Vowel production in gay, lesbian, bisexual (GLB), and heterosexual speakers was examined. Differences in the acoustic characteristics of vowels were found as a function of sexual orientation. Lesbian and bisexual women produced less fronted /u/ and /ɑ/ than heterosexual women. Gay men produced a more expanded vowel space than heterosexual men. However, the vowels of GLB speakers were not generally shifted toward vowel patterns typical of the opposite sex. These results are inconsistent with the conjecture that innate biological factors have a broadly feminizing influence on the speech of gay men and a broadly masculinizing influence on the speech of lesbian/bisexual women. They are consistent with the idea that innate biological factors influence GLB speech patterns indirectly by causing selective adoption of certain speech patterns characteristic of the opposite sex.

Topics
Speech communication, Acoustics, Vowel systems
1.
Avery
,
J.
, and
Liss
,
J.
(
1996
). “
Acoustic correlates of less-masculine sounding speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
,
3738
–
3748
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
2.
Bailey, J. M. (2003a). The Boy Who Would Be Queen: The Science of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism (Joseph Henry Press, Lincoln, NE).
3.
Bailey, J. M. (2003b). Gender Nonconformity and Sexual Orientation, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, 4–8 June, 2003.
4.
Boersma, P., and Weenink, D. (2003). Praat v. 4.1.7 [Computer Software], Institute of Phonetic Sciences, Amsterdam.
5.
Bradlow
,
A.
,
Torretta
,
G.
, and
Pisoni
,
D.
(
1996
). “
Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics
,”
Speech Commun.
20
,
255
–
272
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
6.
Carahaly, L. (2000). “Listener accuracy in identifying the sexual orientation of male and female speakers,” unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
7.
Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: the Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High (Blackwell, Malden, MA).
8.
Fitch
,
W. T.
, and
Giedd
,
J.
(
1999
). “
Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
1511
–
1522
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
9.
Gaudio
,
R.
(
1994
). “
Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men
,”
Am. Speech
 
69
,
30
–
57
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
Habick, T. (1991). “Burnouts versus rednecks: effects of group membership on the phonemic system,” in New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change, edited by P. Eckert (Academic Press, San Diego).
11.
IEEE (1967). Standards Publication No. 297, IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements, au-17 (3), pp. 225–246.
12.
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J., and Marchal, A., in Speech Production and Speech Modeling (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht), pp. 403–439.
13.
Lindblom
,
B.
, and
Sundburg
,
J.
(
1971
). “
Acoustical consequences of lip, tongue, jaw, and larynx movement
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
50
,
1166
–
1179
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
14.
Linville
,
S.
(
1998
). “
Acoustic correlates of perceived versus actual sexual orientation in men’s speech
,”
Pholia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
 
50
,
35
–
48
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
Mendoza-Denton, N., Hay, J., and Jannedy, S. (2003). “Probabilistic sociolinguistics: beyond variable rules,” in Probabilistic Linguistics, edited by R. Bod, J. Hay, and S. Jannedy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
16.
Moon
,
B.
, and
Lindblom
,
B.
(
1994
). “
Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
40
–
55
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
Perry
,
T. L.
,
Ohde
,
R.
, and
Ashmead
,
D.
(
2001
). “
The acoustic bases for gender identification from children’s voices
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
2988
–
2998
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
18.
Stevens, K. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
19.
Van Bezooijen
,
R.
(
1995
). “
Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women
,”
Lang Speech
38
,
253
–
265
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
20.
Waksler
,
S.
(
2001
). “
Pitch range and women’s sexual orientation
,”
Word
 
52
,
69
–
77
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
21.
Zwicker
,
E.
, and
Terhardt
,
E.
(
1980
). “
Analytical expression for critical-band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
68
,
1523
–
1525
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
22.
Zwicky, A. (1997). “Two lavender issues for linguists,” in Queerly Phrased, edited by K. Hall and A. Livia (Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 21–32.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 Acoustical Society of America.
2004
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.