The effect of diminished auditory feedback on monophthong and diphthong production was examined in postlingually deafened Australian-English speaking adults. The participants were 4 female and 3 male speakers with severe to profound hearing loss, who were compared to 11 age- and accent-matched normally hearing speakers. The test materials were 5 repetitions of hVd words containing 18 vowels. Acoustic measures that were studied included discrete cosine transform coefficients (DCTs), and vowel duration information. The durational analyses revealed increased total vowel durations with a maintenance of the tense/lax vowel distinctions in the deafened speakers. The deafened speakers preserved a differentiated vowel space, although there were some gender-specific differences seen. For example, there was a retraction of in the front vowels for the female speakers that did not occur in the males. However, all deafened speakers showed a close correspondence between the monophthong and diphthong formant movements that did occur. Gaussian classification highlighted vowel confusions resulting from changes in the deafened vowel space. The results support the view that postlingually deafened speakers maintain reasonably good speech intelligibility, in part by employing production strategies designed to bolster auditory feedback.
REFERENCES
1.
Bakkum
, M. J.
, Plomp
, R.
, and Pols
, A. C. W.
(1993
). “Objective analysis versus subjective assessment of vowels pronounced by native, non-native, and deaf male speakers of Dutch
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
, 1989
–2004
.2.
Barker, R. (1995). “Qualitative and quantitative analysis of profoundly deafened speech hearing aid versus cochlear implant users,” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Macquarie University.
3.
Bernard
, J. R. L.
(1970a
). “Toward the acoustic specification of Australian English
,” Zeitschrift für Phonetik
2/3
, 113
–128
.4.
Bernard
, J. R. L.
(1970b
). “On nucleus component durations
,” Lang. Speech
13
, 89
–101
.5.
Cowie, R., and Douglas-Cowie, E. (1992). Postlingually Acquired Deafness (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin).
6.
Cowie
, R.
, Douglas-Cowie
, E.
, and Kerr
, A.
(1982
). “A study of speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults
,” J. Laryngol. Otol.
96
, 101
–112
.7.
Cox, F. (1996). “An Acoustic Study of Vowel Variation in Australian English,” unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Macquarie University.
8.
Cox
, F.
(1999
). “Vowel change in Australian English
,” Phonetica
56
, 1
–27
.9.
Cox, F., and Palethorpe, S. (2001). “Vowel change: Synchronic and diachronic evidence,” in English in Australia, edited by D. Blair and P. Collins (John Benjamins, Amsterdam), pp. 17–45.
10.
Disner
, S. F.
(1980
). “Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
67
, 253
–261
.11.
Donath
, T. M.
, Natke
, U.
, and Kalveram
, K. T.
(2002
). “Effects of frequency-shifter auditory feedback on voice contours in syllables
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
, 357
–366
.12.
Economou
, A.
, Tartter
, V.
, Chute
, P. M.
, and Hellman
, S. A.
(1992
). “Speech changes following reimplantation from a single-channel to a multichannel cochlear implant
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
, 1310
–1323
.13.
Ertmer
, D. J.
, Kirk
, K. I.
, Sehgal
, S. T.
, Riley
, A. I.
, and Osberger
, M. J.
(1997
). “A comparison of vowel production by children with multichannel cochlear implants or tactile aids: Perceptual evidence
,” Ear Hear.
18
, 307
–315
.14.
Fairbanks
, G.
(1954
). “Systematic research in experimental phonetics. I. A theory of the speech mechanism as a servosystem
,” J. Speech Hear. Disord.
19
, 133
–139
.15.
Fitzpatick
, L.
, and Ni Chasaide
, A.
(2002
). “Estimating lingual constriction location in high vowels: A comparison of EMA- and EPG-based measures
,” J. Phonetics
30
, 397
–415
.16.
Fourakis
, M.
, Geers
, A.
, and Tobey
, E. A.
(1993
). “An acoustic metric for assessing change in vowel production by profoundly hearing-impaired children
,” J. Speech Hear. Disord.
94
, 2544
–2552
.17.
Gracco, V. (1995). “Central and peripheral components in the control of speech movements,” in Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues, edited by F. Bell-Berti and L. J. Raphael (American Institute of Physics, New York), pp. 418–432.
18.
Hargus-Ferguson
, S.
, and Kewley-Port
, D.
(2002
). “Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
112
, 259
–271
.19.
Harrington
, J.
, and Cassidy
, S.
(1994
). “Dynamic and target theories of vowel classification: Evidence from monophthongs and diphthongs in Australian English
,” Lang. Speech
37
, 357
–373
.20.
Harrington, J., and Cassidy, S. (1999). Techniques in Speech Acoustics (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht).
21.
Harrington
, J.
, Cox
, F.
, and Evans
, Z.
(1997
). “An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general and cultivated Australian English vowels
,” Aust. J. Ling.
17
, 155
–184
.22.
Harrington
, J.
, Palethorpe
, S.
, and Watson
, C. I.
(2000
). “Monophthongal vowel changes in received pronunciation: A acoustic analysis of the Queen’s Christmas Broadcasts
,” J. Int. Phonetic Assoc.
30
, 63
–78
.23.
Hillenbrand
, J.
, Getty
, L. A.
, Clark
, M. J.
, and Wheeler
, K.
(1995
). “Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
, 3099
–3111
.24.
Houde
, J. F.
, and Jordan
, M. I.
(1998
). “Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production
,” Science
279
, 1213
–1216
.25.
Houde
, J. F.
, and Jordan
, M. I.
(2002
). “Sensorimotor adaptation of speech. I. Compensation and adaptation
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
45
, 295
–311
.26.
Kishon-Rabin
, L.
, Taitelbaum
, R.
, Tobin
, Y.
, and Hildesheimer
, M.
(1999
). “The effect of partially restored hearing on speech production of postlingually deafened adults with multichannel cochlear implants
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
, 2843
–2957
.27.
Lane
, H.
, Matthies
, M.
, Perkell
, J.
, Vick
, J.
, and Zandipour
, M.
(2001
). “The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and cv coarticulation
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
44
, 552
–563
.28.
Lane
, H.
, and Tranel
, B.
(1971
). “The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
14
, 677
–709
.29.
Lane
, H.
, and Webster
, J. W.
(1991
). “Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
, 859
–866
.30.
Lane
, H.
, Wozniak
, J.
, Matthies
, M.
, Svirsky
, M.
, Perkell
, J.
, O’Connell
, M.
, and Manzella
, J.
(1997
). “Changes in sound pressure and fundamental frequency contours following changes in hearing status
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 2244
–2252
.31.
Langereis
, M. C.
, Bosman
, A. J.
, van Olphen
, A. F.
, and Smoorenburg
, G. F.
(1997
). “Changes in vowel quality in postlingually deafened cochlear implant users
,” Audiology
36
, 279
–297
.32.
Langereis
, M. C.
, Bosman
, A. J.
, van Olphen
, A. F.
, and Smoorenburg
, G. F.
(1999
). “Intelligibility of vowel produced by postlingually deafened cochlear implant users
,” Audiology
38
, 206
–224
.33.
Larson
, C. R.
, Burnett
, T. A.
, Kiran
, S.
, and Hain
, T.
(2000
). “Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice responses
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
, 559
–564
.34.
Leder
, S. B.
, and Spitzer
, J. B.
(1993
). “Speaking fundamental frequency, intensity and rate of adventitiously profoundly hearing-impaired adult women
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
, 2146
–2151
.35.
Levene, H. (1960). “Robust test for equality of variance,” in Contributions to Probability and Statistics, edited by I. Olkin, S. G. Ghuyre, W. Hoffding, W. G. Madow, and H. B. Mann (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), pp. 278–292.
36.
Lindblom
, B.
, and Engstrand
, O.
(1989
). “In what sense is speech quantal?
” J. Phonetics
17
, 107
–121
.37.
Lobanov
, B. M.
(1971
). “Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
49
, 606
–608
.38.
McCaffrey
, H. A.
, and Sussman
, H. M.
(1994
). “An investigation of vowel organization in speakers with severe and profound hearing loss
,” J. Speech Hear. Res.
37
, 938
–951
.39.
Millar, J., Vonwiller, J., Harrington, J., and Dermody, P. (1994). “The Australian National Database of Spoken Language,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Adelaide), Vol. 2, pp. 67–100.
40.
Mitchell, A. G., and Delbridge, A. (1965). The Pronunciation of English in Australia (Angus and Robertson, Sydney).
41.
Monsen
, R.
(1976
). “Normal and reduced phonological space: The production of English vowels by deaf adolescents
,” J. Phonetics
4
, 189
–198
.42.
Natke
, U.
, and Kalverum
, K. T.
(2001
). “Effects of frequency shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables
,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
44
, 577
–584
.43.
Perkell
, J. S.
, Guenther
, F. H.
, Lane
, H.
, Matthies
, M. L.
, Perrier
, P.
, Vick
, J.
, Wilhelms-Tricarico
, R.
, and Zandipour
, M.
(2000
). “A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss
,” J. Phonetics
28
, 233
–272
.44.
Perkell
, J.
, Lane
, H.
, Svirsky
, M. A.
, and Webster
, J.
(1992
). “Speech of cochlear implant patients: A longitudinal study of vowel production
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
, 2961
–2978
.45.
Plant
, G.
(1984
). “The effects of an acquired profound hearing loss on speech production
,” Br. J. Audiol.
18
, 39
–48
.46.
Plant, G., and Hammarberg, B. (1983). “Acoustic and perceptual analysis of the speech of the deafened,” STL-QPSR, 2–3, 85–107.
47.
Richardson
, L. M.
, Busby
, P. A.
, Blamey
, P. J.
, Dowell
, R. C.
, and Clark
, G. M.
(1993
). “The effects of auditory feedback from the nucleus cochlear implant on the vowel formant frequencies produced by children and adults
,” Ear Hear.
14
, 339
–349
.48.
Siegel
, G. M.
, and Pick
, Jr., H. L.
(1974
). “Auditory feedback in the regulation of voice
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
56
(5
), 1618
–1624
.49.
Simpson
, A. P.
(2001
). “Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
, 2153
–2164
.50.
Simpson
, A. P.
(2002
). “Gender-specific articulatory-acoustic relations in vowel sequences
,” J. Phonetics
30
, 417
–435
.51.
Smyth
, V.
, Murdoch
, B. E.
, McCormack
, P.
, and Marshall
, I.
(1991
). “Objective and subjective evaluation of subjects fitted with the cochlear multi-channel cochlear prostheses: 3 studies
,” Aust. J. Human Commun. Disord.
19
, 31
–52
.52.
Svirsky
, M.
, Lane
, H. L.
, Perkell
, J. S.
, and Wozniak
, J.
(1992
). “Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
, 1284
–1300
.53.
Svirsky
, M. A.
, and Tobey
, E. A.
(1991
). “Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
, 2895
–2904
.54.
Tartter
, V. C.
, Chute
, P. M.
, and Helman
, S. A.
(1989
). “The speech of a postlingually deafened teenager during the first year of use of a multichannel cochlear implant
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
, 2113
–2121
.55.
Tobey, E. A. (1993). “Speech Production,” in Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations, edited by R. S. Tyler (Singular, San Diego), pp. 257–316.
56.
van Summers
, W.
, Pisoni
, D. B.
, Bernacki
, R. H.
, Pedlow
, R. I.
, and Stokes
, M. A.
(1988
). “Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
84
, 917
–928
.57.
Waldstein
, R. S.
(1990
). “Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: Implications for the role of auditory feedback
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
88
, 2099
–2114
.58.
Waters
, T.
(1986
). “Speech therapy with cochlear implant wearers
,” Br. J. Audiol.
20
, 35
–43
.59.
Watson
, C. I.
, and Harrington
, J.
(1999
). “Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
, 458
–468
.60.
Watson
, C. I.
, Harrington
, J.
, and Evans
, Z.
(1998
). “An acoustic comparison between New Zealand and Australian English vowels
,” Aust. J. Ling.
18
, 185
–207
.61.
Zahorian
, S. A.
, and Jagharghi
, A. J.
(1993
). “Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels
,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
94
, 1966
–1982
.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 Acoustical Society of America.
2003
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.
