The influence on a piano tone from weak coexcitation of damped adjacent tones due to coupling via the bridge is studied. The frequency and amplitude modulation of the sound resulting from coexcitation of one strong and one or two weak tones is analyzed. One weak tone causes frequency and amplitude modulation of the sound, and two weak tones produce beating frequency and amplitude modulation, where the beatings of the two modulations are of opposite phase. By digital recording of the sound of piano tones, the appearance of these phenomena is verified. The audibility of the observed frequency and amplitude modulation is discussed in terms of previously determined detection thresholds. The beating character of both frequency and amplitude modulations, however, distinguishes the phenomena from those previously studied and prompts further psychoacoustic investigations. It is shown that detuning of unison strings may significantly increase the frequency deviation of the frequency modulation in conjunction with affected amplitude modulation. The modulatory effects of coupling to adjacent tones therefore may possibly be utilized in the tuning process. A coupling of tones analogous to the situation in a piano may arise in other stringed musical instruments transferring string vibrations to a soundboard via a bridge.

1.
H. von Helmholtz, Die Lehre von Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik, first edition 1862, English translation of the fourth edition 1885 by A. J. Ellis, On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, reprinted by Dover Publications, New York, 1954.
2.
Five Lectures on the Acoustics of the Piano, edited by A. Askenfelt (Royal Swedish Academy of Music, Stockholm, 1990). A www edition is available at 〈www.speech.kth.se/music/5_lectures〉.
3.
N. H. Fletcher and T. D. Rossing, The Physics of Musical Instruments, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1998).
4.
H. A.
Conklin
, Jr.
, “
Design and tone in the mechanoacoustic piano. I. Piano hammers and tonal effects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
,
3286
3296
(
1996
).
5.
H. A.
Conklin
, Jr.
, “
Design and tone in the mechanoacoustic piano. II. Piano structure
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
695
708
(
1996
).
6.
H. A.
Conklin
, Jr.
, “
Design and tone in the mechanoacoustic piano. III. Piano strings and scale design
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
1286
1298
(
1996
).
7.
D. E.
Hall
, “
Piano string excitation in the case of small hammer mass
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
,
141
147
(
1986
).
8.
D. E.
Hall
, “
Piano string excitation. II. General solution for a hard narrow hammer
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
535
546
(
1987
).
9.
D. E.
Hall
, “
Piano string excitation. III. General solution for a soft narrow hammer
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
547
555
(
1987
).
10.
H.
Suzuki
, “
Model analysis of hammer–string interaction
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
1145
1151
(
1987
).
11.
D. E.
Hall
and
P.
Clark
, “
Piano string excitation. IV. The question of the missing modes
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
1913
1918
(
1987
).
12.
X.
Boutillon
, “
Model for piano hammers: Experimental determination and digital simulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
746
754
(
1988
).
13.
D. E.
Hall
and
A.
Askenfelt
, “
Piano string excitation. V. Spectra for real hammers and strings
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
83
,
1627
1638
(
1988
).
14.
A.
Askenfelt
and
E.
Jansson
, “
From touch to string vibrations. I. Timing in the grand piano action
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
,
52
63
(
1990
).
15.
A.
Askenfelt
and
E.
Jansson
, “
From touch to string vibrations. II. The motion of the key and hammer
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
2383
2393
(
1991
).
16.
D. E.
Hall
, “
Piano string excitation. VI. Nonlinear modeling
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
95
105
(
1992
).
17.
A.
Askenfelt
and
E.
Jansson
, “
From touch to string vibrations. III. String motion and spectra
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2181
2196
(
1993
).
18.
O. L.
Railsback
, “
A chromatic stroboscope
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
9
,
37
42
(
1937
).
19.
O. L.
Railsback
, “
Scale temperament as applied to piano tuning
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
9
,
274
(
1938
).
20.
O. L.
Railsback
, “
A study of the tuning of pianos
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
10
,
86
(
1938
).
21.
O. H.
Schuck
and
R. W.
Young
, “
Observations on the vibrations of piano strings
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
15
,
1
11
(
1943
).
22.
R. W.
Young
, “
Inharmonicity of plain wire piano strings
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
24
,
267
273
(
1952
).
23.
D. W.
Martin
, “
Decay rates of piano tones
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
19
,
535
541
(
1947
).
24.
D. W.
Martin
and
W. D.
Ward
, “
Subjective evaluation of musical scale temperament in pianos
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
26
,
932
(
1954
);
D. W.
Martin
and
W. D.
Ward
,
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
33
,
582
585
(
1961
).
25.
R. E.
Kirk
, “
Tuning preferences for piano unison groups
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
31
,
1644
1648
(
1959
).
26.
G.
Weinreich
, “
Coupled piano strings
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
62
,
1474
1484
(
1977
).
27.
G.
Weinreich
, “
The coupled motions of piano strings
,”
Sci. Am.
240
(
1
),
118
127
(
1979
).
28.
G. Weinreich, “The coupled motion of piano strings,” in Ref. 2.
29.
B.
Capleton
, “
False beats in coupled piano string unisons
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
885
892
(
2004
).
30.
W. M. Hartmann, Signals, Sound, and Sensation (Springer, New York, 1998).
31.
A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer, Discrete-Time Signal Processing (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989).
32.
E. G.
Shower
and
R.
Biddulph
, “
Differential pitch sensitivity of the ear
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
3
,
275
287
(
1931
).
33.
E.
Zwicker
, “
Die Grenzen der Hörbarkeit der Amplitudenmodulation und der Frequenzmodulation Eines Tones
,”
Acustica
2
,
AB
125
(
1952
).
34.
E.
Zwicker
, “
Die elementaren Grundlagen zur Bestimmung der Informationskapazität des Gehörs
,”
Acustica
6
,
365
381
(
1956
).
35.
E. Zwicker and R. Feldtkeller, Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfänger, 2nd ed. (Hirzel, Stuttgart, 1967).
36.
L.
Demany
and
C.
Semal
, “
Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
1295
1301
(
1989
).
37.
C. C.
Wier
,
W.
Jesteadt
, and
D. M.
Green
, “
Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
178
184
(
1977
).
38.
E.
Ozimek
and
A.
Sek
, “
Perception of amplitude and frequency modulated signals (mixed modulation)
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
1598
1603
(
1987
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.