Three experiments tested listeners’ ability to identify 70 diverse environmental sounds using limited spectral information. Experiment 1 employed low- and high-pass filtered sounds with filter cutoffs ranging from 300 to 8000 Hz. Listeners were quite good (>50% correct) at identifying the sounds even when severely filtered; for the high-pass filters, performance was never below 70%. Experiment 2 used octave-wide bandpass filtered sounds with center frequencies from 212 to 6788 Hz and found that performance with the higher bandpass filters was from 70%–80% correct, whereas with the lower filters listeners achieved 30%–50% correct. To examine the contribution of temporal factors, in experiment 3 vocoder methods were used to create event-modulated noises (EMN) which had extremely limited spectral information. About half of the 70 EMN were identifiable on the basis of the temporal patterning. Multiple regression analysis suggested that some acoustic features listeners may use to identify EMN include envelope shape, periodicity, and the consistency of temporal changes across frequency channels. Identification performance with high- and low-pass filtered environmental sounds varied in a manner similar to that of speech sounds, except that there seemed to be somewhat more information in the higher frequencies for the environmental sounds used in this experiment.

1.
Attias, H., and Schreiner, C. E. (1997). “Temporal low-order statistics of natural sounds,” in Advances in Neural Info Processing Systems, edited by M. Mozer (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), Vol. 9, pp. 27–33.
2.
Ballas
,
J. A.
(
1993
). “
Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
19
(
2
),
250
267
.
3.
Ballas
,
J. A.
, and
Howard
,
J. H.
(
1987
). “
Interpreting the language of environmental sounds
,”
Environ. Behav.
19
(
1
),
91
114
.
4.
Ballas
,
J. A.
, and
Mullins
,
T.
(
1991
). “
Effects of context on the identification of everyday sounds
,”
Hum. Perform.
4
(
3
),
199
219
.
5.
Bell
,
T. S.
,
Dirks
,
D. D.
, and
Trine
,
T. D.
(
1992
). “
Frequency-importance functions for words in high- and low-context sentences
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
35
,
950
959
.
6.
Cabe
,
P. A.
, and
Pittenger
,
J. B.
(
2000
). “
Human sensitivity to acoustic information from vessel filling
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
26
(
1
),
313
324
.
7.
Carello
,
C.
,
Anderson
,
K. L.
, and
Kunkler-Peck
,
A. J.
(
1998
). “
Perception of object length by sound
,”
Psychol. Sci.
9
(
3
),
211
214
.
8.
Carrat
,
R.
(
1984
). “
Analysis and synthesis of speech regarding cochlear implant
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol., Suppl.
411
,
85
94
.
9.
Compton
,
A. J.
(
1963
). “
Effects of filtering and vocal duration on the identification of speakers, aurally
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
35
(
11
),
1748
1752
.
10.
Dudley
,
H.
(
1940
). “
Remaking speech
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
11
,
169
177
.
11.
Dudley
,
H.
(
1958
). “
Phonetic pattern recognition vocoder for narrow-band speech transmission
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
30
,
733
739
.
12.
Eremenko
,
Y. I.
, and
Ermakov
,
V. P.
(
1985
). “
Theoretical aspects of the construction of reading devices for the blind using vocoder techniques
,”
Defektologiya
1
,
81
86
.
13.
Freed
,
D.
(
1990
). “
Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive sound events
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
(
1
),
311
322
.
14.
French
,
N. R.
, and
Steinberg
,
J. C.
(
1947
). “
Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
19
,
90
119
.
15.
Gaver
,
W. W.
(
1993a
). “
What in the world do we hear?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception
,”
Ecological Psychol.
5
,
1
29
.
16.
Gaver
,
W. W.
(
1993b
). “
How do we hear in the world?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception
,”
Ecological Psychol.
5
,
285
313
.
17.
Halpern
,
D.
,
Blake
,
R.
, and
Hillenbrand
,
B.
(
1986
). “
Psychoacoustics of a chilling sound
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
39
(
2
),
77
80
.
18.
Kunkler-Peck
,
A. J.
, and
Turvey
,
M. T.
(
2000
). “
Hearing shape
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
26
(
1
),
279
294
.
19.
Lakatos
,
S.
,
McAdams
,
S.
, and
Caussé
,
R.
(
1997
). “
The representation of auditory source characteristics: Simple geometric form
,”
Percept. Psychophys.
59
(
8
),
1180
1190
.
20.
Lass
,
N. J.
,
Eastman
,
S. K.
,
Parrish
,
W. C.
,
Scherbick
,
K. A.
, and
Ralph
,
D.
(
1982
). “
Listeners’ identification of environmental sounds
,”
Percept. Mot. Skills
55
,
75
78
.
21.
Lewicki
,
M. S.
(
2002
). “
Efficient coding of natural sounds
,”
Nat. Neurosci.
5
(
4
),
356
363
.
22.
Li
,
X.
,
Logan
,
R.
, and
Pastore
,
R.
(
1991
). “
Perception of acoustic source characteristics: Walking sounds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
(
6
),
3036
3049
.
23.
Ludvigsen
,
C.
(
1992
). “
Comparison of certain measures of speech and noise level
,”
Scand. Audiol.
21
,
23
29
.
24.
Lutfi
,
R. A.
, and
Oh
,
E.
(
1997
). “
Auditory discrimination of material changes in a struck clamped bar
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
102
(
6
),
3647
3656
.
25.
Lutfi
,
R. A.
(
2001
). “
Auditory detection of hollowness
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
(
2
),
1010
1019
.
26.
Repp
,
B.
(
1987
). “
The sound of two hands clapping: An exploratory study
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
1100
1109
.
27.
Shannon
,
R. V.
,
Zeng
,
F. G.
,
Wygonski
,
J.
,
Kamath
,
V.
, and
Ekelid
,
M.
(
1995
). “
Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues
,”
Science
270
,
303
304
.
28.
Shannon
,
R. V.
,
Zeng
,
F. G.
, and
Wygonski
,
J.
(
1998
). “
Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
(
4
),
2467
2476
.
29.
Slaney, M. (1995). “Auditory Toolbox: A MATLAB toolbox for auditory modeling work,” Apple Computer Technical Report #45.
30.
Studebaker
,
G. A.
,
Pavlovic
,
C. V.
, and
Sherbecoe
,
R. L.
(
1987
). “
A frequency importance function for continuous discourse
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
81
,
1130
1138
.
31.
Vanderveer, N. J. (1979). “Ecological acoustics: Human perception of environmental sounds,” Dissertation Abstracts International 40: 4543B (University Microfilms No. 8004002).
32.
Warren
,
W. H.
, and
Verbrugge
,
R. R.
(
1984
). “
Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: A case study in ecological acoustics
,”
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
10
,
704
712
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.