Auditory neurobiology has benefited significantly from ethological approaches using acoustic communication signals. Developing an ethological model in a genetically manipulable system such as the mouse would enhance the ability to investigate the processing, learning, and recognition of sounds. Characterizing the basic acoustic structure of mouse vocalizations would help lay a foundation for such a future study. Towards this goal, ultrasound vocalizations emitted by isolated mouse pups and pairs of adult males and females have been digitally recorded and examined. Previous work suggests that these calls may have communicative significance. An analysis of the natural variability in their spectral content, median frequency, duration, and repetition period reveals acoustic structure that could be used for recognizing the calls. Other parameters, like the rate of frequency modulation, may also be informative, but have not been examined. Pup isolation calls develop systematically between postnatal day 5 and 12 towards a more stereotyped vocalization—contracting from a wide range of values into narrower clusters of frequency and duration, and shifting from longer to shorter repetition periods. Most significantly, pup isolation and adult encounter calls fall into two distinct spectral and temporal categories, making it possible for a receiver to acoustically distinguish between them, and to potentially categorically perceive them along those dimensions.

1.
Alford
,
B. R.
, and
Ruben
,
R. J.
(
1963
). “
Physiological, behavioral and anatomical correlates of the development of hearing in the mouse
,”
Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.
72
,
237
247
.
2.
Beck
,
J. A.
,
Lloyd
,
S.
,
Hafezparast
,
M.
,
Lennon-Pierce
,
M.
,
Eppig
,
J. T.
,
Festing
,
M. F.
, and
Fisher
,
E. M.
(
2000
). “
Genealogies of mouse inbred strains
,”
Nat. Genet.
24
(
1
),
5
,
23
.
3.
Beeman, K. (1998). “Digital signal analysis, editing and synthesis,” in Animal Acoustic Communication, edited by S. L. Hopp, M. J. Owren, and C. S. Evans (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 59–103.
4.
Bell
,
R. W.
,
Nitschke
,
W.
, and
Zachman
,
T. A.
(
1972
). “
Ultra-sounds in three inbred strains of young mice
,”
Behav. Biol.
7
(
6
),
805
814
.
5.
Blumberg
,
M. S.
,
Sokoloff
,
G.
, and
Kent
,
K. J.
(
2000
). “
A developmental analysis of clonidine’s effects on cardiac rate and ultrasound production in infant rats
,”
Dev. Psychobiol.
36
(
3
),
186
193
.
6.
Boll
,
S. F.
(
1979
). “
Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction
,”
IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process.
ASSP-27
(
2
),
113
120
.
7.
Branchi
,
I.
,
Santucci
,
D.
,
Vitale
,
A.
, and
Alleva
,
E.
(
1998
). “
Ultrasonic vocalizations by infant laboratory mice: a preliminary spectrographic characterization under different conditions
,”
Dev. Psychobiol.
33
(
3
),
249
256
.
8.
Brand
,
A.
,
Urban
,
R.
, and
Grothe
,
B.
(
2000
). “
Duration tuning in the mouse auditory midbrain
,”
J. Neurophysiol.
84
(
4
),
1790
1799
.
9.
Brown
,
A. M.
(
1973
). “
High frequency peaks in the cochlear microphonic response of rodents
,”
J. Comp. Physiol.
83
,
377
392
.
10.
D’Amato
,
F. R.
, and
Moles
,
A.
(
2001
). “
Ultrasonic vocalizations as an index of social memory in female mice
,”
Behav. Neurosci.
115
(
4
),
834
840
.
11.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman and Hall, New York).
12.
Egorova
,
M. A.
,
Vartanyan
,
I. A.
, and
Ehret
,
G.
(
2002
). “
Neural critical bands and inhibition in the auditory midbrain of the house mouse (mus domesticus)
,”
Dokl. Biol. Sci.
382
,
5
7
.
13.
Ehret
,
G.
(
1975
). “
Masked auditory thresholds, critical ratios, and scales of the basilar membrane of the housemouse (mus musculus)
,”
J. Comp. Physiol.
103
,
329
341
.
14.
Ehret
,
G.
(
1976
). “
Development of absolute auditory thresholds in the house mouse (mus musculus)
,”
J. Am. Audiol Soc.
1
(
5
),
179
184
.
15.
Ehret, G. (1983). “Auditory processing and perception of ultrasounds in house mice,” in Advances in Vertebrate Neuroethology, edited by J-P. Ewert, R. R. Capranica, and D. J. Ingle, NATO advanced science institutes series. Series A, Life Sciences (Plenum, New York), 56th ed.
16.
Ehret
,
G.
(
1992
). “
Categorical perception of mouse-pup ultrasounds in the temporal domain
,”
Anim. Behav.
43
(
3
),
409
416
.
17.
Ehret
,
G.
, and
Haack
,
B.
(
1981
). “
Categorical perception of mouse pup ultrasound by lactating females
,”
Naturwissenschaften
68
(
4
),
208
209
.
18.
Ehret
,
G.
, and
Haack
,
B.
(
1982
). “
Ultrasound recognition in house mice: key-stimulus configuration and recognition mechanism
,”
J. Comp. Physiol., A
148
(
2
),
245
251
.
19.
Elwood
,
R. W.
, and
Keeling
,
F.
(
1982
). “
Temporal organization of ultrasonic vocalizations in infant mice
,”
Dev. Psychobiol.
15
(
3
),
221
227
.
20.
Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. (1988). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Penninsula, Los Altos, CA).
21.
Haack, B., Markl, H., and Ehret, G. (1983). “Sound communication between parents and offspring,” in The Auditory Psychobiology of the Mouse, edited by J. F. Willott (Thomas, Springfield, IL), pp. 57–97.
22.
Hahn
,
M. E.
,
Hewitt
,
J. K.
,
Adams
,
M.
, and
Tully
,
T.
(
1987
). “
Genetic influences on ultrasonic vocalizations in young mice
,”
Behav. Genet.
17
(
2
),
155
166
.
23.
Hahn
,
M. E.
,
Karkowski
,
L.
,
Weinreb
,
L.
,
Henry
,
A.
,
Schanz
,
N.
, and
Hahn
,
E. M.
(
1998
). “
Genetic and developmental influences on infant mouse ultrasonic calling. II. Developmental patterns in the calls of mice 2-12 days of age
,”
Behav. Genet.
28
(
4
),
315
325
.
24.
Harnad, S. R. (1987). Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition (Cambridge U.P., New York).
25.
Hauser, M. D. (1996). The Evolution of Communication (MIT, Cambridge, MA).
26.
Hurst
,
J. L.
,
Payne
,
C. E.
,
Nevison
,
C. M.
,
Marie
,
A. D.
,
Humphries
,
R. E.
,
Robertson
,
D. H.
,
Cavaggioni
,
A.
, and
Beynon
,
R. J.
(
2001
). “
Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins
,”
Nature (London)
414
(
6864
),
631
634
.
27.
Lewicki
,
M. S.
(
2002
). “
Efficient coding of natural sounds
,”
Nat. Neurosci.
5
(
4
),
356
363
.
28.
Mikaelian
,
D.
, and
Ruben
,
R. J.
(
1964
). “
Development of hearing in the normal CBA-J mouse
,”
Acta Oto-Laryngol.
59
,
451
461
.
29.
Moore, B. C. J. (1997). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 4th ed. (Academic, San Diego).
30.
Motomura
,
N.
,
Shimizu
,
K.
,
Shimizu
,
M.
,
Aoki-Komori
,
S.
,
Taniguchi
,
K.
,
Serizawa
,
I.
, and
Saito
,
T. R.
(
2002
). “
A comparative study of isolation-induced ultrasonic vocalization in rodent pups
,”
Exp. Anim.
51
(
2
),
187
190
.
31.
Noirot
,
E.
, and
Pye
,
D.
(
1969
). “
Sound analysis of ultrasonic distress calls of mouse pups as a function of their age
,”
Anim. Behav.
17
,
340
349
.
32.
Nunez
,
A. A.
,
Pomerantz
,
S. M.
,
Bean
,
N. J.
, and
Youngstrom
,
T. G.
(
1985
). “
Effects of laryngeal denervation on ultrasound production and male sexual behavior in rodents
,”
Physiol. Behav.
34
(
6
),
901
905
.
33.
Nyby, J. G. (2001). “Auditory communication among adults,” in Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology, edited by J. F. Willott (CRC, New York), pp. 3–18.
34.
Okon
,
E. E.
(
1970
). “
The effect of environmental temperature on the production of ultrasound by isolated, non-handled, albino mouse pups
,”
J. Zool., London
162
,
71
83
.
35.
Ostermeyer
,
M. C.
, and
Elwood
,
R. W.
(
1983
). “
Pup recognition in mus musculus: parental discrimination between their own and alien young
,”
Dev. Psychobiol.
16
(
2
),
75
82
.
36.
Pomerantz
,
S. M.
,
Nunez
,
A. A.
, and
Bean
,
N. J.
(
1983
). “
Female behavior is affected by male ultrasonic vocalizations in house mice
,”
Physiol. Behav.
31
(
1
),
91
96
.
37.
Ralls
,
K.
(
1967
). “
Auditory sensitivity in mice, peromyscus and mus musculus
,”
Anim. Behav.
15
(
1
),
123
128
.
38.
Roberts
,
L. H.
(
1975
). “
The rodent ultrasound production mechanism
,”
Ultrasonics
13
(
2
),
83
88
.
39.
Roubertoux
,
P. L.
,
Martin
,
B.
,
Le Roy
,
I.
,
Beau
,
J.
,
Marchaland
,
C.
,
Perez-Diaz
,
F.
,
Cohen-Salmon
,
C.
, and
Carlier
,
M.
(
1996
). “
Vocalizations in newborn mice: genetic analysis
,”
Behav. Genet.
26
(
4
),
427
437
.
40.
Sales
,
G. D.
, and
Smith
,
J. C.
(
1978
). “
Comparative studies of the ultrasonic calls of infant murid rodents
,”
Dev. Psychobiol.
11
(
6
),
595
619
.
41.
Sewell
,
G. D.
(
1970
). “
Ultrasonic communication in rodents
,”
Nature (London)
227
(
256
),
410
.
42.
Shnerson, A., and Pujol, R. (1983). “Development: anatomy, electrophysiology and behavior,” in The Auditory Psychobiology of the Mouse, edited by J. F. Willott (Thomas, Springfield, IL), pp. 395–425.
43.
Smith
,
J. C.
(
1976
). “
Responses of adult mice to models of infant calls
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.
90
(
12
),
1105
1115
.
44.
Smith, J. C., and Sales, G. D. (1980). “Ultrasonic behavior and mother-infant interactions in rodents,” in Maternal Influences and Early Behavior, edited by R. W. Bell and W. P. Smotherman (SP Medical and Scientific Books, New York), pp. 105–133.
45.
Vartanyan
,
I. A.
,
Egorova
,
M. A.
, and
Ehret
,
G.
(
2000
). “
Critical bandwidths of different types of neurons in the mouse auditory midbrain
,”
Dokl. Biol. Sci.
373
(
1-6
),
364
366
.
46.
Warburton
,
V. L.
,
Sales
,
G. D.
, and
Milligan
,
S. R.
(
1989
). “
The emission and elicitation of mouse ultrasonic vocalizations: the effects of age, sex and gonadal status
,”
Physiol. Behav.
45
(
1
),
41
47
.
47.
Whitney
,
G.
,
Coble
,
J. R.
,
Stockton
,
M. D.
, and
Tilson
,
E. F.
(
1973
). “
Ultrasonic emissions: do they facilitate courtship of mice
,”
J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.
84
(
3
),
445
452
.
48.
Willott, J. F. (editor) (2001). Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology (CRC, New York).
49.
Zheng
,
Q. Y.
,
Johnson
,
K. R.
, and
Erway
,
L. C.
(
1999
). “
Assessment of hearing in 80 inbred strains of mice by ABR threshold analyses
,”
Hear. Res.
130
(
1-2
),
94
107
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.