In a laboratory study, the annoyance caused by the passby sounds from a magnetic levitation (maglev) train was investigated. The listeners were presented with various sound fragments. The task of the listeners was to respond after each presentation to the question: “How annoying would you find the sound in the preceding period if you were exposed to it at home on a regular basis?” The independent variables were (a) the driving speed of the maglev train (varying from 100 to 400 km/h), (b) the outdoor A-weighted sound exposure level (ASEL) of the passbys (varying from 65 to 90 dB), and (c) the simulated outdoor-to-indoor reduction in sound level (windows open or windows closed). As references to the passby sounds from the maglev train (type Transrapid 08), sounds from road traffic (passenger cars and trucks) and more conventional railway (intercity trains) were included for rating also. Four important results were obtained. Provided that the outdoor ASELs were the same, (1) the annoyance was independent of the driving speed of the maglev train, (2) the annoyance caused by the maglev train was considerably higher than that caused by the intercity train, (3) the annoyance caused by the maglev train was hardly different from that caused by road traffic, and (4) the results (1)–(3) held true both for open or closed windows. On the basis of the present results, it might be expected that the sounds are equally annoying if the ASELs of the maglev-train passbys are at least 5 dB lower than those of the intercity train passbys. Consequently, the results of the present experiment do not support application of a railway bonus to the maglev-train sounds.

Topics
Land transportation, Magnetic levitation devices
1.
de Graaff, E., Holties, H., Kurze, U. J., Martner, O., Meißner, F. H., and Nürnberger, H. (2001). Acoustical research on maglev train for the Zuiderzeelijn, Report No. 50694/2, M+P Raadgevende Ingenieurs, Den Bosch, The Netherlands, and Müller-BBM, Planegg, Germany.
2.
Fastl, H., and Gottschling, G. (1996). “Subjective evaluation of noise immissions from Transrapid,” in Proceedings Internoise 1996 (Liverpool, UK), Vol. 4, pp. 2109–2114.
3.
Fields
,
J. M.
(
1993
). “
Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2753
–
2763
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
4.
Fields
,
J. M.
, and
Walker
,
J. G.
(
1982
). “
Comparing the relationships between noise level and annoyance in different surveys: a railway vs. aircraft and road traffic comparison
,”
J. Sound Vib.
81
,
51
–
80
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
Gottschling, G., and Fastl, H. (1997). “Akustische Simulation von 6-Sektionen-Fahrzeugen des Transrapid,” [Acoustical simulation of 6-section-vehicles of the Transrapid] in Fortschritte der Akustik-DAGA 1997 (Bad Honnef, Germany), DPG-GmbH, pp. 254–255.
6.
Heimerl
,
G.
, and
Holzmann
,
E.
(
1979
). “
Ermittlung der Belästigung durch Verkehrslärm in Abhängigkeit von Verkehrsmittel und Verkehrsdichte in einem Ballungsgebiet (Straßen- und Eisenbahnverkehr),” [Determination of the annoyance caused by traffic noise as a function of transportation system and traffic density in the area of population concentration (road and railroad traffic)
]
Kampf dem Lärm
26
,
64
–
69
.
Google Scholar
 
7.
Knall
,
V.
, and
Schümer
,
R.
(
1983
). “
The differing annoyance levels of rail and road traffic noise
,”
J. Sound Vib.
87
,
321
–
326
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
8.
Miedema
,
H. M. E.
, and
Oudshoorn
,
C. G. M.
(
2001
). “
Annoyance fromtransportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals
,”
Environ. Health Perspect.
109
(
4
),
409
–
416
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
9.
Miedema
,
H. M. E.
, and
Vos
,
H.
(
1999
). “
Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
3336
–
3344
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
10.
Neugebauer, D., and Ortscheid, J. (1997). “Geräuschbewertung des Transrapid,” [Noise evaluation of the Transrapid] in Fortschritte der Akustik-DAGA 1997 (Bad Honnef, Germany), DPG-GmbH, pp. 403–404.
11.
Quehl
,
J.
(
1999
). “
Schienenbonus für Transrapid?—Eine semantische Klanguntersuchung zur Uebertragbarkeit des Schienenbonus auf die Magnetschnellbahn,” [Railway bonus for Transrapid—A semantic investigation of timbre regarding the application of the railway bonus to the maglev
]
Z. Lärmbekämpfung
46
(
5
),
163
–
174
.
Google Scholar
 
12.
Schümer-Kohrs
,
A.
,
Schümer
,
R.
,
Knall
,
V.
, and
Kasubek
,
W.
(
1981
). “
Vergleich der Lästigkeit von Schienen- und Straßenverkehrslärm in städtischen und ländlichen Regionen,” [Comparison of annoyance by railway and road traffic noise in urban and rural areas
]
Z. Lärmbekämpfung
28
,
123
–
130
.
Google Scholar
 
13.
Versfeld
,
N. J.
, and
Vos
,
J.
(
1997
). “
Annoyance caused by sounds of wheeled and tracked vehicles
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
(
5
), Part 1
2677
–
2685
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
14.
Versfeld
,
N. J.
, and
Vos
,
J.
(
2002
). “
A-weighted equivalent sound level as a predictor of the annoyance caused by road traffic consisting of various proportions of light and heavy vehicles
,”
J. Sound Vib.
253
(
2
),
389
–
399
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
Vos, J. (1992a). “Noise annoyance around irregularly employed shooting ranges: the expected effect of various training schedules,” in Proceedings of the 6th International FASE Congress 1992 (Swiss Acoustical Society, Zürich, Switzerland), pp. 355–358.
16.
Vos
,
J.
(
1992b
). “
Annoyance caused by low frequency sounds from artillery fire: the expected effect of various training schedules
,”
J. Low Freq. Noise Vib.
11
(
2
),
47
–
51
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
17.
Vos, J. (1995). “A review of research on the annoyance caused by impulse sounds produced by small firearms,” in Proceedings Internoise 1995, Newport Beach, CA, Vol. 2, pp. 875–878.
18.
Vos
,
J.
(
2001
). “
On the annoyance caused by impulse sounds produced by small, medium-large, and large firearms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
244
–
253
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
19.
Vos
,
J.
(
2003
). “
A- and C-weighted sound levels as predictors of the annoyance caused by shooting sounds, for various facade attenuation types
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
336
–
347
.
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
20.
Vos, J., and Geurtsen, F. W. M. (1992). Geluidhinder rond onregelmatig gebruikte schietbanen: een studie naar het verwachte effect van verschillende tijdschema’s [Noise annoyance around irregularly employed shooting ranges: the expected effect of various training schedules], Report IZF 1992 A-13, TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
21.
Vos, J., and Geurtsen, F. W. M. (1995). Geluidhinder rond onregelmatig gebruikte schietbanen: een vervolgstudie naar het verwachte effect van concentratie van schietactiviteiten op de hinder [Noise annoyance around irregularly employed shooting ranges: a further study on the expected effect of concentration of training activities on annoyance], Report TNO-TM 1995 A-44, TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 Acoustical Society of America.
2004
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.