in Sec. ???.
5.
Reference 2, Sec. 3.2.2 and Note 1.
6.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Acoustical measurements in some Canadian homes
,”
Can. Acoust.
14
,
14
(
1986
).
7.
Reference 2, Sec. 11.4, Note 12.
8.
O.
Brandt
, “
European experience with sound-insulation requirements
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
36
,
719
724
(
1964
).
9.
L. L.
Beranek
,
Acoustics
(
Acoustical Society of America through the American Institute of Physics, Inc.
, Woodbury, NY,
1996
), Chap. 10, pp.
315
316
.
10.
Uniform Building Code with California Building Code modifications, Appendix Chap. 12, Division IIA, Sound Transmission Control.
You do not currently have access to this content.