Relationships between exposure to noise [metric: day-night level (DNL) or day-evening-night level (DENL)] from a single source (aircraft, road traffic, or railways) and annoyance based on a large international dataset have been published earlier. Also for stationary sources relationships have been assessed. Here the annoyance equivalents model concerning noise annoyance from combined sources and the underlying assumptions are presented. The model first translates the noise from the individual sources into the equally annoying sound levels of a reference source, road traffic, and then sums these levels giving total level L. The annoyance from the combined sources is found by substituting exposure L in the road traffic exposure-annoyance relationship. The most important assumption, independence of the contributions of the sources, is discussed. It appears that independence will be violated substantially only due to the effect of the presence or absence of a quiet side of a building, which is not incorporated in the model. For use in practice, the application of the model is broken down in five steps. The step by step procedure can be used for the assessment of the total noise level and the associated total annoyance on the basis of the DNL or DENL values of the individual sources.

1.
Aczél, J. (1987). A short course on functional equations (D. Reidel, Dordrect).
2.
Botteldooren
,
D.
, and
Verkeyn
,
A.
(
2003
). “
Fuzzy models for accumulation of reported community noise annoyance from combined sources
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
,
1496
1508
.
3.
Delta Acoustics. (1997). Objective Measurement of Audible Tones in Noise (Delta Acoustics, Copenhagen).
4.
EC/DG Environment. (2002a). Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (EC/DG Environment, Brussels).
5.
EC/DG Environment. (2002b). Position Paper on Dose Response Relationships between Transportation Noise and Annoyance (EC/DG Environment, Brussels).
6.
Fields
,
J. M.
(
1998
). “
Reactions to environmental noise in an ambient noise context in residential areas
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
2245
2260
.
7.
Holman
,
E. W.
(
1971
). “
A note on conjoint measurement
,”
J. Math. Psychol.
8
,
489
494
.
8.
ISO. (2002) “Acoustics—Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise—Part 2: Determination of environmental noise levels,” ISO/CD 1996-2 (International Standards Organization, Geneva).
9.
Job, R. F. S., and Hatfield, J. (2000). “Factors contributing to reported reaction to combined noise sources,” In: Proceedings Internoise 2000, edited by D. Cassereau (Société Française d’Acoustique Nice).
10.
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of Measurements (Academic, New York).
11.
Kryter
,
K. D.
(
1982
). “
Community annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
72
,
1222
1242
.
12.
Miedema, H. M. E. (1987). “Annoyance from combined noise sources,” In: Environmental Annoyance: Characterization, Measurement, edited by H. S. Koelega (Elsevier, Amsterdam), pp. 313–320.
13.
Miedema, H. M. E. (1996). “Quantification of annoyance caused by environmental noise and odour,” PhD thesis (TNO-PG, Leiden).
14.
Miedema
,
H. M. E.
, and
Vos
,
H.
(
1998
). “
Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
3432
3445
.
15.
Miedema
,
H. M. E.
, and
Oudshoorn
,
C. G. M.
(
2001
). “
Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals
,”
Environ. Health Perspect.
109
,
409
416
.
16.
Miedema
,
H. M. E.
, and
Vos
,
H.
(
2004
). “
Noise annoyance from stationary sources: Relationships with exposure metric DENL and their confidence intervals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
116
,
334
343
.
17.
Narens, L. (1985). Abstract Measurement Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
18.
Rice
,
C. G.
, and
Izumi
,
K.
(
1986
). “
Factors affecting the annoyance of combinations of noise sources
,”
Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics
8
,
325
332
.
19.
Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Weber, R., Ronnebaum, T., and Dönnges, T. (1996) Literaturstudie zur Gesamtgeräuschbewertung (Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg).
20.
Schultz
,
T. J.
(
1978
). “
Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
,
377
405
.
21.
Taylor
,
S. M.
(
1982
). “
A comparison of models to predict annoyance reactions to noise from mixed sources
,”
J. Sound Vib.
81
,
123
138
.
22.
Vos
,
J.
(
1992
). “
Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road traffic, and aircraft sounds: A quantitative model
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
3330
3345
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.