Three experiments investigated the relationship between harmonic number, harmonic resolvability, and the perception of harmonic complexes. Complexes with successive equal-amplitude sine- or random-phase harmonic components of a 100- or 200-Hz fundamental frequency were presented dichotically, with even and odd components to opposite ears, or diotically, with all harmonics presented to both ears. Experiment 1 measured performance in discriminating a 3.5%–5% frequency difference between a component of a harmonic complex and a pure tone in isolation. Listeners achieved at least 75% correct for approximately the first 10 and 20 individual harmonics in the diotic and dichotic conditions, respectively, verifying that only processes before the binaural combination of information limit frequency selectivity. Experiment 2 measured fundamental frequency difference limens as a function of the average lowest harmonic number. Similar results at both provide further evidence that harmonic number, not absolute frequency, underlies the order-of-magnitude increase observed in when only harmonics above about the 10th are presented. Similar results under diotic and dichotic conditions indicate that the auditory system, in performing discrimination, is unable to utilize the additional peripherally resolved harmonics in the dichotic case. In experiment 3, dichotic complexes containing harmonics below the 12th, or only above the 15th, elicited pitches of the and twice the respectively. Together, experiments 2 and 3 suggest that harmonic number, regardless of peripheral resolvability, governs the transition between two different pitch percepts, one based on the frequencies of individual resolved harmonics and the other based on the periodicity of the temporal envelope.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2003
May 29 2003
Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: Harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?
Joshua G. Bernstein;
Joshua G. Bernstein
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Harvard—MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew J. Oxenham
Andrew J. Oxenham
Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Harvard—MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 3323–3334 (2003)
Article history
Received:
October 31 2002
Accepted:
March 17 2003
Citation
Joshua G. Bernstein, Andrew J. Oxenham; Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: Harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 June 2003; 113 (6): 3323–3334. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1572146
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
All we know about anechoic chambers
Michael Vorländer
Day-to-day loudness assessments of indoor soundscapes: Exploring the impact of loudness indicators, person, and situation
Siegbert Versümer, Jochen Steffens, et al.
A survey of sound source localization with deep learning methods
Pierre-Amaury Grumiaux, Srđan Kitić, et al.
Related Content
Detection and direction-discrimination of diotic and dichotic ramp modulations in amplitude and phase
J Acoust Soc Am (January 2003)
The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (November 2005)
An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (October 2009)
Dichotic and diotic presentation of a click‐on‐sentence task
J Acoust Soc Am (August 2005)
Diotic and dichotic discrimination of binary sequences
J Acoust Soc Am (April 2005)