Noise pollution is recognized as a potential danger to marine mammals in general, and to the St. Lawrence beluga in particular. One method of determining the impacts of noise on an animal’s communication is to observe a natural and repeatable response of the vocal system to variations in noise level. This is accomplished by observing intensity changes in animal vocalizations in response to environmental noise. One such response observed in humans, songbirds, and some primates is the Lombard vocal response. This response represents a vocal system reaction manifested by changes in vocalization level in direct response to changes in the noise field. In this research, a population of belugas in the St. Lawrence River Estuary was tested to determine whether a Lombard response existed by using hidden Markhov-classified vocalizations as targets for acoustical analyses. Correlation and regression analyses of signals and noise indicated that the phenomenon does exist. Further, results of human subjects experiments [Egan, J. J. (1966), Ph.D. dissertation; Scheifele, P. M. (2003), Ph.D. dissertation], along with previously reported data from other animal species, are similar to those exhibited by the belugas. Overall, findings suggest that typical noise levels in the St. Lawrence River Estuary have a detectable effect on the communication of the beluga.

1.
Au, W. W. L. (1993). The Sonar of Dolphins (Springer, New York), p. 34.
2.
Boersma, P., and Weenink, D. (2003). “PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer,” University of Amsterdam, Netherlands. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/. Viewed 12 November 2003.
3.
Bradbury, J. W., and Vehrencamp, S. L. (1998). Principles of Animal Communication (Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts), pp. 1–16.
4.
Clemins, P. J., and Johnsosn, M. T. (2003). “Application of speech recognition to African elephant (Loxodonta Africana) vocalizations,” Proceedings ICASSP-03.
5.
Cynx
,
J.
,
Lewis
,
R.
,
Tavel
,
B.
, and
Tse
,
H.
(
1998
). “
Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by 2 songbird (Taeniopygia guttata)
,”
Animal Behavior
56
,
107
113
.
6.
Egan, J. J. (1966). “Psychoacoustics of the Lombard Voice reflex,” Ph.D. dissertation, Case Western Reserve University.
7.
Egnor, S. E., Dingle, K., Guvench, A., Hicks, C., and Hauser, M. D. (2003). The Lombard Effect on the Cotton-top Tamarin (Saguinus oedipus). Presentation given at the First International Conference on Acoustic Communication by Animals, July 27–30, at the University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
8.
Guenther, F. H. (2001). “Neural modeling of speech production,” Proceedings of the 4th International Nijmegen Speech Motor Conference, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 13–16 June, 2001.
9.
Lane
,
H.
, and
Tranel
,
B.
(
1971
). “
The Lombard Sign and the role of hearing in speech
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
14
,
677
709
.
10.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
11.
Lombard, E. (1911). “L’indication de l’elevation de la voix,” Annales Des Malades de l”creille, Vol. 37, No. 2.
12.
Manabe
,
K.
,
Sadr
,
E. I.
, and
Dooling
,
R. J.
(
1998
). “
Control of vocal intensity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): Differential reinforcement of vocal intensity and the Lombard Effect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
1190
1198
.
13.
MathWorks. (2003). “MATLAB: The language of technical computing,” Natick, MA. http://www.mathworks.com/
14.
Milenkovic, P. H. (1999). “Moments: Batch Spectral Moments Analysis,” University of Wisconsin-Madison. (http://www.wisc.edu/cgi-n/ wisc.ph/ph.cgi?source=brief.xml&name=Paul+H+Milenkovic&email=&division=&phone=). Created 1999 and accessed 2003.
15.
Potash
,
L. M.
(
1972
). “
A signal detection problem and a possible solution in Japanese quail
,”
Anim. Behav.
20
,
192
195
.
16.
Scheifele, P. M. (2003). “Investigation of the response of the auditory and acoustic communications systems in the beluga whale of the St. Lawrence River Estuary to noise using vocal classification,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
17.
Sinott
,
J. M.
,
Stebbins
,
W. C.
, and
Moody
,
D. B.
(
1975
). “
Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
58
,
412
414
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.