This paper presents the results of new studies based on speech intelligibility tests in simulated sound fields and analyses of impulse response measurements in rooms used for speech communication. The speech intelligibility test results confirm the importance of early reflections for achieving good conditions for speech in rooms. The addition of early reflections increased the effective signal-to-noise ratio and related speech intelligibility scores for both impaired and nonimpaired listeners. The new results also show that for common conditions where the direct sound is reduced, it is only possible to understand speech because of the presence of early reflections. Analyses of measured impulse responses in rooms intended for speech show that early reflections can increase the effective signal-to-noise ratio by up to 9 dB. A room acoustics computer model is used to demonstrate that the relative importance of early reflections can be influenced by the room acoustics design.

1.
R. S.
Shankland
, “
Architectural acoustics in America to 1930
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
250
254
(
1977
).
2.
H.
Haas
, “
Uber den Einfluss des Einfachechos auf die Horsamkeit von Sprache
,”
Acustica
1
,
49
58
(
1951
).
3.
H.
Wallach
,
E. B.
Newman
, and
M. R.
Rosenzweig
, “
The precedence effect in sound localization
,”
Am. J. Psychol.
52
,
315
336
(
1949
).
4.
J. P. A.
Lochner
and
J. F
Burger
, “
The influence of reflections on auditorium acoustics
,”
J. Sound Vib.
1
,
426
454
(
1964
).
5.
H. G.
Latham
, “
The signal-to-noise ratio for speech intelligibility—An auditorium acoustics design index
,”
Appl. Acoust.
12
,
253
320
(
1979
).
6.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
837
845
(
1986
).
7.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
846
854
(
1986
).
8.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Relationships among measures of speech intelligibility in rooms
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
46
,
396
405
(
1998
).
9.
F. H.
Bess
, “
Classroom acoustics: An overview
,”
Volta Review
101
,
1
14
(
2001
).
10.
A. K.
Nábĕlek
and
L.
Robinette
, “
Influence of the precedence effect on word identification by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
,
187
194
(
1978
).
11.
Anon, “American national standard acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schools,” ANSI Standard S12.60–2002.
12.
Anon, “Acoustics—Threshold of hearing by air conduction as a function of age and sex for otologically normal persons,” ISO 7029–1984 (E), International Organisation for Standardisation.
13.
M.
Picard
and
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Revisiting speech interference and remedial solutions in classrooms
,”
Audiology
40
,
221
244
(
2001
).
14.
W. T.
Chu
and
A. C. C.
Warnock
, “
Directivity of human talkers
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
2664
(
2001
).
15.
R.
Plomp
and
A. M.
Mimpen
, “
Effect of the orientation of the speaker’s head and azimuth of a noise source on the speech-reception threshold for sentences
,”
Acustica
48
,
325
328
(
1981
).
16.
R. Y.
Litovsky
and
H. S.
Colburn
, “
The precedence effect
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
1633
1654
(
1999
).
17.
A. K.
Nábĕlek
and
J. M.
Pickett
, “
Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
56
,
628
639
(
1974
).
18.
R. D.
Reich
and
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Optimizing classroom acoustics using computer model studies
,”
Can. Acoust.
26
,
15
21
(
1998
).
19.
J. S.
Bradley
,
R. D.
Reich
, and
S. G.
Norcross
, “
On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
1820
1828
(
1999
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.