A systematic improvement in auditory performance over time, following a change in the acoustic information available to the listener (that cannot be attributed to task, procedural or training effects) is known as auditory acclimatization. However, there is conflicting evidence concerning the existence of auditory acclimatization; some studies show an improvement in performance over time while other studies show no change. In an attempt to resolve this conflict, speech recognition abilities of 16 subjects with bilateral sensorineural hearing impairments were measured over a 12-week period following provision of a monaural hearing instrument for the first time. The not-fitted ear was used as the control. Three presentation levels were used representing quiet, normal, and raised speech. The results confirm the presence of acclimatization. In addition, the results show that acclimatization is evident at the higher presentation levels but not at the lowest.

1.
ANSI (1989). ANSI S3.6 (1989), “Specification for Audiometers” (American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York).
2.
ANSI (1997). ANSI S3.5 (1997), “American National Standard Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index” (American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York).
3.
Arlinger
,
S.
,
Gatehouse
,
S.
,
Bentler
,
R. A.
,
Byrne
,
D.
,
Cox
,
R. M.
,
Dirks
,
D. D.
,
Humes
,
L.
,
Neuman
,
A.
,
Ponton
,
K.
,
Robinson
,
K.
,
Silman
,
S.
,
Summerfield
,
A. Q.
,
Turner
,
C. W.
,
Tyler
,
R. S.
, and
Willott
,
J. F.
(
1996
). “
Report of the Eriksholm workshop on auditory deprivation and acclimatization
,”
Ear Hear.
17
,
87S
98S
.
4.
Bentler
,
R. A.
,
Neibuhr
,
D. P.
,
Getta
,
J. P.
, and
Anderson
,
C. V.
(
1993
). “
Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. I. Objective measures
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
36
,
808
819
.
5.
Byrne
,
D.
, and
Dillon
,
H.
(
1986
). “
The National Acoustics Laboratories (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid
,”
Ear Hear.
7
,
257
265
.
6.
Cox
,
R. M.
, and
Alexander
,
G. C.
(
1992
). “
Maturation of hearing aid benefit: Objective and subjective measurements
,”
Ear Hear.
13
,
1311
1341
.
7.
Cox
,
R. M.
,
Alexander
,
G. C.
,
Taylor
,
I. M.
, and
Gray
,
G. A.
(
1996
). “
Benefit acclimatization in elderly hearing aid users
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
7
,
428
441
.
8.
Demany
,
L.
(
1985
). “
Perceptual learning in frequency discrimination
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
78
,
1118
1120
.
9.
Duquesnoy
,
A. J.
, and
Plomp
,
R.
(
1983
). “
The effect of a hearing aid on the speech reception threshold of hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
73
,
2166
2173
.
10.
Foster
,
J. R.
, and
Haggard
,
M. P.
(
1979
). “
FAAF. An effective analytical test of speech perception
,”
Proc. Inst. Acous.
182
,
9
12
.
11.
Foster
,
J. R.
, and
Haggard
,
M. P.
(
1987
). “
The four alternative auditory feature test (FAAF): Linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
21
,
165
174
.
12.
Gatehouse
,
S.
(
1989
). “
Apparent auditory deprivation effects of late onset: The role of presentation level
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
86
,
2103
2106
.
13.
Gatehouse
,
S.
(
1992
). “
The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: Evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
1258
1268
.
14.
Gatehouse
,
S.
(
1993
). “
Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol
4
,
296
306
.
15.
Gatehouse, S. (1997). “Outcome measures for the evaluation of adult hearing aid fittings and services,” Scientific and Technical Report to the Department of Health, London, England.
16.
Gatehouse
,
S.
(
1998
). “
Speech tests as measures of outcome
,”
Scand. Audiol. Suppl.
27
,
54
60
.
17.
Gatehouse, S., and Robinson, K. (1996). “Acclimatization to monaural hearing aid fitting effects on loudness functions and preliminary evidence for parallel electrophysiological and behavioural effects,” in Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing aids, edited by B. Kollmeier (World Scientific, Singapore), pp. 319–330.
18.
Hawkins
,
D.
,
Alvarez
,
E.
, and
Houlihan
,
J.
(
1991
). “
Reliability of three types of probe tube microphone measurements
,”
Hear. Instru.
42
,
14
16
.
19.
Horwitz
,
A. R.
, and
Turner
,
C. W.
(
1997
). “
The time course of hearing aid benefit
,”
Ear Hear.
18
,
1
11
.
20.
Humes
,
L. E.
,
Barlow
,
N. N.
,
Garner
,
C. B.
, and
Wilson
,
D. L.
(
2000
). “
Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid users
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
43
,
879
892
.
21.
Humes
,
L. E.
,
Garner
,
C. B.
,
Wilson
,
D. L.
, and
Barlow
,
N. N.
(
2001
). “
Hearing-aid outcome measures following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly
,”
J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.
44
,
469
486
.
22.
Humes
,
L. E.
,
Halling
,
D.
, and
Coughlin
,
M.
(
1996
). “
Reliability and stability of various hearing-aid outcome measures in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers
,”
J. Speech Hear. Res.
39
,
923
935
.
23.
Humes, L. E., Wilson, D. L., Barlow, N. N., and Garner, C. (2002). “Changes in hearing-aid benefit following one, two, or three years of hearing aid use by the elderly,” J. Speech Hear. Res. (in press).
24.
ISO 8253-2. (1998). Acoustics—Audiometric test methods. Part 2: Sound Field Audiometry with Pure Tone and Narrow-band Test Signals (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).
25.
Irvine
,
D. R. F.
,
Martin
,
R. L.
,
Klimkeit
,
E.
, and
Smith
,
R.
(
2000
). “
Specificity of perceptual learning in a frequency discrimination task
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
108
,
2964
2968
.
26.
Larson
,
V. D.
,
Williams
,
D. W.
,
Henderson
,
W. G.
,
Leuthke
,
L. E.
,
Beck
,
L. B.
,
Noffinger
,
D.
,
Wilson
,
R. H.
,
Dobie
,
R. A.
,
Haskell
,
G. B.
,
Bratt
,
G. W.
,
Shanks
,
J. E.
,
Stemmoachowicz
,
P.
,
Studebaker
,
G. A.
,
Boysen
,
A. E.
,
Donahue
,
A.
,
Canalis
,
R.
,
Fausti
,
S. A.
, and
Rappaport
,
B. Z.
(
2000
). “
Efficacy of three commonly used hearing aid circuits
,”
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
11
,
1806
1813
.
27.
Lutman
,
M. E.
, and
Clark
,
J.
(
1986
). “
Speech identification under simulated hearing-aid frequency response characteristics in relation to sensitivity, frequency resolution, and temporal resolution
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
1030
1040
.
28.
Munro, K. J., and Lutman, M. E. (2000). “Auditory acclimatization to amplified speech,” Poster presentation at IHCON 2000, Lake Tahoe.
29.
Neuman
,
A. C.
(
1996
). “
Late-onset auditory deprivation: A review of past research and an assessment of future research needs
,”
Ear Hear.
17
,
3S
13S
.
30.
Palmer
,
C. V.
,
Nelson
,
C. T.
, and
Lindley
,
G. A.
(
1998
). “
The functionally and physiologically plastic adult auditory system
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
1705
1721
.
31.
Pavlovic
,
C. V.
,
Studebaker
,
G. A.
, and
Sherbecoe
,
R. L.
(
1986
). “
An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
50
57
.
32.
Pearsons, K. S., Bennett, R. L., and Fidells, S. (1977). “Speech levels in various noise environments” (Report No. EPA-600/1-77-025). (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.).
33.
Robinson
,
D. W.
(
1991
). “
Long-term repeatability of the pure-tone hearing threshold and its relation to noise exposure
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
25
,
219
235
.
34.
Robinson
,
K.
, and
Gatehouse
,
S.
(
1995
). “
Changes in intensity discrimination following monaural long-term use of a hearing aid
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
97
,
1183
1190
.
35.
Robinson
,
K.
, and
Gatehouse
,
S.
(
1996
). “
The time course of effects on intensity discrimination following monaural fitting of hearing aids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
,
1255
1258
.
36.
Robinson
,
K.
, and
Summerfield
,
A. Q.
(
1996
). “
Adult auditory learning and training
,”
Ear Hear.
17
,
51S
65S
.
37.
Saunders
,
G. H.
, and
Cienkowski
,
K. M.
(
1997
). “
Acclimatization to hearing aids
,”
Ear Hear.
18
,
129
139
.
38.
Shields
,
P. W.
, and
Campbell
,
D. R.
(
2001
). “
Intelligibility, subjective ratings and completion time scores using the FAAF test with hearing-impaired subjects and noisy reverberant environments
,”
Br. J. Audiol.
35
,
237
245
.
39.
Studebaker
,
G. A.
,
Sherbecoe
,
R. L.
,
McDaniel
,
D. M.
, and
Gwaltney
,
C. A.
(
1999
). “
Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
2431
2444
.
40.
Surr
,
R. K.
,
Cord
,
M. T.
, and
Walden
,
B. E.
(
1998
). “
Long-term versus short-term hearing aid benefit
,”
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
9
,
165
171
.
41.
Taylor
,
K. S.
(
1993
). “
Self-perceived and audiometric evaluations of hearing aid benefit in the elderly
,”
Ear Hear.
14
,
390
394
.
42.
Turner
,
C. W.
, and
Bentler
,
R. A.
(
1998
). “
Does hearing aid benefit increase over time?” Letter to Editor
.
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
,
3673
3674
.
43.
Turner
,
C. W.
,
Humes
,
L. E.
,
Bentler
,
R. A.
, and
Cox
,
R. M.
(
1996
). “
A review of past research on changes in hearing aid benefit over time
,”
Ear Hear.
17
,
14S
28S
.
44.
Wright
,
B. A.
,
Buonomano
,
D. V.
,
Mahnvcke
,
H. W.
, and
Merzenich
,
M. M.
(
1997
). “
Learning and generalization of auditory temporal-interval discrimination in humans
,”
J. Neurosci.
17
,
3956
3963
.
45.
Wright
,
B. A.
, and
Fitzgerald
,
M. B.
(
2001
). “
Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source localization
,”
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
98
,
12307
12312
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.