An interrupted noise exposure of sufficient intensity, presented on a daily repeating cycle, produces a threshold shift (TS) following the first day of exposure. TSs measured on subsequent days of the exposure sequence have been shown to decrease relative to the initial TS. This reduction of TS, despite the continuing daily exposure regime, has been called a cochlear toughening effect and the exposures referred to as toughening exposures. Four groups of chinchillas were exposed to one of four different noises presented on an interrupted (6 h/day for 20 days) or noninterrupted (24 h/day for 5 days) schedule. The exposures had equivalent total energy, an overall level of 100 dB(A) SPL, and approximately the same flat, broadband long-term spectrum. The noises differed primarily in their temporal structures; two were Gaussian and two were non-Gausssian, nonstationary. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials were used to estimate hearing thresholds and surface preparation histology was used to determine sensory cell loss. The experimental results presented here show that: (1) Exposures to interrupted high-level, non-Gaussian signals produce a toughening effect comparable to that produced by an equivalent interrupted Gaussian noise. (2) Toughening, whether produced by Gaussian or non-Gaussian noise, results in reduced trauma compared to the equivalent uninterrupted noise, and (3) that both continuous and interrupted non-Gaussian exposures produce more trauma than do energy and spectrally equivalent Gaussian noises. Over the course of the 20-day exposure, the pattern of TS following each day’s exposure could exhibit a variety of configurations. These results do not support the equal energy hypothesis as a unifying principal for estimating the potential of a noise exposure to produce hearing loss.

1.
Ahroon
,
W. A.
,
Hamernik
,
R. P.
, and
Davis
,
R. I.
(
1993
). “
Complex noise exposures: An energy analysis
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
997
1006
.
2.
Ahroon
,
W. A.
, and
Hamernik
,
R. P.
(
2000
). “
The effects of interrupted noise exposures on the noise-damaged cochlea
,”
Hear. Res.
143
,
103
109
.
3.
Boettcher
,
F. A.
,
Sponger
,
V. P.
, and
Salvi
,
R. J.
(
1992
). “
Physiological and histological changes associated with the reduction of the threshold shift during interrupted noise exposure
,”
Hear. Res.
62
,
217
236
.
4.
Bohne
,
B. A.
, and
Rabbitt
,
K. D.
(
1983
). “
Holes in the reticular lamina after noise exposure: Implication for continuing damage in the organ of Corti
,”
Hear. Res.
11
,
41
53
.
5.
Bohne
,
B. A.
,
Yohman
,
L.
, and
Gruner
,
M. M.
(
1987
). “
Cochlear damage following interrupted exposure to high-frequency noise
,”
Hear. Res.
27
,
251
264
.
6.
Brownell
,
W. E.
(
1990
). “
Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions
,”
Ear Hear.
11
,
82
92
.
7.
Campo
,
P.
,
Subramanian
,
M.
, and
Henderson
,
D.
(
1991
). “
The effects of ‘conditioning’ exposures on hearing loss from traumatic exposure
,”
Hear. Res.
55
,
195
200
.
8.
Clark
,
W. W.
,
Bohne
,
B. A.
, and
Boettcher
,
F. A.
(
1987
). “
Effects of periodic rest on hearing loss and cochlear damage following exposure to noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
82
,
1253
1264
.
9.
Eldredge
,
D. H.
,
Miller
,
J. A.
, and
Bohne
,
B. A.
(
1981
). “
A frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
69
,
1091
1095
.
10.
Fay, R. A. (1988). Hearing in Vertebrates (Hill-Fay, Winnetka, IL).
11.
Hamernik
,
R. P.
,
Turrentine
,
G.
,
Roberto
,
M.
,
Salvi
,
R.
, and
Henderson
,
D.
(
1984
). “
Anatomical correlates of impulse noise-induced mechanical damage in the cochlea
,”
Hear. Res.
13
,
229
247
.
12.
Hamernik
,
R. P.
, and
Ahroon
,
W. A.
(
1998
). “
Interrupted noise exposures: Threshold shift dynamics and permanent effects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
3478
3488
.
13.
Hamernik
,
R. P.
,
Ahroon
,
W. A.
,
Jock
,
B. M.
, and
Bennett
,
J. A.
(
1998
). “
Noise-induced threshold shift dynamics measured with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials in chinchillas with inner hair cell deficient cochleas
,”
Hear. Res.
118
,
73
82
.
14.
Hamernik
,
R. P.
, and
Qiu
,
W.
(
2001
). “
Energy-independent factors influencing noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla model
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
110
,
3163
3168
.
15.
Henselman
,
L. W.
,
Henderson
,
D.
,
Subramaniam
,
M.
, and
Sallustio
,
V.
(
1994
). “
The effect of ‘conditioning’ exposures on hearing loss from impulse noise
,”
Hear. Res.
78
,
1
10
.
16.
Hsueh
,
K. D.
, and
Hamernik
,
R. P.
(
1990
). “
A generalized approach to random noise synthesis: Theory and computer simulation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
87
,
1207
117
.
17.
Hsueh
,
K. D.
, and
Hamernik
,
R. P.
(
1991
). “
Performance characteristics of a phase domain approach to random noise synthesis
,”
Noise Control Eng. J.
36
,
18
32
.
18.
Hu
,
B. H.
,
Henderson
,
D.
, and
Nicotera
,
T. M.
(
2002
). “
Involvement of apoptosis in progression of cochlear lesion following exposure to intense noise
,”
Hear. Res.
166
,
62
71
.
19.
ISO-1999 (1990). “Acoustics: Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva).
20.
Jacono
,
A. A.
,
Hu
,
B.
,
Kopke
,
R. D.
,
Henderson
,
D.
,
Van De Water
,
T. R.
, and
Steinman
,
H. M.
(
1998
). “
Changes in cochlear antioxidant enzyme activity after sound conditioning and noise exposure in the chinchilla
,”
Hear. Res.
117
,
31
38
.
21.
Lei
,
S. F.
,
Ahroon
,
W. A.
, and
Hamernik
,
R. P.
(
1994
). “
The application of frequency and time domain kurtosis to the assessment of hazardous noise exposures
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
96
,
1435
1444
.
22.
McFadden
,
S. L.
,
Henderson
,
D.
, and
Shen
,
Y. H.
(
1997
). “
Low-frequency ‘conditioning’ provides long-term protection from noise-induced threshold shifts in chinchillas
,”
Hear. Res.
103
,
142
150
.
23.
Miller
,
J. D.
,
Watson
,
C. S.
, and
Covell
,
W. P.
(
1963
). “
Deafening effects of noise on the cat
,”
Acta Oto-laryngologica Suppl.
176
,
1
81
.
24.
Mills, J. H., Lee, F. S., Dubno, J. R., and Boettcher, F. A. (1996). “
Interactions between age-related and noise-induced hearing loss,” in Scientific Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, edited by A. Axelsson, H. Borchgrevink, R. P. Hamernik, P. A. Hellstrom, D. Henderson, and R. J. Salvi (Thieme, New York), pp. 193–212.
25.
Subramaniam
,
M.
,
Campo
,
P.
, and
Henderson
,
D.
(
1991
). “
The effect of exposure level on the development of progressive resistance to noise
,”
Hear. Res.
52
,
181
188
.
26.
Subramaniam
,
M.
,
Henderson
,
D.
,
Campo
,
P.
, and
Sponger
,
V.
(
1992
). “
The effect of ‘conditioning’ on hearing loss from a high frequency traumatic exposure
,”
Hear. Res.
58
,
57
62
.
27.
Subramaniam
,
M.
,
Henderson
,
D.
, and
Sponger
,
V.
(
1993
). “
Effect of low-frequency ‘conditioning’ on hearing loss from high-frequency exposure
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
93
,
952
956
.
28.
Ward
,
W. D.
(
1991
). “
The role of intermittence in PTS
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
90
,
164
169
.
29.
White
,
D. R.
,
Boettcher
,
F. A.
,
Miles
,
L. R.
, and
Gratton
,
M. A.
(
1998
). “
Effectiveness of intermittent and continuous acoustic simulation in preventing noise-induced hearing and hair cell loss
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
103
,
1566
1572
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.