Birds often sing from high perches referred to as song posts. However, birds also listen and keep a lookout from these perches. We used a sound transmission experiment to investigate the changes for receiving and sending conditions that a territorial songbird may experience by moving upwards in the vegetation. Representative song elements of the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla were transmitted in a forest habitat in spring using a complete factorial design with natural transmission distances and speaker and microphone heights. Four aspects of sound degradation were quantified: signal-to-noise ratio, excess attenuation, distortion within the sounds determined as a blur ratio, and prolongation of the sounds with “tails” of echoes determined as a tail-to-signal ratio. All four measures indicated that degradation decreased with speaker and microphone height. However, the decrease was considerably higher for the microphone than for the speaker. This suggests that choosing high perches in a forest at spring results in more benefits to blackcaps in terms of improved communication conditions when they act as receivers than as senders.

1.
Aubin
,
T.
(
1994
). “
Syntana: a software for the synthesis and analysis of animal sounds
,”
Bioacoustics
6
,
80
81
.
2.
Balsby
,
T. J. S.
, and
Dabelsteen
,
T.
(
2003
). “
Male calling between courtship sequences in whitethroats: a way to counter intrusions from neighboring rivals
,”
Behav. Processes
63
,
149
157
.
3.
Blumenrath, S. H., and Dabelsteen, T. (2004). “Degradation of great tit Parus major song before and after foliation: Implications for vocal communication in deciduous forests,” Behavior 8, 935–958.
4.
Catchpole, C. K., and Slater, P. J. B. (1995). Bird Song. Biological Themes and Variations (Cambridge U. P., Cambridge, UK).
5.
Cramp, S. (1992). The Birds of the Western Palearctic Vol. VI (Oxford U. P., Oxford).
6.
Dabelsteen
,
T.
(
1984
). “
An analysis of the full song of the Blackbird Turdus merula with respect to message coding and adaptations for acoustic communication
,”
Ornis. Scand.
15
,
227
239
.
7.
Dabelsteen
,
T.
,
and
Mathevon
,
N.
(
2002
). “
Why do songbirds sing intensively at dawn? A test of the acoustic transmission hypothesis
,”
Acta Ethologica
4
,
65
72
.
8.
Dabelsteen
,
T.
,
Pedersen
,
S. B.
, and
Larsen
,
O. N.
(
1993
). “
Habitat-induced degradation of sound signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation and signal-to-noise ratio
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2206
2220
.
9.
Dabelsteen
,
T.
,
McGregor
,
P. K.
,
Lampe
,
H. M.
,
Langmore
,
N. E.
, and
Holland
,
J.
(
1998
). “
Quiet song in songbirds: an overlooked phenomenon
,”
Bioacoustics
9
,
89
105
.
10.
Holland
,
J.
,
Dabelsteen
,
T.
,
Pedersen
,
S. B.
, and
Larsen
,
O. N.
(
1998
). “
Degradation of song in the wren Troglodytes troglodytes: Implications for information transfer and ranging
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
2154
2166
.
11.
Holland
,
J.
,
Dabelsteen
,
T.
,
Bjørn
,
C. P.
, and
Pedersen
,
S. B.
(
2001a
). “
The location of ranging cues in wren song: evidence from calibrated interactive playback experiments
,”
Behaviour
138
,
189
206
.
12.
Holland
,
J.
,
Dabelsteen
,
T.
,
Pedersen
,
S. B.
, and
Paris
,
A. L.
(
2001b
). “
Potential ranging cues contained within the energetic pauses of transmitted wren song
,”
Bioacoustics
12
,
3
20
.
13.
Kroodsma
,
D. E.
, and
Byers
,
B. E.
(
1991
). “
The function(s) of bird song
,”
Am. Zool.
31
,
318
328
.
14.
Larsen
,
O. N.
, and
Dabelsteen
,
T.
(
1997
). “
The 1 Vifa Neodymium Tweeter: a versatile speaker for playback experiments
,”
Bioacoustics
8
,
323
326
.
15.
Mathevon
,
N.
, and
Aubin
,
T.
(
1997
). “
Reaction to conspecific degraded song by the wren Troglodytes troglodytes: Territorial response and choice of song post
,”
Behav. Processes
39
,
77
84
.
16.
Mathevon
,
N.
, and
Aubin
,
T.
(
2001
). “
Sound-based species-specific recognition in the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla shows high tolerance to signal modifications
,”
Behaviour
138
,
511
524
.
17.
Mathevon
,
N.
,
Aubin
,
T.
, and
Dabelsteen
,
T.
(
1996
). “
Song degradation during propagation: importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes
,”
Ethology
102
,
397
412
.
18.
Mathevon, N., Aubin, T., Dabelsteen, T., and Vielliard, J. M. E. (2004). “Are communication activities shaped by environmental constraints in reverberating and sound-absorbing forest habitats ?” in Advances in Bioacoustics, vol. I, edited by J. M. E. Vielliard, M. L. Da Silva, and R. A. Suthers (Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro), pp. 259–263.
19.
McGregor, P. K. (1994). “Sound cues to distance: the perception of range,” in Perception and Motor Control in Birds, edited by P. R. Green and M. Davis (Springer, Berlin), pp. 74–94.
20.
Michelsen, A. (1983). “Biophysical basis of sound communication,” in Bioacoustics, a comparative approach, edited by B. Lewis (Academic, New York), pp. 3–38.
21.
Morton
,
E. S.
(
1975
). “
Ecological sources of selection of avian sounds
,”
Am. Nat.
109
,
17
34
.
22.
Nemeth
,
E.
,
Winkler
,
H.
, and
Dabelsteen
,
T.
(
2001
). “
Differential degradation of antbird songs in a Neotropical rainforest: Adaptation to perch height?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
3263
3274
.
23.
Padgham
,
M.
(
2004
). “
Reverberation and frequency attenuation in forests—implications for acoustic communication in animals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
115
,
402
410
.
24.
Pedersen, S. B. (1998). “Preliminary operation manual for signal processor SIGPRO, ver.1.3.,” Center for Sound Communication, Odense University.
25.
Wiley
,
R. H.
, and
Richards
,
D. G.
(
1978
). “
Physical constraints on acoustic communication and the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
3
,
69
94
.
26.
Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G. (1982). “Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: Sound transmission and signal detection,” in Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 1., edited by E. H. Kroodsma and D. E. Miller (Academic, New York), pp. 131–181.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.