A new paradigm for processing sound signals for multiple-electrode cochlear implants is introduced, and results are presented from an initial psychophysical evaluation of its effect on the perceived loudness of complex sounds. A real-time processing scheme based on this paradigm, called SpeL, has been developed primarily to improve control of loudness for implant users. SpeL differs from previous schemes in several ways. Most importantly, it incorporates a published numerical model which predicts the loudness perceived by implant users for complex patterns of pulsatile electric stimulation as a function of the pulses’ physical parameters. This model is controlled by the output of a corresponding model that estimates the loudness perceived by normally hearing listeners for complex sounds. The latter model produces an estimate of the specific loudness arising from an acoustic signal. In SpeL, the specific loudness function, which describes the contribution to total loudness of each of a number of frequency bands (or cochlear positions), is converted to a pattern of electric stimulation on an appropriate set of electrodes. By application of the loudness model for electric stimulation, this pattern is designed to produce a specific loudness function for the implant user which approximates that produced by the normal-hearing model for the same input signal. The results of loudness magnitude estimation experiments with five users of the SpeL scheme confirmed that the psychophysical functions relating overall loudness perceived to input sound level for five complex acoustic signals were, on average, very similar to those for normal hearing.

1.
Byrne
,
D.
, and
Dillon
,
H.
(
1986
). “
The National Acoustic Laboratories’ (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid
,”
Ear Hear.
7
,
257
265
.
2.
Carhart
,
R.
, and
Jerger
,
J. F.
(
1959
). “
Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds
,”
J. Speech Hear Disord.
24
,
330
345
.
3.
Crochiere, R. E., and Rabiner, L. R. (1983). Multirate Digital Signal Processing (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
4.
Dillon, H. (2001). Hearing Aids (Boomerang, Sydney).
5.
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(
1990
). “
Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data
,”
Hear. Res.
47
,
103
138
.
6.
Harris
,
F. J.
(
1978
). “
On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform
,”
Proc. IEEE
66
,
51
83
.
7.
International Standards Organization (ISO) (1996). Acoustics—Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 7: Reference threshold of hearing under free-field and diffuse-field listening conditions, Standard 389-7 (ISO, Geneva).
8.
Launer
,
S.
, and
Moore
,
B. C. J.
(2003). “Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. V. On-line gain control in a digital hearing aid,” Int. J. Audiol. 42, 262–273.
9.
McDermott
,
H. J.
,
Henshall
,
K. R.
, and
McKay
,
C. M.
(
2002
). “
Benefits of syllabic input compression for users of cochlear implants
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
13
,
14
24
.
10.
McKay
,
C. M.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
1998
). “
Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: The effect of interpulse intervals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
1061
1074
.
11.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
Henshall
,
K. R.
,
Farrell
,
R. J.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
2003
). “
A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
113
,
2054
2063
.
12.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
McDermott
,
H. J.
, and
Clark
,
G. M.
(
1995
). “
Loudness summation for two channels of stimulation in cochlear implants: Effects of spatial and temporal separation
,”
Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl.
166
,
230
233
.
13.
McKay
,
C. M.
,
Remine
,
M. D.
, and
McDermott
,
H. J.
(
2001
). “
Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
1514
1524
.
14.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1987
). “
Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns
,”
Hear. Res.
28
,
209
225
.
15.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1996
). “
A revision of Zwicker’s loudness model
,”
Acustica
82
,
335
345
.
16.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1997
). “
A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss
,”
Aud. Neurosci.
3
,
289
311
.
17.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
, and
Glasberg
,
B. R.
(
1998
). “
Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
32
,
317
335
.
18.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Glasberg
,
B. R.
, and
Stone
,
M. A.
(
1999a
). “
Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
33
,
241
258
.
19.
Moore
,
B. C. J.
,
Vickers
,
D. A.
,
Baer
,
T.
, and
Launer
,
S.
(
1999b
). “
Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
2757
2772
.
20.
Moore, F. R. (1990). Elements of Computer Music (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
21.
Skinner
,
M. W.
,
Holden
,
L. K.
,
Holden
,
T. A.
, and
Demorest
,
M. E.
(
2000
). “
Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant recipients’ thresholds and maximum acceptable loudness levels
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
11
,
203
213
.
22.
Tong
,
Y. C.
,
Blamey
,
P. J.
,
Dowell
,
R. C.
, and
Clark
,
G. M.
(
1983
). “
Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
74
,
73
80
.
23.
Zeng
,
F. G.
, and
Galvin
,
J. J.
III
(
1999
). “
Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners
,”
Ear Hear.
20
,
60
74
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.