Auditory neurobiology has benefited significantly from ethological approaches using acoustic communication signals. Developing an ethological model in a genetically manipulable system such as the mouse would enhance the ability to investigate the processing, learning, and recognition of sounds. Characterizing the basic acoustic structure of mouse vocalizations would help lay a foundation for such a future study. Towards this goal, ultrasound vocalizations emitted by isolated mouse pups and pairs of adult males and females have been digitally recorded and examined. Previous work suggests that these calls may have communicative significance. An analysis of the natural variability in their spectral content, median frequency, duration, and repetition period reveals acoustic structure that could be used for recognizing the calls. Other parameters, like the rate of frequency modulation, may also be informative, but have not been examined. Pup isolation calls develop systematically between postnatal day 5 and 12 towards a more stereotyped vocalization—contracting from a wide range of values into narrower clusters of frequency and duration, and shifting from longer to shorter repetition periods. Most significantly, pup isolation and adult encounter calls fall into two distinct spectral and temporal categories, making it possible for a receiver to acoustically distinguish between them, and to potentially categorically perceive them along those dimensions.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
December 2003
December 02 2003
Acoustic variability and distinguishability among mouse ultrasound vocalizations Available to Purchase
Robert C. Liu;
Robert C. Liu
Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, Box 0444, University of California at San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth D. Miller;
Kenneth D. Miller
Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, Box 0444, University of California at San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael M. Merzenich;
Michael M. Merzenich
Department of Otolaryngology, Box 0732, University of California at San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143
Search for other works by this author on:
Christoph E. Schreiner
Christoph E. Schreiner
Department of Otolaryngology, Box 0732, University of California at San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert C. Liu
Kenneth D. Miller
Michael M. Merzenich
Christoph E. Schreiner
Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Department of Physiology, Box 0444, University of California at San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 3412–3422 (2003)
Article history
Received:
February 21 2003
Accepted:
September 15 2003
Citation
Robert C. Liu, Kenneth D. Miller, Michael M. Merzenich, Christoph E. Schreiner; Acoustic variability and distinguishability among mouse ultrasound vocalizations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 December 2003; 114 (6): 3412–3422. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1623787
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Focality of sound source placement by higher (ninth) order ambisonics and perceptual effects of spectral reproduction errors
Nima Zargarnezhad, Bruno Mesquita, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Variation in global and intonational pitch settings among black and white speakers of Southern American English
Aini Li, Ruaridh Purse, et al.
Related Content
Eyebrow movements and vocal pitch height: Evidence consistent with an ethological signal
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (May 2013)
Combining whistle acoustic parameters to discriminate Mediterranean odontocetes during passive acoustic monitoring
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (January 2014)
The acoustic origin of the smile
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (August 2005)
Bats use predictive strategies to track moving auditory objects
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2021)
Neural and cognitive mechanisms for vocal communication
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2022)