Rates of reverberative decay and frequency attenuation are measured within two Australian forests. In particular, their dependence on the distance between a source and receiver, and the relative heights of both, is examined. Distance is always the most influential of these factors. The structurally denser of the forests exhibits much slower reverberative decay, although the frequency dependence of reverberation is qualitatively similar in the two forests. There exists a central range of frequencies between 1 and 3 kHz within which reverberation varies relatively little with distance. Attenuation is much greater within the structurally denser forest, and in both forests it generally increases with increasing frequency and distance, although patterns of variation differ between the two forests. Increasing the source height generally reduces reverberation, while increasing the receiver height generally reduces attenuation. These findings have considerable implications for acoustic communication between inhabitants of these forests, particularly for the perching behaviors of birds. Furthermore, this work indicates the ease with which the general acoustic properties of forests can be measured and compared.

1.
Aylor
,
D.
(
1972
). “
Sound transmission through vegetation in relation to leaf area density, leaf width, and breadth of canopy
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
51
,
411
414
.
2.
Badyaev
,
A. V.
, and
Leaf
,
E. S.
(
1997
). “
Habitat associations of song characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais warblers
,”
Auk
114
,
40
46
.
3.
Chappius
,
C.
(
1971
). “Un example de l’influence du milieu sur les emissions vocales des oiseax: L’evolution des chants en foret equatoriale,” (An example of the influence of the environment of the vocalizations of birds: The evolution of songs in equatorial forests.)
Terre Vie
25
,
183
202
.
4.
Dabelsteen
,
T.
,
Larson
,
O. N.
, and
Pedersen
,
S. B.
(
1993
). “
Habitat-induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects on communication sounds and bird location of blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
2206
2220
.
5.
Holland
,
J.
,
Dabelsteen
,
T.
, and
Pedersen
,
S. B.
(
1998
). “
Degradation of wren troglodytes troglodytes song—implications for information transfer and ranging
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
2154
2166
.
6.
Huisman
,
W. T.
, and
Attenborough
,
K.
(
1991
). “
Reverberation and attenuation in a pine forest
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
2664
2677
.
7.
Hunter
,
M. L.
(
1980
). “
Microhabitat selection for singing and other behaviour in great tits, Parus major: Some visual and acoustical considerations
,”
Anim. Behav.
28
,
468
475
.
8.
Kuttruff
,
H.
(
1967
). “Uber Nachhall in Medien mit unregelmassig verteilten Streuzentren, insbesondere in Hallraumen mit aufgehangten Streuelementen,” (On reverberation in media with irregularly distributed scattering centers, in particular rooms with suspended scattering elements)
Acustica
18
,
131
143
.
9.
Kuttruff, H. (2000). Room Acoustics, 4th ed. (Spon, London).
10.
Lemon
,
R. E.
,
Struger
,
J.
, and
Lechowicz
,
M. J.
(
1981
). “
Song features and singing heights of American warblers: Maximization or optimization of distance?
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
69
,
1169
1176
.
11.
Martens
,
M. J. M.
(
1980
). “
Foliage as a low pass filter: Experiments with model forests in an anechoic chamber
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
,
66
72
.
12.
Martens
,
M. J. M.
, and
Michelsen
,
A.
(
1981
). “
Absorption of acoustic energy by plant leaves
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
69
,
303
306
.
13.
Mathevon
,
N.
(
1998
). “
Degraded temporal sound features as a function of distance and potential as cues for ranging in birds
,”
Bioacoustics
9
,
17
33
.
14.
Mathevon
,
N.
,
Aubin
,
T.
, and
Dabelsteen
,
T.
(
1996
). “
Song degradation during propagation—Importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes
,”
Ethnology
102
,
397
412
.
15.
McGregor
,
P. K.
, and
Krebs
,
J. R.
(
1984
). “
Sound degradation as a distance cue in great tit (Parus major) song
,”
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
16
,
49
56
.
16.
Morton
,
E. S.
(
1975
). “
Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds
,”
Am. Nat.
109
,
17
34
.
17.
Morton
,
E. S.
(
1986
). “
Predictions from the ranging hypothesis for the evolution of long-distance signals in birds
,”
Behaviour
99
,
65
86
.
18.
Naguib
,
M.
(
1995
). “
Auditory distance assessment of singing conspecifics in Carolina wrens—The role of reverberation and frequency-dependent attenuation
,”
Anim. Behav.
50
,
1297
1307
.
19.
Naguib
,
M.
(
2003
). “
Reverberation of rapid and slow trills: Implications for signal adaptations to long-range communication
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
1749
1756
.
20.
Polack
,
J. D.
(
1992
). “
Modifying chambers to play billiards: The foundations of reverberation theory
,”
Acustica
76
,
257
272
.
21.
Price
,
M. A.
,
Attenborough
,
K.
, and
Heap
,
N. W.
(
1988
). “
Sound attenuation through trees: Measurements and models
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
,
1836
1844
.
22.
Richards
,
D. G.
, and
Wiley
,
R. H.
(
1980
). “
Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: Implications for animal communication
,”
Am. Nat.
115
,
381
399
.
23.
Schroeder
,
M. R.
(
1965
). “
New method of measuring reverberation time
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
37
,
409
412
.
24.
Wiley
,
R. H.
(
1991
). “
Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America
,”
Am. Nat.
138
,
973
993
.
25.
Wiley
,
R. H.
, and
Godard
,
R.
(
1996
). “
Ranging of conspecific songs by Kentucky warblers and its implications for interactions of territorial males
,”
Behaviour
133
,
81
102
.
26.
Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G. (1982). “Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: Sound transmission and signal detection,” in Acoustic Communication in Birds 1, edited by D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (Academic, New York), pp. 132–182.
27.
Xiang
,
N.
(
1995
). “
Evaluation of reverberation times using a nonlinear regression approach
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
98
,
2112
2121
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.