The study of mosque acoustics, with regard to acoustical characteristics, sound quality for speech intelligibility, and other applicable acoustic criteria, has been largely neglected. In this study a background as to why mosques are designed as they are and how mosque design is influenced by worship considerations is given. In the study the acoustical characteristics of typically constructed contemporary mosques in Saudi Arabia have been investigated, employing a well-known impulse response. Extensive field measurements were taken in 21 representative mosques of different sizes and architectural features in order to characterize their acoustical quality and to identify the impact of air conditioning, ceiling fans, and sound reinforcement systems on their acoustics. Objective room-acoustic indicators such as reverberation time (RT) and clarity (C50) were measured. Background noise (BN) was assessed with and without the operation of air conditioning and fans. The speech transmission index (STI) was also evaluated with and without the operation of existing sound reinforcement systems. The existence of acoustical deficiencies was confirmed and quantified. The study, in addition to describing mosque acoustics, compares design goals to results obtained in practice and suggests acoustical target values for mosque design. The results show that acoustical quality in the investigated mosques deviates from optimum conditions when unoccupied, but is much better in the occupied condition.

Topics
Acoustics, Sound projection devices, Sound source perception, Speech intelligibility, Speech processing systems, Signal processing
1.
R. N.
Hammad
, “
RASTI measurements in mosques in Amman, Jordan
,”
Appl. Acoust.
30
,
335
–
345
(
1990
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
2.
M. K.
Abdelazeez
,
R. N.
Hammad
, and
A. A.
Mustafa
, “
Acoustics of King Abdullah mosque
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
1441
–
1445
(
1991
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
A. El Bashir and A. Al-Gunaimi, “Evaluation of acoustical performance of mosques: a case study on a typical mosque in the Gulf region,” Proceedings of the 4th Saudi Engineers Conference, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Jeddah, 1995, Vol. 1.
4.
A. Abdou, “Predicting and assessing the acoustical performance of mosques employing computer simulation: a case study,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Mosque Architecture, 1999, Vol. 6, pp. 73–87.
5.
D. L.
Klepper
, “
The distribution column sound system at Holy Cross Cathedral, Boston, the reconciliation of speech and music
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
99
,
417
–
425
(
1996
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
J. Anderson and T. Jacobsen, “RASTI measurements in St. Paul’s Cathedral,” London, Brüel & Kjaer Note No., 1985.
7.
R. W. Guy and A. Abdou, “Acoustic quality via sound intensity measurements in a church,” Proceedings of Inter. Noise 94, Yokohama, Japan, 1994, pp. 1851–1854.
8.
A. P. O. Carvalho, “Relationships between objective acoustical measures and architectural features in churches,” Proceedings of the W. C. Sabine Symposium, the 127th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994, pp. 311–314.
9.
P. O. Carvalho, A. E. J. Morgado, and L. Henrique, “Relationship between speech intelligibility and objective acoustical parameters for architectural features in catholic churches.”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, Pt 2, 3051(A) (1997).
10.
M.
Galindo
,
T.
Zamarreno
, and
S.
Giron
, “
Clarity and definition in Mudejar-Gothic churches
,”
J. Building Acoust.
6
(
1
),
1
–
16
(
1999
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
M.
Barron
, “
Impulse testing techniques for auditoria
,”
Appl. Acoust.
17
,
165
–
181
(
1984
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
12.
H.
Tachibana
,
H.
Yano
, and
Y.
Hidaka
, “
Measurement of impulse response and its applications in room acoustics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
,
1856
(
1991
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
G. R. D. King, The Historical Mosques of Saudi Arabia (Longman Group Ltd., United Kingdom, 1986).
14.
I. Sergeld and J. Steele, in Architecture of The Contemporary Mosque, edited by Ismail Serageldin and James Steele (Academy Group Ltd., London, 1996).
15.
H. M. Ibrahim, Planning Standards for Mosques (in Arabic), Ministry of Municipal & Rural Affairs, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 1979.
16.
Documents of the Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Endowments, Da’wah and Guidance (MIAEGD), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
17.
A.
Abdou
and
R. W.
Guy
, “
Spatial information of sound fields for room-acoustic evaluation and diagnosis
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
3215
–
3322
(
1996
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
18.
J. P.
Lochner
and
J. F.
Burger
, “
The influence of reflections on auditorium acoustics
,”
J. Sound Vib.
1
,
426
–
454
(
1964
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
19.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
837
–
845
(
1986
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
20.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
80
,
846
–
854
(
1986
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
21.
T.
Houtgast
and
H. J. M.
Steeneken
, “
A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
77
,
1069
–
1077
(
1985
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
22.
H. J. M. Steeneken and T. Houtgast, “RASTI: a tool for evaluating auditoria,” Technical Review, Brüel & Kjaer, No. 3, 1985, pp. 13–30.
23.
“The objective rating of speech intelligibility in auditoria by the ‘RASTI’ method,” IEC 268, part 16, Sound System Equipment, 1988.
24.
V. M. A.
Peutz
, “
Articulation loss of consonants as a criterion for speech transmission in a room
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
9
,
915
–
919
(
1971
).
Google Scholar
 
25.
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Relationships among measures of speech intelligibility in rooms
,”
J. Audio Eng. Soc.
46
,
396
–
405
(
1998
).
Google Scholar
 
26.
P. W.
Barnett
, “
A review of speech intelligibility indicators—their relationship and applications
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, No.
5
,
3050
(A) (
1997
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
27.
J. van der Werff, “Speech intelligibility in rooms,” Proceedings of InterNoise 97, 15–17 June 1997, pp. 349–354.
28.
M.
Hodgson
,
R.
Rempel
, and
S.
Kennedy
, “
Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background noise levels in university classrooms during lectures
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
226
–
233
(
1999
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
29.
M.
Hodgson
, “
Experimental investigation of the acoustical characteristics of university classrooms
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
106
,
1810
–
1819
(
2000
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
30.
S. R.
Bistafa
and
J. S.
Bradley
, “
Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comprehensive study of speech intelligibility metrics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
861
–
875
(
2000
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
31.
D. D. Rife, “Maximum length sequence system analyzer,” Reference Manual, DRA Laboratories, 1987–1996, p. 86.
32.
ISO 3382, “Acoustics measurement of reverberation time of rooms with reference to other acoustical parameters,” 1997.
33.
H. J. M.
Steeneken
and
T.
Houtgast
, “
A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
61
,
318
–
326
(
1980
).
Google Scholar
 
34.
N. R.
French
and
J. C.
Steinberg
, “
Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
19
,
90
–
119
(
1947
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
35.
H. Kuttruff, Room Acoustics, 3rd ed. (Elsevier, London and New York, 1991), p. 164.
36.
B. J. Smith, R. J. Peters, and S. Owen, Acoustics and Noise Control (Longman, London/New York, 1988), pp. 34–36.
37.
D. Templeton, P. Sacre, P. Mapp, and D. Saunders, Acoustics in the Built Environment, 2nd ed. (Architectural Press, City, 1997), pp. 58–68.
38.
B. Stein and J. S. Reynolds, Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for Buildings, 8th ed. (Wiley, New York, 1992), p. 1325.
39.
M. D. Egan, Architectural Acoustics (McGraw-Hill, United Kingdom, 1998), p. 370.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 Acoustical Society of America.
2003
Acoustical Society of America
You do not currently have access to this content.